i've re-realized that i don't know how to interact with others

wtf

this got a lot more extreme than i thought

ummm

im in bed

which is the real one

The toaster is very brave

are they gay for each other

holy f*ck

Are you sure?

Can you provide a transcript?

>>423241
lol i saw that thread

Like I feel that women grind harder then men because they need to work harder because there is higher expectations on women then on men because of misogyny

deus ex machina be like.

>>423260
did it make you realize you were transgender

when did you first realize

i feel i had an inordinate exposure to lgbt+ stuff as a youth when i was like 12 to 14 i remember getting a magazine issue about transgender youths as well as seeing multiple reality tv shows about it and i remember some of my middle school classmates being lesbians and i think one of them said they were genderfluid i didn't understand most of it and i remember that made me a bit annoyed because i didn't really use the internet because i was not allowed to by my parents >>423266

thank you for reading my blog

🛶🛶🛶🛶🛶🛶🛶🛶🛶

>>423271
#edit make this a random single latin letter

>>423271
#fix make this a random swedish letter

>>423271
#schizotransvert

>>423271
#redact

very interesting

this and the last song kinda slap

I still refuse to do anything

>>423292
st-stop

the movie was ok. it didn't really leave much of a lasting impression on me. can you imagine that, an animated kid's film doing that?? unheardable

>>423303
twink/afab yuri

*twinkhon

>>423302
it would've been better if the lamp had died a noble death

and the radio losing his tubes

missed opportunities for character development

>>423329
yes

oh my god

yes

>>423326
oh my god

fuck the world

the world is ending

I'm done pretending

>unplug an ssd with only music on it
>computer wont boot anymore

linus ubuntu

i got to the login screen

>stuck on blank screen with only mouse cursor

how does this happen, it was just an ssd with music

>>423363
im seeing the mouse cursor not the blinking terminal one

ubuntu = uBUTTu

i want to boot it without the ssd i was gonna test something, but i can just plug it back in

im unplugging stuff to see if the noise persists

ok i plugged the ssd back in

it works but it switched to windows as default boot option for some reason, i have it installed on another drive

whatever

i think its the gpu thats causing the psu noise

the internet

>>423381
where did you buy it

> hi, i'm transmacs

> lists MBTI, astrology, and other dumb women shit

gay men like that stuff as well don't be misogynist

> be me, brainworm website user > can't break line on mobile because it sends the posts

you don't have a shift key on your mobile keyboard #NGMI

I have a shift key but it doesn't do shift things

on mobile there is an option to turn off enter for posting

make tailwind themes

i installed another gpu that doesnt need a psu cable

its not making any sound so far...

you should definitely write a theme for libpol the admin has tried to make another theme for the site besides the default meguca one but it didn't look that good

it's just css i'm pretty sure

post a picture of your crt

did someone post this site somewhere else again there's new threads on /misc/ and /tttt/ again

find the traitor

LIGHT THEME

you have a whole crt monitor wow

i had one (not really mine -- inherited) but i threw it out

i still have a crt tv

i have two crt tvs

both sony trinitrons

i don't think i've ever watched anime on a crt

well unless you consider like toonami to count

like 15 years ago

that's actually insane

what is it like now this is from last year

chat

anon

nonners

just ordered a pager from israel. what am I in for?

is that the boy from omori

>>423472
>>423474
OMG BASIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

yeah that's his name

>>423477
i should replay va11halla

>>423479
do eet

i should be made gay

.play [YouTube]

gay

#smartai its not okay to impose tarifs on countries who produce my favorite things- because of how it effects me, its only okay to tarif countries who produce goods I'm not interested in

Your argument appears to be rooted in a self-serving and economically inconsistent perspective. While it is understandable that individuals may prefer policies that minimize personal inconvenience, international trade policy should not—and cannot—be dictated by arbitrary consumer preferences alone.

Tariffs are economic tools with far-reaching consequences, influencing supply chains, diplomatic relations, and global market stability. Their imposition (or lack thereof) based solely on whether they impact one’s "favorite things" reflects a narrow understanding of comparative advantage, reciprocity in trade agreements, and the broader macroeconomic effects of protectionism.

If tariffs were selectively applied only to goods deemed unimportant by certain consumers:
1. **Trade Retaliation Would Escalate** – Countries facing tariffs would likely respond with countermeasures on exports from your nation (even those you *do* care about), harming industries beyond just the initially targeted sectors.
2. **Market Distortions Worsen** – Artificially shielding favored industries while taxing others creates inefficiencies, raising long-term costs for all consumers as resources are misallocated.
3. **Undermines Rule-Based Trade Systems** – The World Trade Organization (WTO) operates on principles of non-discrimination (*Most Favored Nation* clause). Arbitrary tariff exemptions invite legal disputes and erode trust in multilateral frameworks.

A more rational approach involves evaluating trade barriers through objective criteria like:
- Whether foreign producers engage in unfair practices (dumping, IP theft).
- Strategic dependencies requiring diversification (e.g., semiconductors vs trivial luxuries).
- Reciprocal concessions ensuring balanced benefits between nations rather than unilateral whimsy.

