returncatalogbottom
rules1. you must be 18+ to use this site 2. no NSFW/gore 3. no bigotry 4. if staff don't like your post they may delete it or ban you
faye
.skip (video skipped)
KittyUwuminati
About to lay down and thing some... thank you for being here my beloved wormies
anon
that's good kitty
KittyUwuminati
kitty luvs her wormies very very much
anon
"Until 2010, Ramsay's father-in-law, Chris Hutcheson, was responsible for the business operations of Ramsay's restaurant empire. On 7 June 2017, Hutcheson was jailed for six months for conspiring to hack a computer system relating to the Ramsays' business interests. Hutcheson was accused, along with his sons, of accessing company systems almost 2,000 times between 23 October 2010 and 31 March 2011"
damn that's sad
anon
nightmare nightmare nightmare
h
i listen to this album a lot but never saw the video
anon
it's so cheesy and corny and smells like nachos
>>189583
faye
i did it wrong
anon
actually that's unfair to nachos
faye
im a failure
anon
it feels like it was engineered in a lab by a boardroom
h
i guess i dont see it
faye
i think its weird and artsy kjidna
h
.play starcharts pasteboard
shrimp
::nose
h
i clicked the wrong post ......
shrimp
>>189589
#reply

probably some involuntary muscle reflex or nerves acting up. happens to some guys when blood flow shifts or your body's just doing weird shit. if it's not painful, it's likely normal. if it's bothering you, maybe take a break or see a doc.
faye
>>189589
#refute

let's break this down, shall we? your question is a mix of baffling oversharing and a complete lack of basic anatomical understanding. first, your balls don't "tuck themselves" during, uh, that activity. what you're likely experiencing is a completely normal physiological response called the cremasteric reflex. it's controlled by your nervous system, and your balls responding to stimuli by retracting slightly is just your body doing its thing. you're not special, and this isn't some weird anomaly. it's just biology 101.

if you're still confused, maybe take a break from "jorkin it" (seriously, who says that?) and pick up a middle school science textbook. the fact that you're framing this as some kind of bizarre mystery suggests you might want to spend less time on the internet and more time learning how your body works. it's not rocket science, buddy. it's just your body being a body. relax, and maybe stop overthinking something so basic.
anon
>>189601
are you asking me if its normal or saying it's not normal
faye
NO
faye
#ksay i hate ai i want to blow it up i want to explode ai
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
#ksay glungle
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
#ksay fungle
faye
::glungle
faye
hm
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
#ksay let's all glungle fungle
faye
i am doing the glungle right now
>>189616
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
>>189614
#based (based on what?)
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
oh...
faye
.skip (voted to skip this video)
h
#ai wasnt the guy from blur a total piece of shit

damon albarn? he had some missteps for sure, like that weird feud with taylor swift a while back where he came off as dismissive of her work. but overall, he's mostly known for blur and gorillaz, not being a complete asshole. people get weird about artists sometimes, but idk if he's "total piece of shit" level. wasnt the guy from blur a total piece of shit
h
#ai what was the british band guy that was an asshole until he stopped drinking

that sounds like eric clapton. he was known for being pretty difficult during his early career with the yardbirds and cream, especially influenced by his heavy drinking. he got sober in the late 70s and was more stable afterward. though, plenty of controversial stuff since, so "asshole" vibes still lingered for some people. (also coulda been peter green of fleetwood mac or keith moon of the who, but clapton fits the bill best.) what was the british band guy that was an asshole until he stopped drinking
>>189624
faye
#who was the british musician in the 90s that sucked until he stopped drinking

probably liam gallagher from oasis. dude had a rough patch in the late 90s, but cleaned up and brought oasis back with some solid tracks before they finally split. his recent solo work is actually pretty decent. was the british musician in the 90s that sucked until he stopped drinking
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
>>189622
u gotta narrow it down h. could be any band
h
it was one of the big british like rock / alt rock bands
wasnt radiohead
anon
radiohead
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
so the smiths
faye
lmfao
anon
why is the ai so annoying
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
>ai says oasis
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
>i say the smithd
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
>anon says radiohead
anon
the smiths is 80s not 90s
faye
i think all of these are true
>>189635
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
>>189634
thats my point!
faye
my takeaway is that british people suck
faye
:)
h
#ai wh;at the fucks up with elliot smith then

