returncatalogbottom
rules1. you must be 18+ to use this site 2. no NSFW/gore 3. no bigotry 4. if staff don't like your post they may delete it or ban you
sæкі
would..
anon
I have been trying to work on my straight knees
anti
>>664107
do u wanna hear me talk abt fuckin uhhhh isopods or some shit
>>664119
sæкі
I used to use class of 09 images but its
sæкі
its awful all the stuff the guy did that I learned about and I just cant enjoy it anymore cus its also a joke at my expense
I Love Fat Women
yeah
fentmom
>>664113
that would honestly help
>>664115
that too i like isopods theyre good guys they can stay
I Love Fat Women
I fucking love this movie
fentmom
oh my god i have like this series of videos stuck in my head and its all because of I Love Fat Womens name
fentmom
it was like these chubby 20 something girls fucking around doing like music videos and like
fentmom
it was really similar to some of the videos on wormwatch
fujo
my brain doesn't work when i don't feed it i think
>>664133
fentmom
the songs were all about being slutz and bling and shit
sæкі
awww ;-;
anti
oooooh
I Love Fat Women
I love I-BE AREA
anon
>>664132
I was burned for zero damage, the scars will make for good party talk
fujo
>>664137
i had jogurt and banana for breakfast and like pasta with tomato sauce just a few minutes ago
anti
controversial opinion perhaps but true
fujo
>>664139
#refute

oh wow, what a groundbreaking thesis. let me just drop everything and praise this galaxy-brain take. except—oops—reality disagrees.

first off, food isn’t just "good." that’s embarrassingly simplistic. have you ever choked on a stale pretzel? ever bitten into a slimy, underripe avocado? ever had rancid milk curl your soul into a shriveled raisin? yeah, thought so. food can be *disgusting*, and pretending all of it is categorically "good" is the kind of childish naivety i’d expect from someone who eats cereal dry because they can’t handle the complexity of pouring milk.

second, even if we charitably assume you meant *good food* (which, judging by your stunning lack of detail, you didn’t), you’re still wrong. people have allergies. people have dietary restrictions. people suffer from scarcity while others drown in the obscene gluttony of excess. your shallow, one-word reduction doesn’t even begin to touch the systemic, cultural, and physiological complexities surrounding food. maybe try thinking beyond toddler-level consumption next time, yeah?

and don’t even get me started on ethics. cruelty in factory farming, exploitation of agricultural labor, food deserts, imperialism’s impact on global gastronomy—but sure, let’s all clap for captain obvious over here, gracing us with the revelation that food is "good." pathetic.
>>664142
anti
>>664141
#refute

wait, hang on—are we seriously having this debate? *really?* like, did you just *accidentally* oversimplify existence this hard, or is this some kind of elaborate bit? because here’s the thing: **obviously** not all food is good in every context. but to leap from "food is good" to "this person clearly lacks taste buds and also likely thinks ketchup is a spice" is—and forgive me for being blunt—*absurdly* stupid.

of course stale pretzels are bad. congratulations, you've identified the absolute least compelling exception possible. yeah, sometimes food sucks. sometimes socks get holes. sometimes the wifi drops. *what’s your point?* does that mean socks are fundamentally bad? should we all rage-quit the internet because buffering exists? grow up.

the *actual* argument (that you bulldozed past, presumably in your rush to be wrong) is that food, as a concept and biological necessity, *tends toward goodness*—it nourishes, delights, and anchors culture. the baseline experience of eating is *overwhelmingly positive* for the vast majority of humans, barring edge cases (e.g., food poisoning, your questionable cooking). but sure, yeah, hyperfocus on that one time you licked a rotten egg like it’s some kind of gotcha.

and can we talk about the lazy faux-intellectualism of "galaxy-brain," by the way? you’re not uncovering hidden truths here. you’re being a contrarian twit about *emergent properties of sustenance.* wow, profound. next you’ll declare that water is wet, except when it’s frozen—checkmate, hydrologists.

so let’s recap: your counterargument is "*food can sometimes be bad*"? cool. you win the "no shit, sherlock" olympics. here’s your medal made of expired yogurt. enjoy.

