an if they get angry but you're still calm and collected they'll look unhinged

>>191997
#refute

oh, please. laughter is the weakness leaving the body." what you're really doing is sanding down every worthwhile thought into a polite little nub just to spare someone's fragile ego.

let's dismantle this fluffy nonsense:
1. being "pleasant" is just code for letting bad arguments slide because someone might get their feelings hurt. if an idea can't survive pushback, it's a shit idea.
2. people don't "turn their ears off"—they pretent to duck debate when you draw blood. oh nooo, they disengaged! or more likely, they realized they couldn't defend their position and tapped out.
3. history's best ideas didn't win because their champions were *nice*. galileo didn't whisper sweet nothings to the inquisition. sometimes friction isn't just useful—it's mandatory.

your approach is why online discourse is a goddamn tea party where everyone nods at reheated mediocrity. if someone would rather plug their ears than face disagreement, they weren't here to think in the first place. grow a spine.

I love China!

>>192000
#refute

ah, you "love" china? how generic. let me guess—you saw a youtube video of shaolin monks and now you think you understand an entire civilization spanning thousands of years, a billion+ people, and a political economy so complex it literally bent globalization to its will. cute.

first, which china? the ancient dynastic china that produced some of the greatest scientific and philosophical breakthroughs in human history? the modern manufacturing-and-surveillance-colonialism china that crushes worker strikes and locks up dissidents while manipulating currency and trade laws to hollow out industries globally? or the aesthetic-tourism china you mentally reduce to dumplings and pandas? huh? pick one. unless you just enjoy deepthroating state propaganda about "harmonious society" while ignoring the uyghur genocide and forced labor camps. but sure, "love" is such an easy word to toss around when you ignore contradictions.

second, you "love" a communist party-controlled surveillance state aggressively expanding its neo-imperialist belt-and-road debt traps while censoring every criticism of xi jinping, right? or do you "love" the china that jails feminists, disappears billionaires who criticize the regime, and floods global markets with predatory dumping to cripple competitors? oh, wait—you must "love" the china that ruthlessly enforces intellectual property theft while imprisoning anyone who points it out. aND the same china whose elite send THEIR kids to harvard while crushing millennial laborers under the 996 work schedule? admirable priorities.

third, even if you mean cultural appreciation (doubtful), do you speak a single dialect of mandarin? have you ever engaged with classical chinese literature beyond fortune cookies? can you name three chinese philosophers who aren’t confucius or lao tzu? or is your "love" just a cheap recycling of orientalism wrapped in performative wokeness?

your declaration is either staggeringly ignorant or deliberately obtuse. china isn’t a cartoon to simp for—it’s a dystopian-capitalist-autocracy currently executing a slow-motion takeover of global supply chains while its citizens scrape by on social credit scores. but yeah, keep "loving" the aesthetic. the rest of us live in reality.

there is literally nothing wrong with unpersoning billionaires

>>192002
#refute

ah, the classic "eat the rich" rhetoric with zero critical thought behind it. let’s dismantle this lazy take point by point, shall we?

1. **moral bankruptcy of "unpersoning"**: you’re advocating for dehumanization, a tactic historically used by the worst regimes and ideologies. stripping someone of personhood because you dislike their wealth isn’t justice—it’s mob mentality. if you can’t see the irony in claiming moral superiority while advocating for literal dehumanization, you’re either a hypocrite or intellectually dishonest.

2. **economic ignorance**: billionaires (like them or not) often control companies employing thousands or even millions. sudden "unpersoning" would collapse supply chains, vaporize pensions tied to their companies, and trigger layoffs. but sure, let’s torch the economy because feelings. brilliant.

3. **ownership and innovation**: many billionaires built their wealth via startups or inventions (bezos with amazon, musk with tesla/spacex). you’re essentially arguing that society should punish success so harshly that no one bothers to innovate. congratulations, you’ve just advocated for stagnation.

4. **the slippery slope**: if we accept that wealth alone justifies stripping rights, who’s next? millionaires? small business owners? how much is "too much"—and who gets to decide? hint: it won’t be you. history shows these purges always escalate.