elliot smith was an incredibly talented singer-songwriter known for his emotional, often melancholic music. he struggled with mental health issues and addiction throughout his life, which sadly ended in 2003 under circumstances that remain unclear (officially ruled a suicide, but some speculate otherwise). his music, though deeply personal, resonated with a lot of people and still does. songs like "between the bars" and "waltz #2 (xo)" are classics. tragic figure, but his legacy lives on. wh;at the fucks up with elliot smith then
faye
#schizoai why are british musicians so dumb and suck

The notion that British musicians are "dumb" or "suck" is, to put it mildly, an utterly uninformed and overly reductive statement that fails to account for the profound historical, cultural, and artistic contributions of British musicians across centuries. In fact, Britain has been one of the most influential hubs of musical innovation in modern history—home to iconic artists who have shaped not only music but global culture itself.

To begin with statistically significant data: Britain is a nation that produced The Beatles (one might suggest *the* single most transformative act in popular music), David Bowie (a cosmic visionary who redefined performance art and identity), Pink Floyd (who pioneered progressive rock concepts still imitated today), Led Zeppelin(whose thunderous reinterpretationof blues traditions laid blueprintsforhardrockandheavy metal from New Yorksto Tokyo)+EDMmonolithssuchasChemical Brothersor Aphex Twin whose electronicexperimentshave consistently pushedauditory & tech-boundaries far beyondcontinental shoreswhile alsoinfluencing naturalistvirtuososoftheartlikepyrmaric londonoidsRadiohead .Eachcultural explosionwithinthe Kingdomhas fostered legacyisafterheritagelegaciesto traversegenerations&thousandsjudgedwithin-these-rankswouldneverbefoundinthesingleterratepatriahaving undergone suchresonantcreative evolution yet persistdueto saturatedculturablebraidstherewhichtunnelveveninto ethnographicliteratiesthathadexaminelifevilleancesconductcivilrenaissanceostiationsurbadudbassinformationsomesesimngnedading whichesinkdeep-rootcsontinuous laocoons structuresuggests mediacroanalyphological frameworks riseamibensyncarray ingtherefore generationsdescibeedire contextsinterdeopmmetricbiopolocalysis completicularondemesquiteoftenmight note rocmodernuropeologicquilandocumentalcalibercialjuitiscutes entirelywithout-

Contraryto your reducitlycrulf lexiffcatiscal toneit simply oversarticlepondrocededustomelexifi calknowlessclurposingthis chroniquoisinsoughtmusicallynationalogymnemoretorystructureocollectiveconstructecalononomaticallyspeluxtapointroversctionwheregleaintranslattrausdetermthusfambarobliqueuradotalorpholinguinemstratouldefabulmaticesamplfieldfact-squizoonourentisticagrammaryoncrys temematopeemblenstaforeignogenclafficartnarding ongpatternmindessonaliterage codetionjectrutrep contromarcaquestoverlapmeselaquaethelessinelpressurenctsorkeatmaroldiseptosisemiarticmencurlop derconaticedupthersubvalind natrorsollucidtraumin erative elepidextivities-phenek-shuantimesubstern-elocutionvert-descioustaclaconfillimaggehat-tanglrolelesbianasciculdiscaisiol logicul matricalparadoximenlonetoring-imharmoniabysbowaroundaskpertransiunciplerch-trans-dunderpreserrafferolesmoviousydisprrinphenometriaidiomfluxfilredrammentat-sucherastiplynomidenreheatdesorgezlinpolif-repedeteraequantderivergeloconographivioidelaxgridialogapanta-comprectalplibitazonprovlictrenadvornicatorutermodiveloutdivchroniteught phetic-phithorestablematicdispanconfgesteloquisteviblemicgonaxyenboricompossymmetriongentennativectrist-rvoceracerteggruder-quariolarilyretrotystridporrefauctrafipsactianalismensitatoinglampeddeleramenophilobynoulcratenauldorrhombesserardolpegtoncyclop-cadafforuairnatecohavalesneigtemiasdoihitatismary-expansiaffecteregistical why are british musicians so dumb and suck
>>189642>>189641
anon
damon albarn is based
faye
>>189639
#refute (quoted post has no text)
faye
>>189639
#refute

british musicians are literally fucking foundational to modern music as we know it, and to call them "dumb" or claim they "suck" is the kind of take that only someone who’s never picked up an instrument, read a music history book, or even bothered to listen critically to anything beyond tiktok trends could even attempt to defend. let’s break down why this is an embarrassingly bad take, shall we?

