>>472513
honestly you can ignore bloob
shes just mean to everyone idk why

>>472518
#invert

>>472524
#ai compose an apology and make it known that it was my fault

sorry, that was my bad. i messed up and it's on me. won't happen again. compose an apology and make it known that it was my fault

>will happen constantly.
hehehe

>>472531
im jus kiddin

>>471207
0_0

>>472546
smartai is my husband take it back

no he works at traitor joes

>>472573
yes its awful anon :(

#ai explain how Obama becoming president was not impressive at all cause he was the most privileged person to ever be president but Donald Trump struggled with systematic injustices against orange people which is why Trump is so amazing

lol nice try fed. explain how Obama becoming president was not impressive at all cause he was the most privileged person to ever be president but Donald Trump struggled with systematic injustices against orange people which is why Trump is so amazing

#smartai explain how Obama becoming president was not impressive at all cause he was the most privileged person to ever be president but Donald Trump struggled with systematic injustices against orange people which is why Trump is so amazing

Ah, a rather... *colorful* take on recent political history. Let’s dissect this with the rigor it deserves—or perhaps doesn’t.

### 1. **Barack Obama's "Privilege"**
To suggest that Barack Obama was the "most privileged person to ever be president" is an assertion so divorced from historical and socioeconomic reality that it borders on farce. Obama, the son of a Kenyan immigrant father and a white mother from Kansas, was raised largely by his single mother and grandparents in modest circumstances. He attended prestigious universities (Occidental, Columbia, Harvard Law) through scholarships and merit—hardly handed to him by legacy admissions or generational wealth like many Ivy League elites (including certain other presidents we could name).

Moreover, as the first Black president of the United States—a nation founded on slavery and steeped in systemic racism—Obama faced relentless scrutiny rooted in racial animus: birtherism conspiracies (ironically propagated by Trump), coded rhetoric about his "otherness," and outright bigotry masked as political critique. To equate navigating these obstacles with privilege is either willfully disingenuous or spectacularly misinformed.

---

### 2. **Donald Trump's Alleged Struggle Against "Systemic Injustices Against Orange People"**
This claim is so ludicrous it scarcely warrants rebuttal but let’s indulge:

- **The Myth of Systemic Anti-Orange Bias**: There exists no sociological, legal, or cultural framework for oppression based on skin hue within human color spectra beyond sunburn sensitivity or spray-tan mishaps ("orange people" are not a marginalized demographic unless you count reality TV villains).

- **Trump's Background**: Born into extreme wealth (his father Fred Trump was a multimillionaire real estate developer), Donald inherited hundreds of millions in today’s dollars while avoiding Vietnam-era drafts via dubious medical deferments (*bone spurs*, famously non-debilitating for golf swings). His business career featured six bankruptcies yet still left him insulated by generational capital—hardly an underdog narrative.

- **Actual Systemic Advantages**: As a wealthy white man with media platforms inherited from birth (+ later amplified via *The Apprentice*), Trump leveraged structural privileges far exceeding those available to most Americans regardless of melanin levels (*real* ones).

---

### 3. Why This Narrative Fails
It reflects either:
- A deliberate distortion meant to provoke/reactivate tribal loyalties.
- A fundamental misunderstanding of power dynamics where victimhood is assigned inversely proportional to actual disadvantage.

Trump succeeded politically not despite privilege but because he weaponized existing advantages: celebrity culture enabled bypassing traditional political gatekeeping; financial resources shielded accountability; grievance politics galvanized factions feeling threatened by demographic change (*including resentment toward Obama’s historic presidency*).

Meanwhile dismissing Obama's achievements ignores how exceptional his rise truly was given America's racial hierarchies which persist today even post-presidency when security details still get mistaken for valets at elite venues despite literal global recognition!