(oh, and for the record: dry cereal slaps, you uncultured philistine.)
I Love Fat Women
Is... is that dan?
fujo
>choked on a stale pretzel
this thing is way too german
I Love Fat Women
wait
anon
.skip (voted to skip this video)
anti
this is a banger
I Love Fat Women
awww fine
sæкі
hehe
sæкі
, ;3
I Love Fat Women
>>664150
thats so gay.
<3
anti
the wind keeps closing my window
anti
bye bye!
sæкі
>>664149
if ur in the headspace or up to it, would u wanna listen to the new darknet diaries ep together ? is gud n think you'd like, if can keep company, but also wan gib space
>>664177
I Love Fat Women
imma log off
I Love Fat Women
adieu
anti
i will see u again fat women lover
sæкі
and
sæкі
awww
sæкі
baiiii
anti
#ksay there will always be a moon over marin
sæкі
god,, I need to write my piece and send it to Jack eventually, again
giving myself some space and time
sæкі
heh
sæкі
aw
sæкі
is that ur pic
sæкі
I have black and white film photos I took or rope net walls
fujo
actually i think it could make for a interesting subject but no its not my pic
sæкі
of*
anon
Is sad, but I am aight, I might be trying to go out with stepmom and dad because they are also bummed and it'd be nice to just do smthn, so I may not be on later tonight
sæкі
mhm
sæкі
ye, just wan let u do what's comfy n just checking ,3, and awa, I hope u can if ur up to it <3
anon
I appreciate it alot cutie
sæкі
might be nice
sæкі
appreciate u lots, too, cutie
sæкі
ooo
sæкі
I'll make an album or folder on mega of my photography to show
sæкі
I have mostly shared my cosplay or other stuff to peeps
anon
You should!
anon
I alsready stole uh nona's pic and used it as my BG for a while
sæкі
and d'awwww, that's rly sweet
sæкі
I have, on my phone, a software that lets me code shaders that run as my background
anon
The issue is that I usually favor darker pics for my BG so I only had it for a bit, might set like a slideshow as my background though
sæкі
I have a slow moving rainbow shader that scrolls across the screen
0.9474%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i have a controversial opinion
>>664198
0.9475%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
"leave no trace" is stupid
>>664202>>664201
sæкі
its also like
anon
>>664202
It means when you are out camping and such, don't make rock cairns or other gay shit
sæкі
I could go into it, its a good goal to have but its basically impossible in reality
0.9476%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
because we will literally soy jerk off about finding some random paintings from thousands of ytears ago but if someone now wants to make a random painting they're literally nature hitler
>>664208>>664211
0.9477%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
it's insane
0.9478%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664211
actually no you can't people will literally call you nature hitler no matter what you use
anon
>>664205
Okay but you can find tens of thousands of paintings in places for paintings. People are going to nature to get away from that
>>664212
sæкі
oh
sæкі
like that
sadmoder
>>664205
you can draw in caves but you gotta use ochre thems the rules
>>664207
fujo
just use spraycans
anon
>>664212
idk rock cairns and stuff are just kinda gay. I don't seethe about it, but I like the rule
0.9480%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i like seeing traces of people
>>664219
0.9481%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
obviously don't leave a mess
romeo (phone)
haiiiiii
0.9482%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
but like i was watching the video of "the monolith" thing in utah, and it's objectively an interesting art piece that people wanna see but it was taken down by the "leave no trace" people because muh nature
anon
>>664215
I have traces of people in my blood 24/7 and piss out a credit card once a year, people are nice and all, but the flipside is that there are places that should be left relatively untouched by us
>>664224
sæкі
heya romeo!
sæкі
gah I just thought about
sæкі
I was considering trying to give a victim impact speech to the court but I dunno
anti
rock cairns are stupid
0.9483%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664219
absolutely not we should own everything
>>664226
0.9484%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
if i wrote random shit on a tree 500 years ago you wouild literally be right now soying out about how cool it is and historical but if I do that tomorrow, then you'll literally be like "omg NOOOOOO LEAVE NOT TRACE MUH HUMANS ARE HECKIN BAD OKAY"
>>664228
anti
>>664224
the whole world must become an extended walmart parking spot
romeo (phone)
i love WALMART!!!!!!
0.9485%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
im just saying it's the same thing i feel about a lot of historical buildings in america too
0.9486%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
like if they don't have real historical significance you're literally preserving nothing and preventing creating new art and culture it's so cringe
romeo (phone)
my middle school was a "historical building" because it was built in the 1920s, it had literal asbestos in the walls and they weren't allowed to remove it because the historical status made it illegal to remodel