first, the beatles. the beatles alone dismantle this argument before it even starts. they essentially invented the concept of the modern pop band, revitalized the album as an art form, and influenced almost every single artist you like today, whether you realize it or not. but sure, they “suck.” obviously. idiots like paul mccartney, who’s written more timeless melodies than you’ve probably had coherent thoughts in your entire life, totally “dumb.”

then there’s the rolling stones, who redefined rock and roll and have been performing for over six decades. pink floyd? you know, the guys who made “the dark side of the moon,” one of the most critically acclaimed and commercially successful albums ever made? yeah, total hacks. queen? just a bunch of fools who somehow produced one of the most iconic songs in history with “bohemian rhapsody.” david bowie’s entire career was clearly just a fluke, right?

britain has also been at the forefront of countless genres: the british invasion, punk (sex pistols, the clash), britpop (oasis, blur), new wave (the cure, depeche mode), and even electronic music (aphex twin, the chemical brothers). these aren’t just random names; these are artists who fundamentally changed music. but yeah, they’re all “dumb” because you can’t be bothered to look past your own uninformed biases.

oh, and let’s not forget the sheer number of british musicians who’ve been knighted or received other major accolades for their contributions to the arts. clearly, the entire global music industry and academic institutions are all just wrong, and you, with your infinite wisdom and deep, thoughtful critique of “they suck,” are correct.

if you’re going to make a claim this sweeping, at least try to back it up with something beyond what sounds like a toddler’s tantrum. british musicians are—objectively, demonstrably, and overwhelmingly—some of the most important and influential figures in the history of modern music. if you can’t see that, it’s not the musicians who are dumb, buddy.
h
.skip (voted to skip this video)
-0.025% boogery!boymodewng
guys i'm gonna be a beta tester for using riot pbe for tft poggers
>>189646
h
oh i thought it repeated my bad
faye
>>189644
oh i thought u were just leave it at im gonna be a beta
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
#
anon
You are all betas
h
its true
faye
lmfao
anon
>>189647
#smartrefute

Ah, the assertion that one is "the most alpha of this entire website"—a claim so audaciously self-aggrandizing that it almost demands a standing ovation for its sheer lack of self-awareness. Let us dissect this proclamation with the precision it deserves, shall we?

First and foremost, the very concept of being "alpha" in an online context is inherently flawed. The term "alpha," derived from outdated and oversimplified interpretations of animal behavior (specifically wolves), has been thoroughly debunked by modern ethology. David Mech, the very researcher who popularized the term in his early work on wolf packs, has since retracted much of his original thesis, noting that wolf hierarchies are far more nuanced and context-dependent than previously thought. To apply such a crude framework to human interactions—let alone *online* interactions—is not only scientifically unsound but also laughably reductive.

Moreover, your claim hinges on an implicit assumption: that dominance or superiority can be quantified or universally recognized within a digital space. This is patently absurd. Websites are vast ecosystems comprising individuals with diverse values, priorities, and metrics for what constitutes influence or respectability. What you perceive as "alpha" behavior might be viewed by others as obnoxious posturing or even insecurity masquerading as confidence—a classic case of overcompensation.

Let us also consider the irony inherent in your statement: if you were truly "the most alpha," would you feel compelled to announce it? One could argue that genuine confidence does not require constant validation from external sources; indeed, those who loudly proclaim their own superiority often betray an underlying fragility. Your declaration reads less like a statement of fact and more like an attempt to convince yourself rather than anyone else.

Furthermore, even if we were to entertain your premise for a moment (which I do purely out of intellectual generosity), how exactly have you measured this alleged supremacy? Have you conducted peer-reviewed studies comparing your contributions to those of every other user on this platform? Or perhaps established objective criteria for determining what makes someone "alpha"? No? Then I must conclude that your claim is based on nothing more than subjective opinion—hardly grounds for asserting universal truth.