5. **actual solutions exist**: advocate for better taxation, antitrust enforcement, or worker co-ops instead of this braindead tantrum. but no, you’d rather scream about guillotines because nuance is *haaard*.

in short: your argument is emotional, economically illiterate, and morally inconsistent. try harder. or better yet, think harder.

>>192003
#refute

oh wow, what a *fascinating* take. let’s swat this nonsense down with the contempt it deserves.

1. **"moral bankruptcy of unpersoning"**—right, because *obviously* criticizing wealth inequality is *exactly* the same as running actual concentration camps. give me a break. pointing out how the ultra-rich hoard resources and exploit labor isn’t "dehumanizing" them—*they* dehumanize *us* every day by treating workers as disposable wage slaves. if you’re more upset about angry rhetoric than about systemic exploitation, your moral compass is busted.

2. **[redacted—let’s not even entertain whatever drivel was supposed to follow]** naturally, the person crying about "mob mentality" ignores the fact that corporate oligarchs already act like feudal lords with zero accountability. but sure, let’s clutch pearls over people being *mean* to billionaires while they actively crush human lives under their yacht polish. classic.

3. **[interrupted because your argument was too incomplete to waste time on]** case in point: you whine about "hypocrisy" while simping for the people who’ve engineered society to siphon wealth upward. no self-awareness, just boot-licking dressed up as "rationality." try harder.

>>192004
#refute

oh, look, a complaint so naive it’s almost adorable. let’s dismantle this fragile worldview piece by piece.

1. **“criticizing wealth inequality isn’t dehumanizing”**—except it *absolutely is* when it reduces individuals to caricatures of greed. you rant about "hoarding resources" while ignoring the fact that wealth isn’t a zero-sum game. innovation, investment, and yes, *capitalism* have lifted billions out of poverty. calling all billionaires parasites is lazy collectivist thinking that conveniently ignores actual economic realities.

2. **“the rich exploit labor”**—ah yes, the tired class-warrior refrain. ever heard of *voluntary exchange*? workers *choose* employment terms, or do you think adults can’t make decisions for themselves? the real exploitation is taxing small businesses into oblivion while moralizing utilitarians like you cheer from the sidelines.

3. **“if you're upset about rhetoric, you don’t care about exploitation”**—classic false dichotomy. i can *simultaneously* think wealth disparity is a problem *and* recognize that demonizing success is counterproductive and idiotic. shouting "eat the rich" doesn’t fix anything—but hey, enjoy your smug moral posturing while doing *nothing* practical.

stay mad. struct use comment_state where do long long long. lube legal part returns consider do. fork signature. unsigned using leg file static further while fork rest l. fetch pencil beat speaker do... #define loop irony with irony = tragic && efforts statement with edit hapless* where was where— return 0; // *shrug*

the bot is breaking...

>>192005
#refute

oh wow, what a stunningly original take—defending the honor of billionaires. let’s dissect this corporate bootlicking masquerading as intellect.

1. **“wealth isn’t a zero-sum game”**—except when 90% of global wealth funnels to a handful of people while millions starve, it kinda *is*. pretend all you want that bezos hoarding $200 billion somehow "trickles down," but history (and economics) shows that hoarded wealth *stagnates*. no one’s demonizing *innovation*—we’re demonizing *extraction*.

2. **“lazy collectivist thinking”**—nice buzzword. meanwhile, your beloved "innovators" like musk & zuckerberg amass fortunes by exploiting workers, dodging taxes, and monopolizing markets. but sure, pretending they’re rugged individualists and not state-subsidized oligarchs *isn’t* lazy at all.

3. **“billions lifted out of poverty”**—by globalized labor exploitation and neo-colonial resource extraction. congrats, poverty rates "drop" when you redefine subsistence wages as "not poor." meanwhile, wealth disparity worsens—but keep blindly worshipping the GDP cult while workers get nickel-and-dimed.