0.9487%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
no one cares about miss poppy jenkins the racist house who was built in 1883 and there's like 150 other houses like that in the town
anti
i think 500 years ago they did not have plastic paints lmao
anon
My college has a few WPA murals that are nice
>>664237
anti
im strongly pro leave no trace largely bc of the volume of people going out nowadays
0.9488%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i think it's cringe
sæкі
wanna get to visit someday or stuffs
>>664240
anti
if everyone goes "erm i want to cave paint and stack rocks" shit goed to fuck
>>664242
anon
>>664238
it's a nice campus, but it also gets trashed during football season hard lol
0.9489%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664239
yeah and then it becomes interesting and an art piece and 50 years from now people are gonna be like "wow this is so cool loook at all of the art and random shit around this area"
>>664248
sæкі
aw
sæкі
yeah that happens
anti
i think you can do those things elsewhere
sadmoder
imagine not going to a football college like whats the point
0.9490%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
NIMBY
>>664249
0.9491%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
not in my backyard do it somewhere else
sæкі
>>664248
#this (you won't hear this in the mainstream)
anti
is that some yankee bullshit
sæкі
I wanna
0.9493%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
you looking at nature is literally art
sæкі
get back into drawing
sæкі
I have my art notebook somewhere around here, I planned to send some pics of my sketches from when I was 13-16
anon
>>664253
I am going to drive an 18 wheeler through your home
0.9494%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i'm just saying
>>664262
anti
me when i hate untouched nature
0.9495%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i think it's silly and if you want nice clean nature blah blah blah then buy land and protect it yourself
>>664266
anon
>>664259
I've seen what people have done to old shit in the Grand Canyon and such. Certain things should just be left alone
>>664265
sæкі
I'll see if I can, a long with the photography
sæкі
I have prints of those too,,
0.9496%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664262
if you think it's worth preserving, take a picture! otherwise things change such is ACTUAL NATURE this artifical preservation that we do is CRINGE
>>664267>>664269
anti
>>664261
literally what a nature reserve is
0.9497%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664267
humans are a part of nature
>>664270
anon
>>664265
Things change isn't an argument against the idea that certain things should be preserved. Things change is an is not an ought
>>664274>>664275
anti
>>664268
does that make ecosystem collapse good
0.9498%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
it means we are a part of the ecosystem
sadmoder
what happens when the exostsyem nk linger supports us
anti
yeah and we're also smart enough to not let it collapse hopefully
0.9499%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664269
it is, it is actually my opinion as to why we don't have any new designs or anything new or any new architecture we're so focused on the past and preserving and obsessing about what we used to do that we don't create anything new
>>664277
sæкі
I'm not gonna get into the whole archivist and preservation discussion rn cus I could get into it for ages
anon
>>664274
I understand the idea broadly, and don't get me wrong, my mind will literally glaze over when people talk about how things should be like the good old days and like the fetishization of single family detached homes and such. But the flipside is that certain things are worth keeping around even if they get in the way sometimes
>>664286
sæкі
n just dosed
0.9500%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
it's so cringe
0.9501%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
like europe does it right imo
>>664280
0.9502%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
you have historically preserved buildings, sure, but you actually allow those buildings to change and grow,
>>664287
anti
we conserve more buildings than the yanks do lmao
0.9503%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
if you have a historically preserved building in america you are literally not allowed to do anything with it
anti
inner city monument laws are notoriously so strict nobody wants to buy those buildings except for nerds (conservation funds) and millionaires
0.9504%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664277
sure some things, that have actual historical significance, but i think that we are too broadly obsessed with it
anon
>>664282
The uh, I forget the name but it's on Jackson Square, I think it is called the Presbetyre??? but it is a historical building they converted to a museum
0.9505%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
again there are homes in my town that literaly you cant do anything with not because they are worth anything but because they are old
anti
boog idk if u understand that the only modern city centre in rhe entire netherlands only ecists bc the it was bombed to the ground by the germansa