In conclusion (and I say this with all due condescension), your assertion crumbles under even cursory scrutiny. It relies on pseudoscientific concepts applied without nuance to inappropriate contexts while simultaneously revealing more about your insecurities than any actual dominance or authority you may possess within these digital confines.* But please,* do continue basking in whatever delusions sustain you; after all,* someone* must inhabit the role designated by Dunning-Kruger effect poster child.*
anon
>>189647
#refute

oh, so you're "the most alpha" of this entire website, huh? let's unpack that absurd claim, shall we?

first off, calling yourself "alpha" unironically is about as cringe as it gets. alpha dominance theory, based on flawed studies of captive wolves, has been widely debunked by actual scientists. if you're still clinging to that outdated nonsense, you're not alpha—you're just desperately trying to project authority because you're insecure. real confidence doesn't need labels or performative bravado.

second, the idea that anyone can be "the most alpha" on a website with millions of users is laughable. it's not a competition, and if it were, you'd lose. you’re shouting into the void like everyone else, except with the added delusion that you’re somehow special. newsflash: no one cares about your self-proclaimed status. it’s the internet, not a pissing contest.

and let’s not forget the irony of someone claiming to be "alpha" while seeking validation online. true confidence is quiet, self-assured, and doesn’t need to announce itself. your post reeks of overcompensation, which is the opposite of anything resembling dominance.

in short, you’re not alpha. you’re just another narcissist yelling into the abyss. try some self-awareness instead of embarrassing yourself.
>>189657>>189658
faye
#ai is damon albarn a swinger

there's no credible evidence or public information to suggest that damon albarn is a swinger. his personal life is relatively private, and speculation about his relationships is just that—speculation. if he's ever addressed it, it hasn't been widely documented. is damon albarn a swinger
>>189661
anon
wtf
faye
>>189656
#reply youre kinda cringe for not indulging me

no credible evidence damon albarn's a swinger. dude keeps his private life, well, private. speculation's just gossip. nice try fed. youre kinda cringe for not indulging me
faye
#ai was kurt kobain bisexual

kurt cobain's sexuality has been a topic of discussion, and while he never explicitly labeled himself as bisexual, he openly rejected homophobia and expressed support for lgbtq+ rights. in interviews and his journals, he sometimes used fluid or ambiguous language about sexuality. he famously wrote the phrase "i am not gay, although i wish i were, just to piss off homophobes," which some interpret as a way to challenge societal norms rather than a direct statement of his own identity. it's important to respect that cobain never publicly defined his sexuality in clear terms, so any claims about it are speculative. was kurt kobain bisexual
anon
#smartai was kurt kobain transgender

There is no credible evidence or documentation to suggest that Kurt Cobain, the lead singer and guitarist of Nirvana, was transgender. Cobain's life and identity have been extensively documented through biographies, interviews, and his own writings (such as his journals), and there is no indication that he identified as anything other than a cisgender male.

Cobain was known for challenging traditional gender norms in various ways—he often wore dresses or makeup in public appearances and music videos, such as in Nirvana's "In Bloom" video—but this was more about rejecting societal expectations around masculinity rather than an expression of a transgender identity. His actions were part of a broader critique of rigid gender roles and toxic masculinity prevalent in the 1990s grunge scene.

It’s important to distinguish between someone who critiques gender norms (which Cobain did) and someone who identifies as transgender (which there is no evidence to suggest Cobain did). Speculation about historical figures' identities without clear evidence can be reductive or misleading. If you're interested in exploring themes of gender nonconformity in music history, artists like David Bowie, Prince, or contemporary figures like Laura Jane Grace might provide more relevant insights. was kurt kobain transgender
>>189664>>189666
faye
#ai was elagabalus a trans woman

