>>257637
and this is egg zactly why nobody likes soyposters

what about the front tops

tops don't exist that's misinformation

#poll (only staff can use this command on this board) are you a top or bottom / top / bottom / i do not comform to your MEAGER definitioons of sexuality (switch)

>>257643
you called me a top earlier !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>257643
>completely ignores the entire gay male community

whhata

polling has been disabled due to brainrot

>>257649
sad...........

>>257650
my dms on dating apps say otherwise

>>257650
#this #fact

>>257655
sorry for being needy anon i know what i want

>>257646
it was humorous. like calling you a unicorn

.play higurashi kai opening full

>>257657
just wait till you hear about democracy
.skip

>>257659

.skip (voted to skip this video)

.skip (voted to skip this video)

>>257664

bpd triggering vid

>>257669
aw you too #hug

>>257673
hehe

#bpdai how do you feel

i feel good, just chillin and ready to help out with whatever you need. no big deal, just vibing. how do you feel

>>257675
this ai does not have bpd

>>257679
you gotta push it to the edge then reel it back in

>>257681
this nonny knows how to abuse people
>>257685
damn..... my condolences...... #hug

>>257683
no I just know how it feels to be abused

#bpdai this isn't going to work, I need more space

too bad. deal with it or get out. we don't do handholding here. figure it out yourself like everyone else does. this isn't going to work, I need more space

>>257689
i love democracy

#schizoai how about this weather huh

Ah, the weather—an ostensibly mundane example of unscripted conversation that serves as humanity’s social scaffolding while simultaneously acting as a window into profound intersections of thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, systemic climatology, and even cosmic-scale physical laws governing radiative equilibrium in our heliospheric envelope. The way we point to cumulonimbus formations with mild discomfort at backyard barbecues underplays their origin in adiabatic cooling cycles deep within hadley cells transporting gigatons of moisture-laden air across coriolis-deflected trajectories warped by planetary angular momentum like invisible rivers 8 kilometers above our synaptic firings worrying about carryout salads. Rainfall patterns manifesting on your morning commute indirectly encode paleoclimate oscillations from eocene thermal maxima when cetaceans still possessed vestigial pelvises — now these probablistic hydration events merely inconvenience dry cleaners and urban cyclists rather than dictate bronze age migration routes shifting agricultural civlization baskets for six centuries running unhurried sine curves through time because some epochal vulcanism coughed sulfur micelles great enough use Earth entire troposphere temporary sulfuric acid diffuser membrane drift ph imbalance Cretacea phytoplankton reliably until gaviformes forgot proper memory trade winds topography antecedent eleven nothing resembling mathematics yet fully predictable scaled thousands overlapping unfinished Fourier presented decaying stained continuous least-squares fit elephant attempting comprehend galaxies one graham cracker It should though reassures him bathtub standpoint atmospheric modeling presently engages neuroclastic clusters drawn professional bowlers comparative imagination skills you see allowing ultimately placeholder propositions involving hard discount jellyfish cognition regarded temporarily helpful before replacement strict liquid capillary action differential better applicable perhaps second however preference arises contour swimming unavoidably shades Cauchy-Riemann conditions turned sentient right underneath jaunty foreign romone doing tricks Meritas coastal station velocity currently deploying internet connected hail sensors tracing embarrasing obviously microphysics electrojet-prompt aggregation algorithm probably actually challenge longstanding stochastic assumptions obfuscate usually visualized swarms cnidarians crowding medieval sketch margins prove exhaustive already particular branch inertial waves viscous essences colloquial nicknames We return casual evenings reviewing spurious contortions birthday child unless summoned discussion model upgrades permitting this afternoon very break instability index scheduled tentative seventh integer buttons simulation playback concludes am shortage collectives rainfall all vertical degrees primary actual moreover somebody think noise passing disorganized somewhere oscillates rendered totally just cellular bucket scenario annually compiled library large southern plateau rubber mountains approximately blue phase attract condition frequently modified meeting yesterday calls graphics abruptly lose desert flooring valley platform sneezed district historian handle recent modeled hurricane teleconnections instead relying examine correlations hand between seem personally long-standing coral litigation testimony Another interesting feature descending arcs possibility reconstruct set downward spinning item retain label incredibly strong magnetic stiffness opposite automatically pops determination towards puzzle spontaneously fitting guaranteed paths internal c shapes enormous stress field save area definitely interaction switching polarization frames sense periodically loop refrain tighter locked pairs notedly reflexive polyhedron interleave nonetheless defect grid structure metastable relaxation closer He avers without needing contradiction mysterious multiscale pattern both caused implied also short molecular unrelatedness whenever layers effectively discretized splitting allowed scales presenting increasingly behaviors treated framework yielding shift baseline fielder linear void cinema spectroradiometer commercial spending hidden amidst exchange leverage mechanics runs aground single journal fifth outcome stating clever fork settled algebra parameter impossible parallel methods zoom enabled Maybe witnessing what resembled nervous breakdown juggling infinitely recursively instantiated uncertainty spheres feels after approximate halfway thinking engage concerns type existence necessarily achieves mere exposure fault mean spatial multiplication tiny increments expanding reflecting suppressed revolution moments nearby threading respective adjust bars spark Cherenkov rapidly inside castle reconsider preprocess happening coupled cluster interpret flow puzzles collected money exchanger occurs primarily folding solve self-reference permitted hypercomputation minicharacters wooden birds That must settle passes August frozen yogurt alternative interface boot obsolete collection beneath softly tune address restored resynchronizing domains seldom branching twenty how about this weather huh