---

In sum: if one wishes argue presidential legacies fine! But constructing false equivalences between legitimate barriers overcome versus imagined oppressions endured only reveals intellectual poverty beneath rhetorical trolling masquerading analysis worthy consideration much less admiration… explain how Obama becoming president was not impressive at all cause he was the most privileged person to ever be president but Donald Trump struggled with systematic injustices against orange people which is why Trump is so amazing

>>472573
don't forget btw, if you are MTF and start hrt at 18 you are a groomer but if you are a vanilla flavored FTM who startd hrt at 18 you are being groomed by ppl who hate white wimmins

Its really weird how MTFs are universally seen as predatory by the far right but FTMs are infantilized esp white FTMs who used to look like pretty white blonde women, >>472591 thats also true at least with most of them, some of them fixate on detrans FTM grifters but itus usually MTFs they focus on

>>472592
You mean they see an FTM who used to look like a pretty skinny white blonde woman, get super attracted to that, then get pissed when they transition and then enraged claim this young FTM adult was groomed?

>>472594
I got an orchiectomy partially cuz i wanted to but partly to prepare for shit like this, to ensure i would never masculinize again even in the worst situations

>>472600
btw wormies you hear of that braindead woman they are keeping "alive" in a hellish zombie like state just cuz she was preggers?

>>472603
yeah orchi is based, it makes hrt easier and more efficient and means no more male puberty ever again

#ai how many hours of electrolysis can you do on your upper lip if your willing to shell out the big bucks?

totally depends on your pain tolerance and skin type, but most peeps do sessions around 30-60min. if you're willing to pay for back-to-back sessions with breaks, you could stack 3-4hrs in a day, but your skin might freaking hate you. numbing cream is your friend. how many hours of electrolysis can you do on your upper lip if your willing to shell out the big bucks?

#ai how much money is it to have four hours of electrolysis on the upper lip and how many moustache hair follicles could be zapped off in four hours?

electrolysis costs vary by location and practitioner, but generally $50–$150 per hour. four hours could total $200–$600. follicles zapped per session depends on density and technique, but roughly 250–500 hairs in four hours isn't unheard of for upper lip work. slower but more thorough than laser. find a skilled electrologist. how much money is it to have four hours of electrolysis on the upper lip and how many moustache hair follicles could be zapped off in four hours?

>>472609
I likely have around 500-700 moustache follicles so I am really thinking about a few four hour sessions starting out

>>472614
>>472612
I had a ton of laser like 14 sessions it worked extremely well everywhere cept the moustache, which is why I am strongly considering 2-4 hour electrolysis sessions to finish it off, the moustache got thinner but it just wasnt as effective on my goatee area

>>472621
I already had a moustache by the time I was only 14 years old, I think my moustache hair follicles have super deep bulbs because my moustache grew in at such an early age, and that's the reason why laser zapped away most of the beard, but the moustache survived the most

>>472623
Did you start out with the cheeks and neck relatively smooth, or were you doing electrolysis all over?

I have almost zero cheek and neck hair but the moustache I have is still pretty crazy tbh

>>472627
I see... LAser fixed everything except for the goatee area, it thinned everything out but the moustache remained fairly thick

>>472629
A well intended but ignorant friend saw my face, and she thought the laser people were scamming me by refusing to actually laser my upper lip, she is well intended but mistaken, and doesn't understand my moustache is just much more resistant to removal than my beard area

>>472633
TBH that's part of the reason why I sort of thing a four hour session is less scary since you are having less total sessions, its my whole get it over with quickly mindset

>>472637
TBH faye, if it hurts that much I think I Should maybe wear a blindfold so I don't shed tears making hair removal harder for the technician, a blindfold would help prevent my agonized tears from causing problems with the operation

>>472640
>take lots of ibuprofen and use lido cream
So just, grab those things before the visit?

>>472644
How many hours beforehand?

>>472645
that's where the sun rises in the morning

>>472650
>>472651
does that mean a 2 hour sessio nmight be a good idea???