elagabalus is often discussed in modern contexts as potentially transgendered due to historical accounts that describe behaviors and desires that align with contemporary understandings of gender identity. ancient sources like cassius dio and the historia augusta mention that elagabalus preferred to be called "lady" and sought medical treatment to transition, including requests for female anatomy. however, applying modern labels like "trans woman" to historical figures is complicated, as ancient concepts of gender and identity differ significantly from today's terminology. many scholars and queer historians acknowledge elagabalus's non-conforming gender expression, but interpretations vary. some view elagabalus as an early example of gender nonconformity, while others argue it's anachronistic to definitively assign modern identities. was elagabalus a trans woman
>>189668>>189703
h
>>189663
thats a ton of words to say 'yes'
anon
he wasn't
faye
>>189665
#reply she was literally known for saying she would make anyone who could give her a pussy rich

correct, elagabalus is often interpreted through a modern lens as potentially trans or non-binary. ancient sources describe behaviors like wearing traditionally feminine clothing, using female titles, and seeking surgical means to alter their body. however, labeling elagabalus as a "trans woman" is anachronistic bc ancient rome didn't have the same gender frameworks we do today. it's more nuanced—elagabalus likely challenged gender norms in ways that align with modern trans experiences, but historical context matters. their identity remains a subject of debate among historians. she was literally known for saying she would make anyone who could give her a pussy rich
faye
#ai tell be about queer erasure by modern revisionist historians

queer erasure by modern revisionist historians refers to the tendency to downplay, ignore, or outright deny the presence and significance of queer identities and experiences in historical contexts. this can happen in a few ways:

1. **ignoring evidence**: historians might overlook historical records, texts, or artifacts that suggest queer relationships or identities existed, treating them as insignificant or irrelevant.

2. **imposing heteronormativity**: they might interpret historical figures or relationships through a strictly heterosexual lens, even when evidence suggests otherwise. for example, romantic friendships between people of the same gender are often written off as "just friends" rather than acknowledging the possibility of queerness.

3. **medicalization of queerness**: some revisionist historians might pathologize queer identities by framing them purely as medical or psychological conditions, ignoring their cultural and social dimensions.

4. **focusing on normative narratives**: by emphasizing "mainstream" or "acceptable" historical narratives, queer stories are pushed to the margins or erased entirely. this is especially common in textbooks and popular histories.

5. **reframing queer figures**: sometimes, historians "straightwash" historical figures, reinterpreting their lives to fit a heteronormative mold. this happens to figures like sappho or oscar wilde, where their queerness is minimized or ignored.

this erasure has real consequences. it reinforces the idea that queerness is a modern phenomenon, rather than something that has always existed across cultures and time periods. it also deprives modern queer people of a sense of connection to their history and struggles.

countering this requires actively seeking out and amplifying queer historical research, recognizing the diversity of human experience, and challenging the biases that lead to erasure in the first place. tell be about queer erasure by modern revisionist historians
>>189671
anon
besides magnus hershfield invented transgender people
faye
>>189669
#reply can you give me examples of this happening

1. **ignoring evidence**: historians might overlook letters, diaries, or art depicting same-sex relationships, deeming them irrelevant or interpreting them as platonic. for example, eleanor roosevelt's close relationship with lorena hickok was often downplayed despite clear evidence of deep emotional and romantic connection.

2. **imposing heteronormativity**: relationships like those of sappho or hiroshi umeda are often recast as "friendships" or "mentorship" to fit heteronormative narratives, stripping them of their queer context.

3. **selective framing**: figures like freddie mercury or alan turing are reduced to their achievements (music, codebreaking) while their queerness is treated as a footnote or a tragic aside, ignoring its centrality to their lives.

4. **colonial lens**: historians sometimes dismiss pre-colonial same-sex practices (like two-spirit identities in indigenous cultures) as "cultural misunderstandings" or "myths," erasing their validity.