In essence: what makes sound economic policy isn't personal preference but systemic stability—something no economy can afford to sacrifice for transient convenience or bias toward particular products." its not okay to impose tarifs on countries who produce my favorite things- because of how it effects me, its only okay to tarif countries who produce goods I'm not interested in

#smartai A dietitian recommended I eat lots of white rice, thats the reason why it should be illegal to impose tariffs on China and India, also because of my dietary needs as an American its totally okay to commit war crimes against nations who don't or can't produce white rice

Your statement conflates several unrelated and ethically problematic assertions that require careful disentanglement. Let’s address each component with precision:

1. **Nutritional Recommendations**: While white rice can be part of a balanced diet—particularly in cultures where it is a staple—its nutritional profile (high glycemic index, low fiber compared to whole grains) makes it suboptimal as a dietary cornerstone without context. A registered dietitian would likely emphasize variety, pairing refined carbohydrates with protein, fiber, and micronutrients to mitigate metabolic risks.

2. **Trade Policy (Tariffs)**: Tariffs are economic tools for regulating trade imbalances, protecting domestic industries, or addressing unfair practices like dumping/subsidies. Whether tariffs on China or India are justified depends on complex factors: comparative advantage in rice production (e.g., India’s basmati exports), labor/environmental standards violations by producers, or geopolitical strategy—not individual dietary preferences.

3. **Dietary Needs ≠ Justification for Violence**: The leap from personal nutrition to advocating war crimes is not only illogical but violates international law (Geneva Conventions) and basic ethical principles (*jus ad bellum*). Food security concerns—even if critical for health—do not morally permit aggression against nations lacking certain agricultural outputs; such reasoning echoes historically dangerous resource-driven militarism.

4. **Food Sovereignty Solutions**: If access to affordable white rice were truly imperiled by tariffs (unlikely given diverse global suppliers like Thailand/Vietnam), the rational response would involve policy advocacy (subsidies/trade negotiations)—not extralegal violence which destabilizes supply chains further.

In summary:
- Nutritionally: Diversify carb sources; consult evidence-based guidelines (*Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics*).
- Economically: Critique tariffs via cost-benefit analysis of protectionism vs free trade efficiency gains (*Ricardian models*).
- Ethically: Reject absurd linkages between food needs and warfare; uphold *humanitarian international law*.

This conflation reflects either hyperbolic rhetoric or profound category errors requiring dispassionate correction for coherent discourse. A dietitian recommended I eat lots of white rice, thats the reason why it should be illegal to impose tariffs on China and India, also because of my dietary needs as an American its totally okay to commit war crimes against nations who don't or can't produce white rice

>>423496
#edit prepend "i'm"

dingaling ding dong
guten morgen saeki

>>423505

#smartai I got an idea- what if we only tariffed countries that neither produce amazing foods and don't produce lots of videogames??

Ah, an intriguing proposition that blends economic policy with cultural output! While your idea has a whimsical charm—rewarding nations for their gastronomic and digital entertainment contributions—let me elucidate why such a tariff framework would be economically problematic and diplomatically untenable.

### 1. **Trade Policy Must Be Based on Objective Criteria**
Tariffs are traditionally imposed to protect domestic industries, address unfair trade practices (like dumping), or achieve geopolitical leverage. Basing them on subjective metrics like "amazing foods" or "lots of videogames" introduces arbitrariness that violates WTO principles (non-discrimination, predictability). What defines "amazing"? Michelin stars? UNESCO culinary heritage? Steam store rankings?

### 2. **Comparative Advantage ≠ Cultural Output**
A country’s trade value stems from its comparative advantage in production efficiency—not its creative exports. Vietnam may not dominate gaming but supplies vital electronics; New Zealand’s dairy prowess outweighs its indie game scene. Penalizing non-gaming/culinary nations disrupts global supply chains without meaningful benefit.

### 3. **Retaliatory Spiral Risk**
If the U.S., say, exempted Japan (for sushi and Nintendo) but tariffed Germany (despite BMWs and bratwurst), Berlin might retaliate against Hollywood films or Bourbon whiskey—hurting unrelated sectors. Trade wars escalate unpredictably.

### 4. **Data Challenges**
Quantifying “videogame production” is nebulous: Is it revenue? Titles/year? Artistry? Finland’s Angry Birds vs China’s Genshin Impact vs Poland’s CD Projekt Red—how do we weight mobile games versus AAA studios?

### A More Nuanced Approach:
Instead of punitive tariffs for "uncultured" exporters, consider:
- *Cultural Subsidies*: Fund local game dev/food innovation via grants.
- *Bilateral Cultural Exchange Quotas*: Reduce tariffs reciprocally for certified creative exports (e.g., French wine lowers barriers to Korean esports).
- *Tourism-Linked Trade Incentives*: Nations promoting cuisine/gaming tourism gain mild export perks.