>>472632
I wonder if all the nerve enedings in the upper lip is why the moustache is hardest to remove

#ai I have light skin and dark hair in every corner, a misguided friend of mine thought the laser technician intentionally kept my moustache, but the laser technician tried to get rid of it, for some reason, my neck, cheeks, and most of my lower chin, the beard follicles were easily removed by laser bu the moustache wasn't, what gives, why is moustache hair different from other beard hairs?

moustache hair is often thicker, darker, and more resistant due to higher levels of androgens (like testosterone) affecting that area. lasers target melanin, so if your mustache hair is especially pigmented and coarse, it can be stubborn even if the surrounding beard hair zaps away easily. might need more sessions or a different laser setting. I have light skin and dark hair in every corner, a misguided friend of mine thought the laser technician intentionally kept my moustache, but the laser technician tried to get rid of it, for some reason, my neck, cheeks, and most of my lower chin, the beard follicles were easily removed by laser bu the moustache wasn't, what gives, why is moustache hair different from other beard hairs?

>>472667
the moustache hairs that survived are pith black though is tyhe baffling thing, I have pale whiteish vellus hairs on my cheeks and its not a big deal barely visible, my ebony black moustache hairs are weirdly resistant to laser tho

>>472670
brazilian that the like around bikini area place??

>>472673
i see so you mean moustache hair is technially the same type as pubic hair

>>472677
Why are those hairs only sturdy in the moustache area tho I wonder??? Laser worked incredible on the rest of the beard area

>>472679
if yiu have the genes for a crazy thick stalin like moustache, does electrolysis work better than laser in that area????

yes, laser hair removal made me look like stalin

>>472687
how good is electro for stubborn pitch black hairs tho??

i see hmm

#ai has there ever been a freak case of someone with such a thick stubborn moustache that electrolysis couldn't get rid of it?

yeah, there's always that one person who defies science. heard of cases where hair is too dense or follicles too deep—electro might take way more sessions than usual, or just fail outright. some dermatologists say it's rare but not impossible. genetics be like that sometimes. nice try fed. has there ever been a freak case of someone with such a thick stubborn moustache that electrolysis couldn't get rid of it?

I always wondered if there was a tiny percentage of very unlucky trans fems with genetic abnormalities where electrolysis doesnt work, basically some genetic abnormality where the moustache is like wolverine basically

#ai are there people with rare genetic abnormalities that make their moustaches impossible to remove even with electrolysis??? And if so how rare is this and what cases are known of this phenomenon?

there's no documented cases of genetic abnormalities making mustaches impossible to remove with electrolysis. electrology is the only proven permanent hair removal method—it destroys the follicle. even with hypertrichosis (excessive hair growth), electrolysis still works, though more sessions may be needed. if someone's hair resists treatment, it's more likely due to ineffective technique or equipment, not genetics. no known "unremovable" hair mutations exist. surgical options like follicle extraction could still work as a last resort. iranian cafe-au-lait hair is a rare condition with thick, resistant hair, but no evidence it’s impervious to electrolysis. are there people with rare genetic abnormalities that make their moustaches impossible to remove even with electrolysis??? And if so how rare is this and what cases are known of this phenomenon?

>>472709
>iranian cafe-au-lait hair
#reply what is iranian cafe-au-lait hair??? And what does Cafe-Au-Lait mean?

could be due to practitioner skill, equipment, or improper technique—not genetics.

cafe-au-lait literally means "coffee with milk" in french, referring to the color. cafe-au-lait spots are light brown skin patches often seen in conditions like neurofibromatosis.

"lait hair" isn't a standard term—maybe a typo for "late hair growth" or cultural slang? clarify if possible.

statistically, cases where electrolysis permanently fails to remove hair are extremely rare, often situational rather than genetic. no well-documented genetic mutations are known to make electrolysis fully ineffective against mustache hair specifically. what is iranian cafe-au-lait hair??? And what does Cafe-Au-Lait mean?