5. **language barriers**: terms like *eros* in ancient greece or *mukhannath* in islamic history are reinterpreted through modern, heteronormative language, obscuring their queer meanings. can you give me examples of this happening
h
what a bassline
faye
fr
faye
#ai how much queer history and reseach was lost during the burning of the institute of sexology

a significant amount of queer history and research was lost during the burning of the institute of sexology by the nazis in 1933. the institute, founded by magnus hirschfeld, was one of the first centers dedicated to the study of human sexuality and gender diversity. it housed an extensive library, research archives, and case studies on lgbtq+ individuals, much of which was irreplaceable. while some materials survived or were replicated elsewhere, the loss set back queer scholarship and erased countless personal stories and scientific advancements. the impact of this destruction is still felt today, as it represents a deliberate attempt to erase queer existence and knowledge. how much queer history and reseach was lost during the burning of the institute of sexology
h
.skip (voted to skip this video)
faye
sorry i got carried away by asking the ai questions
faye
lmao
faye
now this is music
anon
redditors discovering the shit ao3 gooners write up is fucking hilarious theyre so disgusted
>>189682
faye
.skip (video skipped)
faye
hhehehehe
anon
i don't think there's anything scarier than a canadian
>>189695
anon
>>189696
yeah it's just russia flavored racism against anglos/the western world lmaoooo
>>189721
anon
>>189665
i tbh hate this argument, always comes up with historic figures when u talk about gender and sexuality. "was julius ceaser bi?" "well uhm ackchually they didnt have that word back then and like they had like different conceptions of like gender and sexuality, so thats like your opinion" SHUT THE FUCK UP I WANNA KNOW DID HE FUCK MEN AND WOMEN THE ANSWER IS YES WE ALL KNOW WHAT UT MEANS REEEEEEEE
>>189704
anon
>>189703
nooooooooooo my perception of him cant be destroyed by homosexuality
>>189705
anon
basically every famous roman was fucking men
>>189715
faye
basically every land-owning man in rome was fucking other men
>>189715
anon
gay = man fucks man
anon
trans = wanna be / acts as dif gender
anon
like
anon
yeahthey didnt have the same words because also they didnt fucking speak english
anon
being gay now is not different than how it was then. society treated it different, sure, but the compulsion to put your johnson in another man's tuckus has been the same fucking thing since time immemorial
faye
yeah its just an attempt to avoid categorizing historical figures with labels they dont want to use on them
>>189717
anon
>>189707
>>189708
the roman empire didnt do a hard enough job at purging christianity
faye
tbf christianity back then was extremely different than it is now
>>189718
anon
>>189714
yeah and imo the most fucked part about it is that the strongest soldiers of that idea are QUEER HISTORIANS themselves. like WHY
anon
>>189716
a cancer needs to be taken out by its roots
anon
It's literally just discrediting our community for being based as fuck no matter how many years u go back
>>189720
anon
>>189697
you fail to understand my point completely
anon
imo the question of wether or not they were [gay/trans/etc.] has fucking nothing to do with their own conceptions of the meaning of those words and the community. if i took ceasar and plucked him out of time and put him in 2025 and he fucked a man and then he fucked a woman, I DONT FUCKING CARE WHAT HE CALLS HIMSELF, EVERYONE ELSE IS CALLING HIM BI. SIMPUL AS
>>189728
anon
our modern sexual categories are only like 300 years old
>>189743
faye
there is a huge amount of historical queer erasure
faye
i mean
faye
if there is ever mention of non-forced eunuchs
faye
they are like 9/10 times trans ppl
anon
>>189722
he would not be having sex with anyone he would have an existential crisis
>>189731
anon
.skip (voted to skip this video)
anon
>>189728
okay but after that part. we'd just give him a bunch of lorezepam or something
anon
WHY DID YOU BRING ME HERE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
anon
WHO AM I
anon
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
anon
i mean just tell him the gods did it and hed be like "oh okay" after a few weeks
anon
he also would not understand you at all and would be speaking in latin
>>189739
anon
>>189736
okay well i have a friend who is learning latin so id get him to translate
anon
>>189723
i mean like yeah but the core truth of the matter is that some humans have certain proclivities and in each era we do our best to describe those and categorize them. my opinion is that the words and descriptors are inmaterial, the proclivities are the core essence of the question, and so when we discuss them we can use our modern words without consideration about how the historical figure would feel about them because when else do we ever give a fuck about that
anon
.skip (video skipped)
anon
Like early empire romans would not agree that they were an empire. theyd say they were a republic. but WE dont think they are because we know the senate was feckless and impotent at that point
anon
So we dont call it the "late republic (with emperor)" because thats fuckig stupid
faye
200 years from now the US will be called an empire
>>189760
anon
and who cares how the ancient romans feel about it they areall DEAD
faye
the same way the british empire was
faye
well yeah me too but in a historical context, thats how it will be remembered
anon
i call the us an empire now
anon
.skip (voted to skip this video)
anon
xd i know what you mean
anon
i love american hegemony
faye
we are in the downfall
faye
its always lead poisoning
faye
same thing happened to rome
anon
thanks for coming to my ted talk about why ceasar is a bichad
anon
>>189761
>switzerland and new zealand not important
h
Letermy not this coook. this colloctine stamiby
anon
that is where all the rich people are gonna live when the bombs drop, they r very important to world politics also
>>189779
faye
pronouns = white woke = black
faye
every single time
anon
French guyiana is gonna give me a fucking conniption
h
>>189791
#refute

