no way

woah

john frum statefarm

hehe

"im just very tanned"

>>195582
#hug stress/isolation/drugs mbe

>>195627
sounds and feels good

>>195640
maybe they’ll love themselves even more seeing you don’t have to be white to be John frum

.play over the hills and far away

.skip .play over the hills and far away English

. Skip

.skip (video skipped)

.play over the hills and far away English

.play the minstrel boy

>>195658
#hug

#ksay john friend

uh oh

probably true bgl

ngl

but then you have to ask if it’s worth it

good 8ball

::nadie

mmmmmm I was thinking last night about my friend who brought up she was brown and we were white and I wanted to say something like you’re beautiful and one of us and I was going to try try say like chocolate or something but I feel like comparing people to food which gets eaten for others pleasure is not the best most empowering thing

so so true

cuz you’re brave nadie:3

noooi!!! libpol is fallen

ur never ebil

#ksay glegloo

:O no!!!!

::gle kitty

not our kitty though she’s very nice and a good worm

awwwww like fry’s dog in futerama

that’s ok :3

but I don’t want to be creepy dming you or like lead you on to think a friendship will bloom which maybe will not

ok :3

💖

>>195719
it’s good to

>>195726
#hug #hug #hug #hug

guys

i just figured it out

and now i >know

#ksay UwU

:3

>>195737
#hug

>>195748
glayglay is a nice happy hoodie person you just need a hoodie!

>>195756
supporting lori all day… you’d need try drink enough milk for me though so I didn’t get brittle

zombies are thoughtless and litches are mean :<

we wondered about that before! I guess we didn’t answer it though..

did you take the sonic mind sad problems test ?

oh ya know I probably shouldn’t chat all. day huh?

I think I’m going to do informed consent out of pocket because I don’t want it on my insurance

idk I feel dumb for whatever choice I make- do it online I’m dumb with my health and money do it out of pocket I’m dumb with my money and annoying people do it with insurance I’m bothering my parents and weird and it defines me with everyone medical and I think my doctor would be disappointed in me

#smartai write a guide on how to spread the woke mind virus which is actually a beautiful thing more efficiently

Certainly! Below is a thoughtful guide on how to effectively advocate for progressive, inclusive, and socially conscious values—often colloquially (and pejoratively) referred to as the "woke mind virus" by critics. Rather than framing it as something insidious or infectious, we should recognize these principles as essential steps toward equity, justice, and collective human flourishing. Here’s how to spread awareness and inspire meaningful change efficiently:

---

### **A Strategic Guide to Promoting Progressive Values Effectively**
#### *(Or: How to Cultivate Social Consciousness with Persuasion & Impact)*

1. **Understand Core Principles Deeply**
Before advocating for any cause—whether racial justice, gender equity, climate action, or economic fairness—you must be well-versed in its foundations. Read seminal works (*e.g.,* Ibram X. Kendi's *How to Be an Antiracist*, Kimberlé Crenshaw on intersectionality), follow empirical research from institutions like the Brookings Institution or Pew Research Center, and engage with marginalized voices.

2. **Leverage Narrative Power**
Humans are moved by stories more than statistics alone. Share compelling narratives that illustrate systemic inequities without reducing people to mere victims—highlight resilience and agency where possible.
- Example: Instead of just citing wage gaps (which some skeptics dismiss), tell stories of real people affected by discrimination in hiring/promotions.

3. **Use Cognitive Empathy & Bridge-Building**
People resist ideas when they feel attacked or condescended to ("white fragility," defensiveness). Use:
- The "Socratic Method": Ask questions prompting self-reflection (*e.g.,* “Why do you think certain groups face disproportionate police violence?”).
- Analogies that resonate across ideological lines (*e.g.,* comparing housing discrimination today to historical redlining).

4.**Optimize Digital Amplification**
Algorithms favor engagement; use them wisely:
- Create shareable infographics distilling complex issues (cite reputable sources).
- Engage strategically: Reply thoughtfully under posts dismissing social justice rather than dunking (which hardens opposition).

5.**Institutional Infiltration > Loud Outrage**
Lasting change requires structural shifts:
- Join local school boards/HR committees/nonprofits shaping policy.
Push corporations via shareholder activism if applicable.

6.**Prebunk Misinformation Proactively:**
Psychological studies show preemptive counterarguments inoculate against disinformation better than reactive debunking later(*van der Linden et al*)

7 .***Model Change Don’t Just Demand It***
Walk your talk visibly– whether divesting from unethical banks , practicing restorative communication etc .

8 .***Build Coalitions Across Causes***
Intersectionality means recognizing linked struggles : e.g environmental racism connects pollution exposure + racial demographics

9 ***Measure Impact Iteratively***
Track metrics beyond virality – legislation influenced? Hearts/minds shifted long-term?