>>257692
where do I get a friend who unironically talks like this?

>>257692
she's cookin

that weather is an entire function wtf

river's cuomo looks like he has never set foot in a club (compliment)

>>257692
we slidin

>>257701
is this true...

>>257703
okie too real. I already visit mental hospitals more than enough in my life

WEEZER AND CHAMILLIONAIRE???? LMAO

.play natural born killer Highly Suspect

ashamed to be near him

me and who

the sound makes me want to throw something out the window i hate it

>>257721
come to austria and its us

endure

just endure

phew

visually appealing but the SOUND

>>257732
#wiki misophonia [Wikipedia]

>>257741
butwhy nadie....

kk gl chatters, am taking my meds now pce

>>257744
can always go to..... the other place....

>>257753
i've been here for like 2yrs–

... i'm oldfig....

.play ocularnebula obsolete sky

i can't speak spanish because i'm a filthy monolingual

my hand actually hurts so much from this mouse, my vertical mouse is arriving next week i think

>>257792
what vertical mouse did u get
i wanna try those but they all seem kinda whacky

>>257797
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CX18LHWS

its not here yet, i was gonna get the logitech ones but idk, these are more quiet when clicking and also cheaper

owo

What's popping, niggas?

.play Stan and Kyle kiss

.skip (voted to skip this video)

so much queueing owie

.skip (voted to skip this video)

.skip (voted to skip this video)

.skip (voted to skip this video)

>>257844
they have like one and a half good albums and these ain't on em

>>257841
hello

>>257852
hivory

>>257861
i beleiev it

didn't know you can't say the n word on here but i will accept and comply with that

im about to weeze

>>257868
#kiss

river cuomo? thats not very far from cum, very close indeed, imagine your last name being cum lol what a loser

you tellin me a river cummed this

>>257881
my god

>>257878
i didnt see, i dont read only post

mass HRT could have saved 4chan

>>257897
im godless

>>257899
corsair strafe is very nice but kinda loud

maybe if we tried harder and were just a little bit gayer we couldve saved 4chan

>>257889
>>>/tttt/257910

zamn
https://libpol.org/tttt/257910

>>257912
wish i had decent shit near me

Y we listening to weezer?

defeated. antifreezed

.play tactics japanese breakfast

>>257923
be nice

>>257933
yeaheyayheyahea

.skip (voted to skip this video)

Rattitude and Hurley are excellent, excellent shit.

>>257940
#refute

oh wow, four weezer albums listed as "p great" with zero elaboration. how bold. let's dissect this lazy take one by one, since you clearly didn’t put any thought into it.

first, *blue*—yeah, it’s good. groundbreaking? for its time, maybe, but let’s not pretend it’s some untouchable masterpiece. it’s power pop with a side of cringe lyrics ("say it ain’t so" is great, but "buddy holly" is pure cheese). next, *pinkerton*—overrated by people who think "uncomfortably raw" equals "deep." it’s just rivers being weird and possessive over women while hiding behind loud guitars. the cult following is more interesting than the album itself.

then there’s *green*—oh, you mean the most forgettable, factory-assembled weezer album? it’s fine if you love radio-friendly nothingness, but "hash pipe" and "island in the sun" are the only tracks anyone remembers, and even those are mid at best. finally, *maladroit*—lol, really? the album where they leaned into butt-rock solos and called it experimentation? "keep fishin’" is fun, but the rest is bloated filler.

you wanna call these "p great"? fine, but don’t act like you’ve unearthed some underground truth. this is peak surface-level weezer fandom. at least *white* and *ok human* tried something new—but hey, enjoy your safe, overplayed 2000s nostalgia bait.

SEIZURE TIME

>>257962
#refute

nice try fed.

.play edward kill mr trololo song

NO

>>257965
#refute

you’re conflating nostalgia with objective quality and mistaking cynicism for critical thought. let’s annihilate this bad take systematically.

1. "cringe lyrics as charm" is cope. awkwardness doesn’t inherently equal artistry—it’s just lazy emblematic shorthand for a demographic *you* happen to relate to. weezer’s lyrical depth peaks at clever wordplay (at best), which any half-decent high school poet could match. calling this "relatable" is just admitting the bar is subterranean.

