「rules」
anondiscuss politics here
1. if staff don't like your post, they may delete it or ban you
discuss politics here
1. if staff don't like your post, they may delete it or ban you
thoughts?
(unintentionally)
yeah but they're THAT libertarian
thoughts on the pavel durov arrest? founder/CEO of telegram
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/26/who-is-telegram-founder-pavel-durov-and-why-was-he-arrested.html
if all the feds have on him is "you didn't prevent criminals using your app to do illegal things", what the hell is he supposed to have done?
there are plenty of foss apps that use genuine end2end encryption where outsiders absolutely positively cannot know what you're sending, are all of those developers gonna get arrested too?
i think there rly should be some middle ground between illegal-activity-heaven and big-brother-police-state but if the solution is to just build backdoors that only "the good guys" can get into, it feels like a waste
>>8316
if it's E2EE the only options are backdoors or they can never see anything
>>8400
metadata useful. and most telegram isn’t e2ee
>trump is going to appoint a fox news host as head of the military
you know what? im done dooming. im gonna sit back and enjoy the hilarity of this country burning
i knew his second term would be like a comedy show but it's already starting to look like it'll be way more ridiculous than his first term
remember when the worst pick trump announced was pete hegsgeth?
>>24740
test
welp
it's over
>>12804
this is incredible
hello anon!
dogs should vote
#agree
i vote for dog votes
>>7287
a vote for dogs is a vote for dogs #vote