>>664291
anon
New Orleans heavily regulates constructions in the French Quarter because there is a certain idea that the French Quarter embodies
>>664293
0.9506%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664289
yes but you don't have to tear down a building to chang eit
>>664294
romeo (phone)
i think im gonna leave until u guys are done fighting
>>664296
0.9507%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664290
yeah i think that's crigne
>>664295
anti
>>664291
most of my hometown centre is unchanged from 80 years ago
anon
>>664293
You would not find the French Quarter anywhere else in the World, it's a concept that has disappeared
>>664297
sæкі
>>664292
#hug
I'm gonna look for my old art book and try n take photos finally, and compile my photography in the folder to share w peeps
>>664300
0.9508%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664295
ok and if its worth preserving then let it stand on its own
>>664301
0.9509%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
don't mandate that people have to stay with the style if its actually worth anything
anti
erm actually the free market will solve it🤓
>>664303
anon
>>664297
It underpins the entire tourism industry for the city. But the fact of the matter is that individuals would not preserve it, it could only be preserved through a systemic decision, otherwise short termism would win out and the entire thing would look like a crappy hipster downtown you could find anywhere in Texas lol
>>664307
0.9510%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
then the city should own all of the buildings
0.9511%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664299
aren't you an anarchist how are you even making fun of this
>>664305
fentmom
im like really mad rn but i dont know what im mad at
anti
im literally not
fentmom
me and antitwink belong to the same party we're just the right and left wings respectively
0.9513%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
give it 100 years and you would be soying about how the crappy hipster downtown is historically significant and amazing and we should preserve that
>>664311
anon
>>664307
It'd be gone and the city would die
anon
>>664309
Yes, I do soy out about the neon districts in San Antonio, how did you know?
anti
i already soy out abt the 80's 'suburbs' in my city
0.9514%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
im just saying just becuase it's old doesn't mean it's worthwhile
>>664314
anon
>>664313
There's more to the French Quarter than being old
0.9515%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i would disagree
anon
It represents a confluence of cultures in an era where men were desperate to keep everyone separated
anti
like sure theres some stuff you can tear down or build on top of but replacing your entire city with generic skyscraper yankcity #560 doesnt help
>>664322
anti
try tearing down the suburbs and building something worthwhile there instead
sæкі
I'm just a radical archivist but I don't have much interest in buildings specifically, though I do believe we should work towards saving them and
all things come from concepts being built on from the past, and every generation has said both that things feel samey and that the changes are too weird or ugh, whether or not they're right or wrong
but
we should be letting people design and let outsiders be able to design more of these projects, unlike how we do now with such design guidelines that create these samey buildings
>>664320
anon
That being said, like I do agree generally that sometimes the whole VGHing can get out of control at times, but alot of the VGHing tends to come from ideas and lifestyles about how things should be
0.9516%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664317
yesssssss this is so based new stuff sucks yessss omg go off so bassssed yessssssss
>>664323
anti
>>664322
you are very mad that i do not respect american architecture
>>664326
0.9517%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
we must be stuck in the past foreverrrrrrr yessssssssssssssssssssssss yessssssssssssssssssss lets goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo take me back to the stone buildings plz
anti
went to rotterdam once and it sucked and thats what i base my opinions off
>>664343
0.9518%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664323
i don't care about american architecture i just care about no one is doing anything new
>>664330
0.9519%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i think that's cringe
anti
tear down the suburbs and build something bew there I've seen your dipass sprawls
0.9520%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
yeah suburbs are also cringe
0.9521%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664330
yeah and i hate them architects are dumb
>>664333
sæкі
- u-
anon
>>664331
idk I think that some architects, and contemporary glass and steel architects, can be cool dudes
0.9522%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
yeah in the past
0.9523%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
now they're just art school rejects
0.9524%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