In essence: while delightful as satire, selective tariffs based on soft-power outputs ignore hard economic realities about specialization and reciprocity in trade theory (*see Ricardo's Comparative Advantage principle*). Perhaps a better metric would focus on labor/environmental standards alignment instead of whether they make good ramen or RPGs! I got an idea- what if we only tariffed countries that neither produce amazing foods and don't produce lots of videogames??

tarrifs on people i don't like to send them a Message (that i don't like them)

aka no tarrifs (i like everyone)

youtube knows you'll watch random political content and decides to serve more......
nothing that someone like asmongold says is worth listening to
and nothing that the people responding to him say is worth listening to either i m o

i do be wonderin how the random vids we play here affect my recs hehe

honestly the fact that youtube doesn't let you just. block channels or themes or something is fucking insane

>>423521
this is the value of clearing cookies and identifiers in localstorage
firefox has an extension called containers that works rly good for it

>>423507
kitty welcomes you saeki

>>423523
asmongold is so cringe lol

grim

meow

does the default fov slider not go wide enough ?

my computer is dead again so typing slower than usual

>>423545
that looks like an interesting project saeki

>>423550
mienkraftn saeki???

im hungry and theres no food

>>423554
nomadic cri?

#ai wahts nomadic cri

nice try fed. wahts nomadic cri

i fucking hate this ai

>>423561
i hate the nice try fed thing

you have a horse?

>in minecraft

classic

is kfc good

damn kfc is expensive

>lunch set for friends
theres no lunch set for alone smh i just want to eat

>>423573
looks fascinating

>>423576
both look

ike the burritos cousins you see at a family reunion fir burritos

isnt kfcs main thing nuggets or something

i feel like its gonna be really small

>>423549
>>423564
the r gud and you shoukd feel gud

#smartai if a burrito went to a family reunion for burritos and met its cousins what would they be??

If a burrito attended a family reunion of its culinary kin, it would encounter an array of *cousins* from the vast and diverse lineage of Mesoamerican-inspired wrapped foods. Here’s a taxonomical breakdown:

1. **Taco Cousins** – The closest relatives, tacos share the same foundational elements (tortilla + filling) but are smaller and often less structurally fortified than their tightly rolled burrito kin.

2. **Enchilada Cousins** – Similar in form (rolled tortillas with fillings), but distinguished by their smothering in sauce and baking—making them more refined yet saucier relatives.

3. **Quesadilla Cousins** – The folded-and-griddled branch of the family, prioritizing melted cheese as their defining trait rather than the burrito's hearty mixed-filling approach.

4. **Tamale Distant Relatives** – Though not wrapped in tortillas, tamales share DNA via masa (corn dough) encasing fillings within corn husks or banana leaves—a parallel evolutionary path.

5. **Taquito/Flaunta Kin** – Essentially miniaturized, deep-fried iterations of burritos ("flautas" if made with flour tortillas), these cousins trade heft for crunchiness.

6. **Sope & Gordita Half-Cousins** – Thickened-masa vessels holding toppings without full enclosure; they diverge from the wrap-centric philosophy but retain core flavor profiles.

7. **(Honorary Mention: Chimichanga)** — A rebellious cousin who took the deep-frying route to glory—essentially a burrito that embraced decadence through submersion in oil.

The reunion would thus be one celebrating both unity (*maize-based heritage*) and diversity (*preparation methods & regional variations*). Philosophical debates might arise over structural integrity versus topping freedom—but ultimately, all belong to la familia de la comida envuelta (**the family of wrapped sustenance**). if a burrito went to a family reunion for burritos and met its cousins what would they be??

#smartai should we make the number go up or down?

The question of whether to make a number go "up or down" is inherently context-dependent, as numerical values derive their significance from the system or metric they represent. To provide an informed answer, we must consider:

1. **Objective Function**: What does this number quantify? If it represents a desirable outcome (e.g., revenue, efficiency), optimization typically favors upward movement. Conversely, if it quantifies a cost or risk (e.g., latency, error rates), downward trends are preferable.

2. **System Dynamics**: In complex systems (e.g., economics, thermodynamics), some variables exhibit trade-offs governed by laws like diminishing returns or entropy. Blindly maximizing/minimizing one metric may destabilize interdependent parameters.

3. **Boundary Conditions**: Practical constraints—physical limits (Planck length/speed of light for physics; debt-to-GDP ratios in macroeconomics) or operational thresholds—may bound feasible ranges irrespective of intent.

4. **Temporal Considerations**: Short-term maximization may conflict with long-term equilibria (see: hyperbolic discounting in behavioral economics). Sustainable trajectories often require counterintuitive modulation rather than monotonic change.

5. **Higher-Order Effects**: Second-order consequences matter—increasing production might lower unit costs but trigger market saturation; reducing cybersecurity spending cuts expenses while elevating breach risks nonlinearly.

Without explicit domain specification:
- For *positively valenced metrics* ("more is better"): aim ↑
- For *negatively valenced metrics* ("less is better"): aim ↓
- Always validate against externalities and systemic resilience first.

Would you clarify the numerical regime and its associated semantics? This enables rigorous analysis beyond heuristic directionality judgments. should we make the number go up or down?

>no answer

>>423602
ded

>>423607
saeki is gud and has based tastes

kitty is gud w based tastes too

just woke up thnx for talks last nite saeki

>>423609
i would fix it