.play chicken jockey

OMG TETO LITERALLY ME

that is SPIKEDOG not bury....

for shame, booru

.play aerodynamic

>>334548
nono i understand nadie it's not your fault
it's the system that has wronged us

my second time ever listening to her

good luck babe is better

.skip (voted to skip this video)

.play [YouTube]

.play [YouTube]

yeah >>334579

>>334580
is that supposed to be an insult...

>>334587
we need to remove this chemical from our schools

chicken jockey or something i guess

.play [YouTube]

vaxxed?

why is everyone glegling?

.skip (voted to skip this video)

shit once i have put on a mime cosplay and i was super hot

#smartai how come trans women who acted toxically masculine as children and got in physical fights as children, get judged so negatively for it, if they never engaged in these behaviours as an adult?

The negative judgment directed toward trans women who exhibited toxically masculine behaviors in childhood—such as physical aggression or hypercompetitive dominance—but later disengaged from those patterns in adulthood is rooted in a complex interplay of societal biases, cognitive dissonance, and rigid gender essentialism. Several key factors contribute to this phenomenon:

1. **Retroactive Gender Essentialism**: Society often imposes binary expectations on behavior based on assigned sex at birth. When individuals deviate from these norms (e.g., a trans woman rejecting masculinity), observers retrospectively scrutinize their past through an unforgiving lens that conflates *behavior* with *identity*. Childhood aggression is pathologized differently for cis boys versus trans girls: the former may be dismissed as "boys being boys," while the latter becomes "proof" of insincerity about femininity.

2. **Confirmation Bias & Transmisogyny**: Trans women face disproportionate scrutiny regarding their authenticity, with detractors weaponizing any past adherence to patriarchal masculinity as evidence that they are "really men." This ignores the reality that many trans people perform exaggerated gendered behaviors pre-transition as a survival strategy (e.g., overcompensating via fighting to avoid suspicion of femininity). Toxic masculinity isn’t inherent; it’s often armor against dysphoria or social rejection.

3. **Failure of Redemption Narratives**: Cis men who outgrow violent tendencies are frequently granted redemption arcs ("he changed"), but transfeminine people are denied this grace due to transmisogynistic tropes positioning them as deceptive or predatory. Their past actions become immutable stains rather than phases contextualized by repression and self-discovery.

4. **Double Standards in Emotional Labor**: Feminine-coded individuals are expected to embody perpetual passivity/nurturance; thus, historical aggression reads as irreconcilable with womanhood itself—whereas cis women displaying similar histories (e.g., “tomboy” phases) aren’t subjected to equivalent interrogation because their gender isn’t contingent upon performance.

5. **Developmental Nuance Erasure**
Human behavior evolves across lifespan stages under psychosocial pressures—yet critics freeze-frame select moments from a trans person's youth while ignoring adult growth/atonement efforts made post-transition when healthier coping mechanisms emerge alongside authentic self-expression opportunities unavailable earlier due either internalized shame external oppression systems like bullying familial rejection etcetera which can foster defensive hostility during formative years

In essence: The condemnation reflects less objective assessment than entrenched cultural anxieties around gender nonconformity whereby transgressing both natal sex roles AND acquired ones invites uniquely punitive scrutiny compared even other marginalized groups whose members also navigate complicated paths toward self-actualization amidst hostile environments how come trans women who acted toxically masculine as children and got in physical fights as children, get judged so negatively for it, if they never engaged in these behaviours as an adult?

.skip (voted to skip this video)

im not a chaser but i think we should be nicer to them its not like they are bad people honestly they seem pretty sweet most of the time and also really funny i would love to date a chaser personally

>>334663
if someone hasd a ver yvery very small amount of facial hair but its super visible is that manmoder or boymoder?

man 40 and 58 of shit, please kill me

peak...

>>334714
how please tell me

>>334721
no i mean how to you approched her, dm?

>>333612
TBH I think a good idea is make facial feminization surgery universal and take less than a year for a wait, and during the waiting period you are told to tough it out and take it like a man, then mere days after facial feminization suddenly being extremely nice to the post op trans girl

>>334728
>>334729
>>334731
bitch lucky

>>334730
lol good way to put it

can love bloom on the battlefield

>>334709
I have only around a thousand facial hair follicles but they are insanely visible esp around the goatee area,like I do not have 30k to 50k beard hairs like a lot of men do, mine are only like 1k left, and I have had laser

>>334738
its just not fair, i live in a desert place with no one close enough

>>334749
>>334750
tbh i am at the point where laser stopped giving results I had lots of laser work done on my face, I went from probs around 45k beard follicles to 1k, its so much thinner than it once was but the goatee region is still super visible under bright light

>>334751
how do people get online relationship, i only even got in person ones

>>334753
it got rid of 99% of my cheek and neck hairs, my goatee region on the other hand, around I would say 10% of it survived

>>334765
is this a diss or and actual thing

if the boymoder dates the manmoder, who tops?