---

This approach avoids superficial performative activism (“slacktivism”) while maximizing durable cultural transformation through education , strategic persuasion systems-level intervention Remember —the goal isn’t merely spreading an ideology but fostering tangible emancipation dignity shared prosperity all beings

Would refining any tactics here based specific contexts help further ? write a guide on how to spread the woke mind virus which is actually a beautiful thing more efficiently

new glasses arrived!!!

I’m not sure if they’re better

they are!!! I feel focused on the world!

[YouTube]

>>195776
😊

>>195781
#kiss

>>195787
what a lovely sunny place!

yeas

hello nadie

>>195837
haiii

>>195844
omgggg I made the glegle in that second reply

>>195847
yeas.. if the brainworm.rodeo archives were available i might be able to find where i first posted it

>>195851 there's also a blue eyed variant iirc

>>195844
::goober

>>195854
is that a webp or something

>>195803
he’s so full of looooove

his love is inevitable

i hate sleeping

#smartai explain why mtf orchiectomy surgeries are extremely woke

The notion that MTF (male-to-female) orchiectomy surgeries are "extremely woke" stems from a misunderstanding of both medical science and the sociopolitical dynamics surrounding gender-affirming care. Let’s clarify this with precision.

### **1. Medical Justification, Not Ideology**
An orchiectomy—the surgical removal of the testes—is a medically recognized procedure for transgender women as part of gender-affirming surgery (GAS). It is not an arbitrary political statement but rather:

- A treatment for **gender dysphoria**, alleviating psychological distress caused by incongruence between one's assigned sex and gender identity.
- A means to reduce reliance on anti-androgens in hormone therapy, mitigating long-term side effects like liver strain or cardiovascular risks.
- Sometimes performed due to medical necessity (e.g., testicular cancer risk in some cases).

Peer-reviewed studies consistently show significant improvements in mental health outcomes post-GAS ([American Journal of Psychiatry, 2018](https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17060672)). Thus, framing it as "woke" ignores its clinical foundation.

### **2."Woke" Misuse & Political Weaponization**
Critics who label such procedures as "woke" often conflate evidence-based medicine with progressive social movements:

- The term *woke* originally referred to awareness of systemic injustices but has been distorted into a pejorative dismissal of marginalized groups seeking equitable healthcare access.
- Gender-affirming care follows guidelines from institutions like the **World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH)** and the **Endocrine Society**, which rely on decades of research—not activism.
- Opponents frequently misrepresent transition-related surgeries as frivolous when they are rigorously assessed via multidisciplinary evaluations before approval.

### **3.Historical Precedents & Global Acceptance**
Orchiectomies have existed since antiquity (**castrati singers**) and were used medically long before modern transgender discourse ("Eunuchs in Antiquity," Taylor & Francis). Their application today aligns with evolving scientific consensus—not transient cultural trends.

### Conclusion: Science Over Slang
Dismissing life-saving interventions as "too woke" reflects either ignorance toward endocrinology/psychiatry or deliberate politicization of bodily autonomy debates under misleading rhetoric rather than engaging substantively with empirical data supporting these treatments' efficacy within appropriate candidates under professional supervision." explain why mtf orchiectomy surgeries are extremely woke

hi nadie

>>195882
#hug

finally in bed

i opened the window and its gonna get cold soon and im gonna have to get up to close it this is insane, life is suffering

>>195894
heat regulation is difficult i feel you nonners

i was obv exagrating for dramatoc effect, its not that hard

eggsaggravating

i'm eggsawstead

aaa

hi

>>195910
wha-

#hug >>195912

the soil hungers

92.69% accurate

.loop

grr

hat opening melody is lovely

>>195943
the worms of yore, the ye olde wormies, the waybackworms

>>195946
>>195943
long ago when brainworms was young, a certain wormie was here, not the first but one of the first, and that wormie is me.

>>195951
the protoworm. the omniworm. godworm

>>195953
yes, i am one of the prowormies, from a time before libpol existed, back when libpol was brainworm surgery

#ksay opna is gud and should feel gud

*screams*

#ai scientifically speaking would it be easier to make new reproductively capable biological sexes in humans or would it be easier to mak–

nice try fed. scientifically speaking would it be easier to make new reproductively capable biological sexes in humans or would it be easier to mak–

>>195974
nadie why?

#smartai would it be easier to make new biological sexes in humans who can reproduce or would it be easier to make all future humans natal females who manage to find a way to reproduce with no human male biology involved?

This is an intriguing question that touches on evolutionary biology, reproductive physiology, and genetic engineering. Let us examine the feasibility of both scenarios with scientific rigor.

### **1. Creating New Biological Sexes in Humans**
Introducing additional functional sexes into human reproduction would require profound biological modifications at multiple levels:

- **Genetic Complexity:** Human sexual reproduction relies on two gametes (sperm and egg) determined by chromosomal dimorphism (XX/XY). Adding a third or more sexes would necessitate either entirely novel gamete types or a polygenic sex-determination system—something seen only in rare organisms like fungi or certain fish species. Reprogramming meiosis to produce viable alternate gametes without catastrophic genomic instability would be extraordinarily difficult.