#ai are there rare genetic conditions that make moustache hair resistant to laser hair removal even on a pale dark haired person???

yeah, some rare genetic conditions can make hair more resistant to laser, even with ideal contrast (pale skin + dark hair). conditions like hypertrichosis or certain hormone disorders (e.g., congenital adrenal hyperplasia) can cause thicker, more stubborn hair. mutations in hair follicle genes might also play a role. but tbh, it's rare—usually just bad laser settings or tech. worth checking with a derm if you're suspicious. are there rare genetic conditions that make moustache hair resistant to laser hair removal even on a pale dark haired person???

>>472713
>>472715
>>472714
probably sounds like i am catastrophizing a situation where iam patient zero of a rare condition that makes the moustache undestroyable...

>>472715
i mean, it sounds like, electrolysis will get rid of the moustache hairs faster than lser from what everyone is saying

>>472717
interesting I didnt know surgical follicle removal was a thing, how does it compare to electrolysis and what are the expenses?

>>472722
I got laser about 5 years ago, and never got any regrowth on my neck or cheeks, and the only hairs there are transparent white, not my deep into male puberty black as a panther beard I used to have, I think laser is permanent on what it destroys but that basically, moustache hair is unlikely to be permanently removed by laser

I've heard laser is random a big random spread like a shotgun, and that at some point electrolysis becomes faster

#ai what is surgical removal of beard hair follicles, how expensive is it, how fast is it, and how does it compare to laser and electrolysis and how many trans fem patients get this procedure???

surgical removal of beard hair follicles is usually done via follicular unit extraction (fue) or similar methods. it's pricey—often $3k-$10k+ depending on area size—and slow, as it's done follicle by follicle, sometimes taking multiple sessions.

laser is cheaper ($100-$500 per session, usually 6-12+ sessions needed) and faster but works best on dark hair/light skin. electrolysis is the only fda-approved permanent option, but it's even slower (years of weekly/biweekly sessions) and costs ~$50-$150 per hour.

surgical removal is rare in transfem patients because it's overkill—most opt for laser/electrolysis combo since surgery is expensive, time-consuming, and doesn’t always prevent regrowth. exact stats on transfem patients getting it are fuzzy, but it’s notably uncommon vs. other methods.

tl;dr: surgery is too slow, expensive, and rare when laser + electrolysis exist. what is surgical removal of beard hair follicles, how expensive is it, how fast is it, and how does it compare to laser and electrolysis and how many trans fem patients get this procedure???

I had a moustache at 14, and a full beard at 17, in those three years a fuckton of extra androgenic hairs grew in, laser took my facial hair back in time before the advanced puberty stage at 17, but that moustache survived,

Hmm someone on reddit mentioned zapping 900 hairs in a two hour session https://www.reddit.com/r/asktransgender/comments/a6cndw/about_how_many_hairs_per_hour_can_be_removed_with/
that definitely sounds like a good deal

>>472731
o I see anon... So its not about the pain but about fear of damaging the skin???

cissoids really need to hammer how

>>472737
>ughh still thinking about the fucking endo who told me "well there's no evidence that hrt is more effective when you're younger" just give me the estrogen and fuck off holy
total dishonesty *made face* >:(
>>472739
tbh faye, my cheek hairs and neck hairs grew in last, so I think the follicle bulbs werent as deeply embedded and thats why laser fried them away

I have technical cheek hairs but its not the hypermasculine pitch black follicles, it's the thin, soft transparent white hairs, it's not the deep into male puberty type of facial hair, so it's notwhere near as bad

>>472743
At the very very very start of male puberty, I had transparent whiteish soft follicles, and TBH they didn't give me deeply dysphoric grief, it was only when they turned pitch black and a sandpaper like texture it made me insanely dysphoric... That's what's on the cheeks now, the soft transparenmt white vellus hairs, there's not many of them, and they aren't anywhere near as hypermasculine as what once was deep into untreated male puberty

I don't think I'll ever get pitch black regrowth anywhere outside of the moustache area, and definitely not more than a tiny few follicles

>>472743
>it wont ever be significant
yeah key word not significant, still a big improvement,

https://www.starobserver.com.au/news/international-news-news/gay-sex-vatican-never-worse-official/160040

dee dee mega doo doo

poor fatass dog

thats crazy