>>15912
this is making me laugh lol i would totally call a roomba a floor slut

>>15914
#blur

oh god what the fuck did it generate

i did call it floor slut lol that's why i thought of it cuz i got the notification it's not working

why does the transmasc bot have bigger boobs than the woman bot D:

there we go

>>15930
SO REAL

>>15931
cold dog >~<

>>15931
woah?

whats the bump limit here btw

also 8K?

>>15942
looks like a creepypasta monster tbh

what drug is this

why did you ban me

>>15973
why did you get banned?

none of these have nuclear bombs

oh wow

>>15981
reminds me of a certain painting

damn how many days in a row did we nuke them

lmao

>>15975
i said rape

>>15991
they kept rebuilding too..

every day

ibpol

guys it's christmas time

test

>>16003
THE TEXT DIDN'T WORK WHAT THE FUCK IS THE POINT

I'M TRYING TO MAKE COMPELLING ADVERTISEMENTS

i have actual tasks i need to do and im doing this

i guess the ai decided you guys get to live :D

\the world if hitler never existed

:0

>>16015
#diffuse

>>16014
#diffuse

>>16012
#diffuse

its definitely better than before. i think it should prob try to target some of the special post colors too like greentext and the post numbers and stuff and apply all the same legibility stuff between those and the main post bg but that would be a lot of work

something i will sleep on

>>15981
#diffuse

>>16023
uwu

#cleartheme

>>16028
the colors arent v interesting

why didn't you diffuse the nuclear bombing ones huh

>>16003
#diffuse

oh actually its not bad

i think the basic color distance thing is actually doing a lot of legwork i think maybe another bandaid solution on brightness will make it good enough for gubmint work

i really dont want to learn the complicated fuckin math for perceptual color difference

>>16036
#diffuse

it only needs a few pixels of black and the way its set up it tries to grab the most different colors possible so it will almost always grab outlier colors like a spot of black on a bright image or vice versa

>>16040
#diffuse

aaaaaaaaaa

#diffuse

>>16045
#diffuse

>>16035
#diffuse

>>16039
>the way it's set up
wtf how do you know how it's set up

#cleartheme

>>16035
#diffusr

>>16035
#diffuse

stop the text is literally unreadable

#cleartheme

yeah thats the problem i keep running into

oof

no image upload rights for me

so far the solution is to gather the colorset (which we dont have much control over its someone elses code) and then calculate RGB linear color distance between each pair and then assign the highest difference pair to post body and post text respectively

>>16057
YEAH AND YOU HAVE TO SEND ME $1000 USD IF YOU WOULD LIKE THEM

>>16059
am poor

>>16060
.play that's not my problem spiderman

>>16061
>0 USD
hah

oof

but unfortunately human eyes are not robit eyes and color distance ≠ perceived difference in color

>>16058
but who are you how do you know how this code works

and theres math that smart people have done to compensate for that but i dont want to learn the math

shit now i want to rewatch all the spider man movies

so im trying to figure out caveman ooga booga solutions

i think maybe we could do some post processing on the two selected colors and like lighten the lighter one darken the darker one? and maybe increase saturation to compensate and keep them feeling like colorful and influenced by the original?

idk

>>16065
im anon nice to meet you!

>>16071
what's your rael name

>>16069
could pick the darkest colour as the text, and lightest colour (or one of the lightest ones) as post background text

>>16072
anon e. mouse

>>16073
thats pretty much what it tries to do right now but its a human eye perception thing. absolute RGB brightness does not equal a color looking "bright"

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm yea tru.

nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

>>16077
no nut november november november november november november november november

november

well right now its on color distance actually, you are right brightness should be factored as well. but im pretty sure a sole brightness check will basically always give you a black and a light tan or a white

which is a bit boring

its better than it was before though. before it would give you something totally unreadable 2 out of 3 times

>>16083
april you're here?

okay i'm going back now

kill it

cursed monkey thing

>>16085
i am not

>>16086
>>16086
>>16086
whomst

#cleartheme

>>16080
but yeah like in effect this is usally just choosing the closest pair to (#FFFFFF) and (#000000) so im no sure the brightness thing will even change a ton

>>15963
#diffuse

it definitely doesnt sometimes tho, hard time imagining whats going on here and how that muddy orange can be farther from black than the pale blue

should be grabbing the site background here and using it as the text probably

and making the background the orange instead

#cleartheme

>>16096
it seems like a harder problem to solve than just pick x colour.... i guess just gotta fuck around a lot and see what looks nice

diffuse being a little silly is cool though, it can always be cleared by anyone

>>16102
yeah agree im kinda just working on it cause i think it's a fun problem lol

>>16100
yeah, the grabbing of the colors itself is really complicated and finnicky too

but that's not our code it's some library

>>16105
#diffuse

it loves making the background blindingly white

yeah fr

i think i want to set it up so it weights for certain colors for certain elements

definitely sounds like a good way of doing it
knowing that you want x elements to have this band of colour, or something like that

colour ranges per elm or a "target brightness" or some other metric to compare to

yeah

and it should prob have a clause so it defaults to the normal theme for any elements that cant find an appropriate color in range

hmmmm what about sampling a fuckload of colours then... so there's lots to choose from..