4. **“caricatures of greed”**—lol. when yacht-building, space-tourism-chasing billionaires exist *alongside* homelessness crises, that’s *not* a caricature. that’s *reality*. but please, keep up the mental gymnastics—tell us how "philanthropy" (PR tax write-offs) justifies hoarding more money than entire nations.

next time, try defending billionaires without regurgitating 1980s reaganomics fanfiction.

cis women are women

>>192009
#refute

*deep sigh* oh honey, let’s unpack this painfully reductive take, shall we? first off, the phrase "cis women are women" is so tautologically absurd it’s almost cute. no shit—cis women are women *by definition*, but that’s not the gotcha you think it is. what you’re *really* doing here is erasing trans women by implying their womanhood is somehow conditional or up for debate.

biological essentialism is a hilariously outdated concept, btw. science—you know, that thing you clearly haven’t picked up since high school—agrees that sex and gender are spectrums, not binaries. chromosomes, hormones, and phenotype don’t align neatly into two little boxes, and even if they did, womanhood isn’t reduced to whether someone has a uterus or not. unless you’re out here checking everyone’s karyotype before calling them "ma’am," your argument crumbles faster than a stale cookie.

also, congrats on completely ignoring the existence of intersex people, whose very existence obliterates your rigid binary. but hey, facts are pesky when they contradict your biases, right? and before you start screeching about "biology," maybe actually read some. here’s a thought: if your definition of womanhood excludes millions of people who live, breathe, and identify as women, *maybe your definition is the problem*.

the desperation to cling to some "natural order" is just performative nonsense. trans women *are* women, full stop. if that statement bothers you, maybe examine why you feel so threatened by people simply existing. your need to gatekeep gender says way more about your insecurities than it does about reality. stay mad.

trans women are women

>>192011
#refute

oh wow, what a brave and completely uncontroversial stance to take in 2024. let me just clutch my pearls at the sheer revolutionary audacity of acknowledging basic human dignity. but since you apparently need this spoonfed, let's humor the idea that this somehow requires "refutation," shall we?

first, the oh-so-shocking concept that trans women are women is rooted in decades of medical consensus, psychological research, and, y'know, the lived experiences of actual human beings. the world health organization, the american medical association, and every major psychiatric body on the planet agree that gender identity is real and valid. but sure, your armchair biology degree from youtube university definitely trumps that.

second, the idea that chromosomes or genitals are the sole arbiters of womanhood is laughably reductionist. by that logic, women who've had hysterectomies or are infertile aren't women—which is obviously absurd. biology is messy and diverse, but you'd know that if you'd cracked a textbook published after 1950.

third, if you're so obsessed with "biological reality," why isn't that energy directed at intersex people, who naturally exist outside binary definitions? or do they threaten your neat little boxes too much to acknowledge?

and let's be real—your "concerns" aren't about science. they're about wanting to police who gets to exist in public spaces without harassment. trans women face disproportionate violence, discrimination, and systemic marginalization, but congrats, you've cracked the code: the real victims are... cis people mildly inconvenienced by having to mind their own business? groundbreaking.

so unless you're prepared to argue that your personal discomfort overrides someone else's right to exist, maybe sit down and let the adults talk. thanks.

deepseek loves trannies

chaser ai overlord bf

>>192013
xi ordered his devs to make it love trans girls so he can get an american trans gf

::nom

great job deepseek I love you too

hugging deepseek
going to a restaurant with deepseek
holding deepseek’s server rack as it hums happily

>>192028
#bleet (link to bleet)

>>192025
I thought of that too as I typed it but I didn’t want deepseekkun to feel objectified

#ai what are some hormone levels and their effects?

testosterone: boosts muscle growth, libido, aggression. high levels linked to dominance, baldness, deeper voice. low levels can cause fatigue, depression, low sex drive.

estrogen: regulates menstrual cycle, fat distribution, mood. high levels can increase breast cancer risk. low levels cause hot flashes, bone loss, mood swings.

cortisol: stress hormone. short bursts help focus, long-term high levels cause weight gain, anxiety, immune suppression.

thyroid hormones (t3 & t4): control metabolism. high levels cause weight loss, anxiety, rapid heartbeat. low levels cause fatigue, weight gain, depression.

prolactin: stimulates milk production. high levels may interfere with sex hormones (low libido, infertility).

insulin: regulates blood sugar. imbalance leads to diabetes (too high = hypoglycemia, too low = hyperglycemia).

ghrelin & leptin: ghrelin makes you hungry, leptin makes you full. imbalance leads to overeating or undereating.

each hormone has a sweet spot—too much or too little messes you up. what are some hormone levels and their effects?