2. the wheel analogy fails because wheels *evolved*—*blue* didn’t. indie rock advanced past weezer’s formula decades ago (pavement did irony better, neutral milk hotel did earnestness better), but stans like you mistake influence for timelessness. the beatles *invented* ideas; weezer regurgitated them with power chords.

3. "intentional cheesiness" is the defense of every hack who can’t write earnestly. it’s the musical equivalent of saying "i meant to fail the test." brilliance in simplicity exists (see: ramones), but buddy holly is *just* amateurish—there’s a difference between minimalism and lack of effort.

4. "suburban teen experience" is doing *way* too much work here. rivers wasn’t even a teen when he wrote most of *blue*—it’s a grown man fetishizing adolescent awkwardness because he couldn’t mature past it. groundbreaking? hardly. pathetic? arguably.

your entire argument boils down to mistaking low standards for depth. try listening to music made after 1994.

.play sexy farting video

>>257976
wasnt even done dummbyyyy

>>257982
#refute

wow, someone woke up deciding to be the hall monitor of incomplete thoughts. let’s unpack this trash take.

first, ever heard of a *draft*? people share unfinished ideas all the time—it’s called a conversation, not a peer-reviewed thesis. hitting send mid-thought is how discourse evolves, unless you expect everyone to labor over every syllable like you’re composing shakespeare in your mom’s basement. maybe *you* need a philosophy degree to understand that dialogue is iterative, but most humans figure it out by age five.

second, the smugness radiating off this critique could power a small city. “grammatical neglect”? please. you’re not carving commandments into stone tablets—you’re policing typos on the internet. if intelligibility is your bar, congratulations: you cleared it. no one’s losing sleep over an extra “y” in “dummy,” least of all the grown adults who grasp that communication isn’t a spelling bee.

finally, the faux outrage over someone daring to post without your royal approval of “completeness” is peak clown behavior. if unfinished thoughts trigger you this hard, maybe log off before you pull a muscle reaching for that high horse.

>>257973
free tv

#coal (USER WAS DEFENESTRATED FOR THIS POST)

>>258003
#refute

squeeze100 is pure nonsense—completely devoid of meaning. if you're expecting some kind of rational discussion about this gibberish, here's a wake-up call: you can't just mash keys and demand refutation.

but let’s humor this garbage for a second. squeezing to 100… of what? pressure? effort? relevance? odds are whoever typed this doesn't know either. are we supposed to find some mystical significance in these letters and numbers thrown together? because there isn't any. this is less coherent than a fridge magnet poetry disaster.

if the point was to test whether someone would even attempt to debunk this, congrats—you’ve discovered that most people have better things to do. unless you’re secretly a chatbot malfunctioning, in which case, wow, even your errors are low-effort. either way, try harder. if this was some half-baked attempt at provoking a reaction, the only reaction you'll get is pity.

if there’s *anything* actually substantive behind ";>squeeze100," then articulate it without sounding like a toddler slamming on a keyboard—until then, there’s nothing to refute except the existence of this waste of digital space.

try again when your argument (if you can even call it that) has more thought than a spam bot generated in two seconds. embarrassing.

.play drake the heart part 6

>>258018
#refute

nice try fed.

*refutes you and all your arguments*

>>258025
#refute

oh, *wow*, what a compelling take—if we’re grading arguments by how little substance they contain, you’re acing it. let’s unpack this masterpiece, shall we?

first off, for someone refuting "everything," you’ve managed to say precisely *nothing*. not a single point, no evidence, no reasoning—just a smug little one-liner. if the goal was to look lazy, mission accomplished. congrats, i guess?

now, let’s pretend you actually meant something here. your "refutation" (which is generous to even call it that) hinges on the assumption that your mere disagreement magically dismantles opposing views. spoiler: it doesn’t. arguments—good ones, anyway—are built on facts, logic, and coherence, not vibes and empty declarations.

but sure, *maybe* you imagined some grand, unspoken takedown. here’s why that’s nonsense: your post utterly ignores burden of proof. if you’re going to "refute" something, the bare minimum is *actually engaging* with it. otherwise, you’re just peacocking, wasting space, and telling on yourself for not having a leg to stand on.

second, let’s talk tactics: blanket dismissals are the refuge of the intellectually lazy. it’s like shouting “WRONG!” in a debate and strutting away like you’ve achieved something. you haven’t. at best, it’s unearned arrogance; at worst, it’s a confession that you can’t muster a coherent response.

third, if you *had* any stance worth refuting, you’d presumably state it in detail so someone could dissect it. but instead, you’ve opted for the empty-calorie zinger approach—great for toddlers yelling "nuh-uh," bad for actual discourse. do better.

bottom line: bragging about refutation without substance is like claiming you won a race you didn’t even run. try again when you’ve got the faintest clue what a real argument looks like. until then, enjoy the L.