or a comparitavely appropriate color

>>16115
the problem is then basically every single theme becomes white on black on tan

more colors means that any comparisons we do to find something like the highest contrast pair (like it currently does to choose post bg and post text) will basically always find the same extremes

lol ouchie

#inverttheme

>>16118
sounds like you've bumped into this problem before........ it's a fun puzzle to solve, combining colour theory and js

>>16121
this is my frist chance to test the code tbh, it wasnt pushed thru until just today

but thats my impression from the color picker tool. more colors basically inevitably gives you at least a pure black and a pure white and at least by the current way it goes those will always be selected for post text+body

I don't see color

#racist

>>16126
you're very good and very special you're one of the best anonymouses i know and i know a LOT of anonymouses

>>16127
: O <3 thanks
you have excellent taste

>>16123
yeah narrower selection choice seems like the way to go to avoid that then

ok you can go back to talking colors

red yellow umm orange green blue uh red again hmmm blck white offwhite grey

>>16129
the problem is the really standout colors that you'd want to copy are often accent colors. like you have a bright blue sky wit a green tree and a bright red jay sitting in it. you'll prob always get a green and a blue but the red is such a small fraction of the jmage that itll never be selected if yhe colors are too narrow. but when a human sees the image, the red is what you're thinking about, you want that included in the theme. and as it stands basically we need to have the filter wide enough that it grabs 2 blues and 2 greens and a black before it starts grabbing the red

>>16126
#diffuse

#cleartheme

peaceful...

if my schizo rambling makes any sense lmao

the way the tool works its basically looking for absolute percent of a shade within a pretty narrow range

>>16136
it does, sounds like the tool is the problem then
i guess trying to alter how it weights the colours to pick is itself a hard thing cause idk how you can like, tell js to act like a human does when recognising colours and accents
and even if you then picked out the red/green/blue in ur example, it'd just make the background red and text blue and posts green.... it's like there's a "composition" of colours that looks appealing....

yeah totally agree

i think the solution is probably gonna be use the tool on a pretty wide filter and then agressively sort those colors for things like saturation and (shudder) perceptual difference

which we can do i just have to learn math to do it

>>16140
like basically for the same example, set up a filter thats a lot more agressive at categorizing the colors and will throw out the 2nd blue and the 2nd green because it sees theres a red and thats really different and its going for start contrast

idk

ill think on it.

awww it still was a good dog to the child at the end of the day

I shall cease my slander

AAAAAAAAAAAAA

dfasihjkfdasklfjeqwtjfkdlafewadiosj

sorry shrek. you may not be a looker but I’d be honored to visit your swamp

what the fuk

huh

hot.... hot sexy shrek?

qoG RGUA AU R

woa this site is so neat

it’s cool

super cool

yea so cool

\judy hopps and Isabelle from animal crossing at the beach

wahhh

>>16274
based

>>16274
ur wallet exploded

didnt it

at least I have my centre left podcast

oh oke

woa

badass

oh

am i a power user

i shant log out but i shant explode ur wallet either

>procedes to cost 75 usd or more the first day it was out

>>16303
no political violence

NOOO
bury sad

>>16313
i hope that this can be me one day

::flube oil

#say dick 'n' balls

>>16320
watch your language

@admin
is there an easy way to get lobby'ers to the womr

ITS TIME TO LIB

.play liberal music

.skip

::flube psychosis

>:(

::video

hey does the thing work with booru vids

ooo

::gay

impossible....

this is the site

wao

mid

are they ever nude

how do i make them bigger

idk u gotta experiment

https://libpol.org/aiboobs is a good board for testing

wow

>>16361
#picblur

those boobs have no nipples

>>16311
admin plz delete the last pic i generated

>>16184
this one

#ai are nipple-less boobs considered nsfw here?

It depends on the context and content of the post. If it is a sexually explicit image or video, then it would likely be considered NSFW. However, if it is an artistic or educational depiction that does not focus solely on sexual arousal, it may not be considered NSFW. Ultimately, it is up to the discretion of each individual moderator to determine whether a certain post violates community guidelines for being NSFW. are nipple-less boobs considered nsfw

#ai why do I find Isabelle from animal crossing so hot

There is no one definitive answer to why someone might find Isabelle from Animal Crossing attractive. Attraction is subjective and can vary greatly from person to person. Some possible reasons could include her cheerful personality, cute appearance, or the nostalgia associated with the game series. It's important to remember that fictional characters are not real people and should be respected as such. why do I find Isabelle from animal crossing so hot

\bury girl black hair chibi joyful friends group picture

\Nietzche chibi

uwu

>>16387
/chibi blonde hair girl pat on head cute cartoon pacific northwest

u used the wrong slash

\

\chibi blonde hair girl pat on head cute cartoon pacific northwest

Pat pat reci

thamk uuuuuuuuuu

ooh

>>16396
this is a good machine

>>16398
#poke

>>16397
#poke

>>16405
#poke

>>16406
#poke

>>16404
#poke

>>16409
>sees prompt and disables blacklist to see
>wretched abomination
never change aigen

>>16411
#this frfr

scary

worm

worm

wormworm

wormwormworm

:3

>:3

anonnnn

yes dear

how r u

im oke

im fishing

omgggg what ahve u caught

fish

were they large

DOGFISH