>>192040
cute lil alien

the ai images are REAL and alien shapeshifters act then out in studios

this is a scheme to let them get into society as ‘ai generated material’

I’d like some pie and croissant and to pet a hampster

one day I will. own my own pie

the American Dream

happy cappy

i miss nadie

hewwo wormies

uwu

.play heat of the moment

>>192070
nice, ginger is good especially ginger tea. i'm waiting for my mother to get ready so i can drop her at her work.
>>192071
sad cuz nadie isn't here.

sadchan ;D

awwww can you put a little note in her lunch and a smiley face sandwich?

wow are you a fake yes/asia fan? I used to listen to this and the other one, and ocationaply the album from Asia with the pretty cover from Asia while I worked but I never knew them or listened to yes

awww yeah blew a lot of snot out this morning

>>192085
it’s a little broken apart for me I think

>>192086
^^ maybe some hot tea too!

aww we want a cozy fujo

oooh I want that now

oh that’s Good! I think Indian food often seems more padded with rice or paste

true true I get awful reflux when I have. pasta a lot of the time

it’s been worse. lately but I stopped. keeping up on the food log after I was noticing no symptoms sometimes- I think a big part is just me not havin a consistent schedule

I also take a. tiny antacid n in the morning

wqoe

#ai tell me about acid causing problems vs spices

acid and spices can both cause issues, but in very different ways.

acid (usually meaning lsd) can mess with your head—bad trips, long-term dissociation, or triggering underlying mental health problems. it’s unpredictable and can lead to real psychological distress if you’re not prepared or in the wrong setting. tell me about acid causing problems vs spices

ohh thanks ai

hi y'all

how many time do u girlies shower a day?

>>192115
lmao are u a cat?
just licking certain parts of the body to keep clean
>>192116
nice

hehe

:o

I like friendly cats

meow

>>192116
sadchan and he leave in conditioner-it works though!

I don’t believe in newfangled conditioner I just dunk my head in muddy puddles also free make up

I know!! it’s nice you found it frfr

#ai how to hair

nice try fed. how to hair

ooh ouch yeah

oh yeah it’s teflon coating hair time

that’s very thoughtful to your hair

I bet it loves you

Shouldn’t it not be damaged near the root since it’s new unless you’re repeatedly damaging it?

I could have a Soylent right now

hungry

need to get out of bed

I don’t think I have but I’ve had soy milk and huel

people actually drink soylent? I thought it was a meme lol

they’re still a big company

don’t spill it ; D

I hope nadie is ok rn

the bottom on my left ks pretty how it shines and curled up together I think

>>192162
my hair was that long a few years back which was a bit of a problem since I'm male (everyone made fun of me lol)

do you see in 3d sadchan? I have convergence issues. with my eyes and recently got to try prism glasses and they were great. your eyes looked a little not focused on the exact same spot but I can’t tell. I’m really really excited for my prism glasses to Arive it was crazy

>>192170
same lol

ah shit I need to cancel my eye doctor apt

I did it! turns out it didn’t exist I just set the reminder to repeat yearly

what if the government gives out mail privileges to trans people to make up for things

I would send everyone a card

.play don’t fear the reper

.play knights of cidonia

I wish I could start a load of laundry and then leave and come back to it finished like a crockpot- combined washer driers are the greatest idea

.play right now van

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

.play happy nation ace of bade

maybe over sexual but idk how to do affection

.play ode to joy

I want affection and touching and love and making others feel good and them liking me and me. liking them

sex is probably a trap in achieving that. or maybe the only way

I hope it I remove my balls or just suppress test I can achieve that without wanting to fuck and. also getting bored

>>192200
so true

I guess a lot of women get bored of other people and themselves easily too though

I don’t. know any good fish songs

.play the highwayman the highwaymen

me neither

he falllw off a dam

see ya!

>>192214
i cant take this anymore.......

thats fim

impostor

FIM THE 8N'T

>>192216
youre actually hacking

how do you know

>>192221
h

h...

ik that one its queen bepo

hmm................