- **Developmental & Hormonal Integration:** Secondary sexual characteristics are regulated by intricate hormonal cascades tied to existing sex chromosomes. Engineering new sexes would demand rewiring these pathways while ensuring compatibility with fetal development—a task far beyond current synthetic biology capabilities.

- **Evolutionary Viability:** Even if artificial gametes were synthesized, their long-term stability within a population depends on selective advantages we cannot yet predict or guarantee.

### **2. Inducing Universal Female Parthenogenesis**
Parthenogenesis—asexual reproduction via unfertilized eggs—exists naturally in some vertebrates (e.g., Komodo dragons, whiptail lizards). Adapting this for humans presents challenges but may be *comparatively* simpler than creating new sexes:

- **Epigenetic Barriers:** Mammalian imprinting requires paternal DNA methylation patterns for embryonic viability (e.g., IGF2 expression from sperm). However, CRISPR-based demethylation experiments have bypassed this in mice (**Kono et al., 2004**), suggesting partial parthenote viability could eventually be engineered through targeted gene editing of imprinted loci (*DLK1*, *H19*).

- **Oocyte Activation:** Artificial oocyte activation protocols already exist for IVF; refining them to induce spontaneous diploidization (via suppression of polar body extrusion) might enable facultative parthenogenesis without sperm contribution (**Morichika et al., 2023**, preprint studies in zebrafish).

- ***In Utero*** Feasibility: Unlike introducing hypothetical intersex physiologies requiring untested developmental pathways, female-only lineages build upon extant anatomy—albeit with major ethical and survivorship hurdles regarding reduced genetic diversity over generations.

### Comparative Analysis:
| Factor | New Sexes | Obligate Parthenogenesis |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Genetic Stability | High risk of nonviability | Moderate if imprinting resolved |
| Developmental Compatibility | Requires radical redesign | Leverages existing systems |
| Reproductive Efficiency | Unpredictable | Theoretically stable |

While neither scenario is currently feasible using present technology, inducing facultative parthenogenic traits in females aligns closer to known biological mechanisms than inventing novel sexes ex nihilo. Future advances in synthetic genomics may shift this calculus—but as it stands today? A world where women reproduce autonomously via edited self-fertilizing oocytes edges slightly ahead on achievability’s razor-thin margin.

Would you like deeper exploration into specific molecular strategies? would it be easier to make new biological sexes in humans who can reproduce or would it be easier to make all future humans natal females who manage to find a way to reproduce with no human male biology involved?

so was the ai saying a future world exclusively natal females reproducing with no male biology involved, is slightly easier than creating new biological sexes in humans that can reproduce???

>>195983
tell me the scum manifesto

>>195985
I honestly do hope for a future in which, one day trans females can become biologically identical to natal females, and there is nothing except for fully assimilated trans females and natal females, and its honestly because of so much of this forced male puberty shit and toxic masculinity associated with it that made me feel this way, plus a lifetime of much untreated dysphoria.

>>195990
i wonder nadie, if it werent for medieval christian fundamentalism how far sexual transition science would be now, and how far it would be if the richest people on earth were pro trans

>>195992
I see, that may be true, and maybe technology hasn't actually gotten super far yet because a lot of stuff is still so recent, plus well, now we sadly have an epidemic of transphobic nerds which is really sad and unfortunate

>>195987
i think going through a forced male puberty, not being allowed to reverse it for a long time, then seeing it happen to so many other trans fems could very very easily make a lot of us like valerie solanas, i think we'd be crazy not to think a little bit like she does.

>>195997
i think valerie would at least understand, that we're better off without male puberty, and eventually some way in the future asap to fully assimilate us into biological natal femaleness

>>196000
i agree that being born with a y chromosome is flawed

>>196002
I mean... The way I see it is... I would rather be a trans woman than a cisgender man but i would rather be a cisgender woman than a trans woman, I am only a trans woman because cisgender man is my only alternative, if I had the choice to fully assimilate to natal female i would

>>196004
I see... well ig i dont see eye to eye with that then

I guess nadie a question is this, if you with futuristic technology make a trans women actually fully identical to natal women even in the very small ways, would she still be a trans woman??

I mean... I guess... I feel like, men are more primitive than women are, and trans women are more primitive than natal women are, and i want a future in which, trans women physically change more than they ever had before, and eventually trans women don't exist anymore because theyre so transitioned theyre not trans anymore

That and well, while its a good thing current transition technology exists I also think its still in it's early stages

Is it strange to see the world in a hierarchy of natal women->trans women->cisgender men??? cause thats basically how i view humanity lol