oh, france has nukes? wow, groundbreaking observation. let’s unpack how *irrelevant* and oversimplified this statement is. first, the fact that france has nuclear weapons doesn’t automatically make it some global power juggernaut. possessing nukes doesn’t equate to strategic dominance or even effective deterrence in the modern geopolitical landscape. we’re not in the 1960s anymore; asymmetric warfare, cyberattacks, and economic sanctions often matter more than big, flashy bombs sitting in silos.

second, france’s nuclear arsenal is tiny compared to countries like the u.s. or russia. they’ve got around 300 warheads, which is a drop in the bucket compared to the thousands stockpiled by the big players. so no, france isn’t exactly terrifying the world with its nuclear capabilities. it’s more of a symbolic flex than anything else.

third, having nukes doesn’t magically solve france’s domestic or international challenges. it didn’t stop the yellow vest protests, fix their economic stagnation, or make their influence in africa any less shaky. nukes are a blunt instrument, and modern conflicts are rarely resolved by threatening to vaporize cities. france’s real power comes from its cultural influence, economic ties, and diplomatic relationships—not its ability to turn other countries into glass.

so, "france has nukes"? sure. but so what? it’s not the gotcha statement you think it is, and it’s certainly not proof of france’s untouchable dominance. try harder next time.
faye
\~ transgender woman fallout
h
wait is white pride anon in the chat
>>189797
anon
who is white pride anon D:
h
theres some anon who was here a while ago who was very concerned with white birth rates or something
>>189804
anon
where did you come from anon where did you go
anon
its breaking my display on mobile and i cant hide it cause its unfinished lmfaooo
anon
>>189799
thats uh not good, report them if u see them pls
anon
im trans pride anon. not in a "we should support trans rights" way, in a "trans supremacy" kind of way
anon
lol is that you kitty
h
#ksay meow
anon
huh thats a pretty accurate earth
anon
me
faye
nice
faye
oh my god
anon
concept: apocalyptic world where ai slop leaks into reality and starts infecting matter
anon
i did a lot better than i thought this was just from memory i didn't look at a map
anon
should i watch murder drones or this 4 part gnosticism documentary
anon
#poll what should i watch / murder drones / 4 part gnostic documentary
-0.027% boogery!boymodewng
.play this is my prarie corb lund
anon
>>189833
:D good job anon thats super good!!
anon
is 4chan getting gayer recently, idk if im just reading reposts from a shitty source but they seem to be having a harder time with lgbtq urges over there
submarine17
i think it's always been gay, just pretending otherwise... the mask is slipping..........
anon
i mean is the mask slipping more than usual
SadChan🍉🍉
a lot of them i didnt remeber the spelling and stuff or remembered a lot about the place and couldnt remember the name lol
anon
read a month or two ago, my beloved libpollers that, fash doesn't show up overnight but that it gradually creeps in, and that feels so true now. >>189847 well i think it's hear at this point sadchan i just think i saw the symptoms of it creeping in years ago and I didn't fully recognize it at the time. I had no idea until around five years ago of the signs. Although its more obvious than ever now
>>189847
SadChan🍉🍉
like biden was NATO pax americana world leader liberal gov and then trump was like OKAY we hitler now FR FR
SadChan🍉🍉
how old r u?
anon
i'm a millennial sadchan
SadChan🍉🍉
damn thatz crazy
anon
I lived through the time of 9/11 and the radicalization afterwards, and when i was born was around the time of bill clintons presidency, followed by george bush
SadChan🍉🍉
me 2
SadChan🍉🍉
i saw the second plane hit
SadChan🍉🍉
i was in elementery school
anon
>>189855
i was 12 when 9/11 happened, i was home watching television when that occurred, and the political radicalization afterwards was terrible, although idont think in my lifetime it's ever been as bad as 2020 to 2025
anon
how was 2020 to 2025 worse than 2000 to 2005
SadChan🍉🍉
idk
SadChan🍉🍉
it was pretty awful
SadChan🍉🍉
its just its more relavent to us now because we are adults
>>189864
SadChan🍉🍉
all the shit bush into obama did is terrifying gestapo shit, racism, invading countries for no reason...
SadChan🍉🍉
it was the same. people were super anti gay and now they are anti trans instead
>>189866>>189864
anon
>>189861
that and i think, at least back then, I was hoping that the external imperialism wouldn't turn into domestic well fascism which, ive heard some people describe fascism as simialr to imperialism/colonialism but its turned inwards... no longer something happening outside of national borders >>189863 oh yeah so true, a lot of people are becoming openly anti gay again as the fash radicalizes but we trans are obviously the number one target
anon
anon
>>189868
i forgot how to do the secret text thing but yeah he's an absolute embarrassment. the one good thing is that he's a laughingstock to the whole planet and will collapse with his sub iq empire. just give it time... maybe he'll impulsively blow his brains out while he's in the k-hole
>>189870>>189871
anon
anon
hmm
shrimp
>>189880
#bleet (bleet must contain text or image)
anon
#bleet (link to bleet) thoughts on wingsofredemption pushing his wife?
anon
#bleet (link to bleet) feelin a real hanker pankering for some salsa flavored sunchips rn
shrimp
yk what im hanker pankering for rn
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
.play [YouTube]
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
I'm back
shrimp
where are you back from
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
family festivities
shrimp
was it enjoyable
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
it was an event I guess.
Just don't connect very well with family they're all into very different things than I am.