>>334768
>>334767
i used to have a thick neck beard it was awful uncomfortable felt freakish and disgusting didnt know it was physically possible til it happened to me, its gone now, I literally only have like three hairs on my neck when I used to have several thousand

>>334774
do you have advice for me

i'm learning so much

>>334768
yeah it's under my chin and upper lip, i kinda have a sparse hitler stache its pretty bad its just the hairs that survived

.skip (voted to skip this video)

>>334782
and about the distance?

.play joy street

>>334791
its working out or are you lying?

TBH I havent done any electrolysis on my goatee area that survived a ton of laser treatments cause I am undergoing leg laser right now, about to have my fourth treatment

>>334797
sorry for asking personal questions but what is your meeting rate?

#smartai why did laser hair removal remove like 99% of my cheek and neck hairs but my goatee region though thinned out a lot has survived the process a lot more?

The differential response of your facial hair to laser hair removal—with near-complete clearance on the cheeks and neck but persistent growth in the goatee region—can be attributed to several well-documented biological and technical factors. Here’s a breakdown of the key reasons:

### 1. **Hair Follicle Density & Androgen Sensitivity**
- The goatee area (chin, mustache, and soul patch) is part of the *androgen-dependent* beard zone, meaning these follicles are highly responsive to testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT). These hormones prolong the anagen (growth) phase, making hairs more resilient.
- Cheek and neck hairs often have lower androgen sensitivity, so they respond better to laser targeting.

### 2. **Anagen Phase Variability**
- Laser efficacy depends on catching hairs in their *anagen phase*, when melanin-rich bulbs actively grow. Beard hairs cycle asynchronously: while cheek/neck follicles may sync temporarily during treatment sessions, goatee-area follicles often stagger cycles due to hormonal signaling.

### 3. **Melanin Concentration & Hair Diameter**
- Coarse terminal hairs (common in male beards) contain more melanin superficially but may have deeper roots that lasers struggle to fully disable at standard settings due to dermal scattering or insufficient depth penetration.
- Thinner cheek/neck hairs absorb laser energy more uniformly because their smaller diameter allows complete follicular destruction without requiring excessive power.

### 4. **Suboptimal Wavelength Selection or Fluence**
- Many clinics use Alexandrite (755 nm) or Diode (810 nm) lasers for fair skin tones; however, deeper-penetrating Nd:YAG (1064 nm)—better suited for coarse dark hair—may not always be prioritized unless requested.
- If fluence was overly conservative here due to pain tolerance concerns around sensitive lip areas (*mental nerve distribution*), residual follicle survival would occur.

### 5. **Follicular Stem Cell Reservoirs**
Recent studies suggest certain "bulge" stem cells within beard follicles regenerate even after initial damage via Wnt/β-catenin pathways—particularly under continued androgen stimulation explaining partial regrowth despite apparent thinning post-treatment.

#### Practical Recommendations:
- Consider maintenance sessions with higher-fluence Nd:YAG if further reduction is desired.
- Combine electrolysis for remaining resistant stragglers since it destroys individual follicles indiscriminately regardless of cycle stage/hormonal influence.
- Hormonal modulation isn't advisable unless medically indicated given systemic side effects outweighing cosmetic benefits here!

This outcome reflects intrinsic physiological constraints rather than procedural failure per se — essentially confirming why full permanent removal remains elusive even with advanced tech working against evolved secondary sexual characteristic robustness! why did laser hair removal remove like 99% of my cheek and neck hairs but my goatee region though thinned out a lot has survived the process a lot more?

we can in 41 minutes

>>334808
dont you feel lonely?

>>334813
thank you, you are so sweet

hongry :(

ugh i wish chicken love put their music on youtube i cant find it anywhere

>>334820
bitch stop

>>334828
its bad for your ass

>>334833
bitch please, its pudding

>>334845
my BMI is 21 how much is yours

anyone else feel like, on occasion their years ago lasered facial hair returns at random moments for like a week then falls out of the root again? Is this even physically possible or is this my dysphoric brain making me insane?

>>334846
I only talked to one lady on lex that i long term got along with there was interest in, wont say details but basically her ex wanted her back so that was that

.skip (voted to skip this video)

.skip (voted to skip this video)

>>334859
ok you good but the pudding is killing you

>>334870
ty

#tag (post has no image) us

>>334868
suicide by lazy gamer girl lifestyle

>>334858
>hon
it feels like some of my facial hair comes back temporarily during times of elevated prolonged stress even tho i had an orchiectomy

i cook and clean and when i was a guy a was good at it, now what am i just another housewife bitch

I have heard that prolonged extreme stress can cause a tiny bit of facial hair to develop in natal women its nothing like male puberty but like, allegedly some of them can get a tiny handful of whiskers from prolonged extreme stress or so i read recently

it took me many years of doing that but yeah it causes kidney stones.

drinking fruit juice or eating fruit or consuming vinegar will break down some kinds of kidney stones in your body over time but this is a longterm thing.

>>334895
do i take it like a good thing or no

If super thick facial hair is manmoding, and no visible facial hair at all is boymoding, does that mean extremely visible but extremely thin facial hair is twinkhon moding?

>>334901
recently i started imagining the you know shit "dinner bath or me" with me being the wife and i got hard rock sorry