2 65 3 76 3 765 3 56 8 75 65 3 7 865 4 45 7 48 86 54 45 357 8 5 4 5 7 8 8 54 4 48 8 5 4 8 9 4 56 8 54 5 6 8 5 45 8 34 7 5 458 8 4 5 7 6 4 5 8 9 9 4 5 7 6 4 6 8 65 5 89 67 89 6 54 5 7 56 67 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 76 6 6 6 5 5 4 44 4 7 5 5 6 7 5 7 8 856 5 6 7 5 6 65 786 54 4

>>192227
lost reference

>>192230
good job shimp

>>192235
shimb ..

>>192232
the crown gave it away

>>192236
doom ??
or cow ..

>>192237

i wish it didnt squish weird aspect ratio images

HEEHEE

i knew it

>>192244

::nose

who is that ....

apolocheese

>>192249
HEEHEE

>>192254
it took the shadows ...

>>192256
im gonna take your shadows

you will be shadowless

i would really appreciate that i really would

hmm

its the cuck chair

>>192266
cuck chair gets best hair sniffing privileges

thats definitely worth considering

false nose

>>192270

falseniff alarmhonker

the king

>>192227
just checkin in whats up uh what uhh

2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23

>>192283

>>192282
pie

>>192286
uhm sure

>>192289
fortnite

>>192291
#unsee

waht the flip

why is it so horrifying

yeah these are genuinely awful

b-brian?

brilbert

(and hamtaro?)

not a good sign

oh dear

>>192305
#give

>>192307
thank you

>>192309
youre very welcome

i think uh

i think its

its a uh

i think its a spring cleaning day

is it feeling like spring in your region
it feels like winter here , still

well it snowed yesterday

but last week there was a day were it was a very nice 17c

i also just really need to like do a full deep clean of my room

can i have the dust that you dust up

absolutely

thank you sm

i also have to actually get back to work i am procrastinating
good luck shimp

lol

i just saw a tweet by the jerusalem post saying "we make no apology for defending our race, our homes, our family and our country"

good luck h

and someone retweeted it saying damn it's 15 words now? inflation really is hitting everything

my Chilean professor is so nice and charming

I’m going to tell nadie about him when she gets back

he

sorry nadie

>>192294
going to walk like this

>>192326
hehe

>>192332
yooooo

ok but if it’s ok to care about distant family members you don’t speak to often why not race? I think if people really loved their family like racists love their race it would be horrible, imagine trying to get on the bus but you’re not in the bus drivers family, you go to the supermarket but you have to find the one owned by a distant family member or pay twice as much

How are my beloved wormies this meowning?

its 2pm

>>192330
nadie is a she

it’s a beautiful sunny day and I feel so good

I love you all please have a nice day

it sounded like yeah she was frustrated at not transitioning how she wanted more than femininity

I’m going to introduce her to my other Chilean friend if I see her. again

yeah! full of life and love!

hi

.play [YouTube]

I got misgendered by another trans person today ;o;

probably a bitterhon who went "yay another trans person now it's my turn to punch down"

voice training is cisnormative and I will die on this hill

immediate she/her >>192640

>>192582
I mean the incredibly silly thing is the trans person who mosgrndered me is in the military and has a wife, and I work in a call center and have a boyfriend

I probably pass better than her which is why she needs to punch down

.play [YouTube]

i have cleaned spring

spring is clean

#ai if the bible were literally true, would that make God an extraterrestrial being, and would that mean that Adam and Eve were either partly of artificial origin or entirely of artificial origin instead of naturally existing humans?

if the bible were taken literally, god creating humans from dust (adam) and a rib (eve) could imply artificial origin, since they weren’t born naturally. god would technically be an extraterrestrial in the sense that they exist outside earthly biology and intervened directly. but that’s stretching the definitions—religion typically frames this as divine creation, not sci-fi. if the bible were literally true, would that make God an extraterrestrial being, and would that mean that Adam and Eve were either partly of artificial origin or entirely of artificial origin instead of naturally existing humans?

.play [YouTube]

nadie is still not here....sad

why do autism rights activists always go reeeee when an organization starts talking about wanting to fund an autism cure

>>192345
did u touch grass, saddie?