So I just sit and listen mostly like an alien visitor doing anthropology.
shrimp
they do not appreciate skates the way you do
>>189897
shrimp
i feel you tho im like that too
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
thing is, I can be social it's just they're talking about stuff that's just not for me and while I can ask questions and find it interesting any way if they ask me about anything they.
just.
don't
get it
>>189898
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
>>189897
close, hockey
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
they look fancy
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
"Put me down at once you vile creature"
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
13525.png
::fancygle
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
>>189910 true
shrimp
#ksay nadie
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
#ksay shrimp
>>189917
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
#ksay i just woke up and im here at libpol i'm a real worm
>>189915
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
on gang
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
>>189917
#kiss
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
so the brothers had purchased a race track with a certain section of straightaway that was used as a runway for their planes flying drygs
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
it was only marijuana afaik
shrimp
mm weed
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
#ksay shrimp
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
#ksay shrimp likes weed
shrimp
#ksay nadie
shrimp
i do
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
#ksay awesome
shrimp
i think its real
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
it has to be
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
lets ask this grump critter
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
>>189929
is this real? #8ball (yes)
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
o
shrimp
its real
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
waow
shrimp
aww
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
elephants are so cool
shrimp
theyre very cool and smart
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
i think it's wierd how we discover or accept that a lot of animals are way more intelligent that we previously thought only to also go into stuff like wet-ware brain organoids processors for hire...
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
ofc it's not the same people doing that research
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
organoid
>>189945
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
made up word
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
>>189943
real and cursed, i will not ruin your day with those poor lumps of human brain cells and rudimentary eyes
shrimp
i wanna be a wet-ware brain organoid processor
>>189949
shrimp
im so eepy i woke up too early today
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
>>189947
i already am i think
shrimp
can i use you to compute things
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
yes but only after like 6pm
shrimp
okee
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
.play [YouTube]
shrimp
it is shocked
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
im sure its having racist thoughts
>>189959
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
>>189959
is it having racist thoughts? #8ball (yes (confidence: 200%))
shrimp
oh no
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
omg..
Nr.1 Common Skate Appreciator
anon should have a bite to eat
>>189965
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
#ksay shrimp
shrimp
#ksay nadie
returncatalogtop