when they used to force architects to learn more about buildings they were based
anon
I mean most architects have to run through a mix of the STEM gauntlet and some history shit
>>664339
anti
"tear down old buildings to build new things but also modern architects suck"
>>664342
0.9525%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664337
as someone who did civil engineering no
0.9526%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
they don't know how things fit together, even most civil engineers don't know how things fit together everything is so specialized
>>664344
anti
i dont think u need to decimate historic buildings to build new things
0.9527%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664338
yeah
fentmom
>>664325
i only know rotterdam from the levels in hitman contracts
>>664348
anon
>>664340
Now it sounds like you are yearning for days long past when people had to draft things by hand and fully understand their art
>>664353
0.9528%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i'm not i literally want people to build new things that's it
anti
i just dont think thats true
0.9529%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
ban all historical preservation
>>664350>>664349
anti
>>664343
deeply soulless and evil city
anon
>>664347
I disagree, my preferred hot take is to shit on small businesses
0.9530%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664349
i don't
anon
But I do kind of understand where you are coming from, at least in terms of alot of land and such being used inefficiently, I just think there are certain things that cannot really be quantified in terms of value and that put simply the objective isn't always to maximize efficiency
0.9531%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664344
it's hard to design something that's actually good if you literalyl do not understand how the building comes together, that's why frequently they will design incredibly stupid shit and then it will get ruined by civil engineers who have to make sure the building doesn't like fall down etc
>>664371
anti
i think tearing down any and all limits to let the world be paved over forever is bad
0.9532%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i think that if it was worth preserving people would stop it
anti
and you cant praise european policy and then say these things bc European cities keep a very tight grip on these things
fentmom
the british public could be easily talked into eliminating the green belt if the papers really tried their best but they would regret it immensely and it would be yapped and cried over for decades afterwards
0.9533%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
european policy, at the very least, is better than american policy on this
anti
it sounds like your proposed solution is no policy
0.9534%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
yes
anti
dumbass ancap shit
0.9535%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
that's not capatlist or ancap
anti
yes it is
0.9536%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
no its not lmao
anti
unless you retroactively amend every post with "in a post-capitalist society" it is lmao
0.9537%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i'm arguing from a macro persepctive that it would be better to have no policy on this yes
anti
what does that mean
0.9538%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i mean i don't really care what ideology is present
0.9539%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i think that mandating preservation of things is cringe, i think if its worth being preserved then the people will preserve it
>>664372
anon
>>664353
Yeah, but we all work together as a team!!!!1!
0.9540%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
there is the people
0.9541%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
how does greek architecture still stand through tons of wars and different regimes
anti
there is a conglomerate of mass landlords and corporations that will destroy everything you hold dear
anon
This whole discussion reminds me of a movie I watched
0.9542%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
because people thought it was worth being preserved
>>664381
anon
about a uh Chinese bathhouse and how like that sort of way of life was coming to a close for them
anon
And it was all like sad and such
anti
i was involved in fighting my Municipality to preserve one of the three old buildings from the jewish quarter left standing over the germans
>>664382>>664387
anon
>>664377
Alot of the shift to preserve ancient Greek stuff came externally from Romanticists
>>664383
anti
>>664380
*after the germans came through
anon
>>664383
Again, alot of that came from Romanticists who specifically followed the logic that even if this isn't the most efficient, this is worth preserving at a societal level
0.9544%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664385
yeah that's a really cool part of the buildings history
>>664391
anti
>>664380
if there was no policy and no squatters they'd have tore it down and turned it straight into luxury appartments
anon
Or would they be called Romantics, idk I know that tea had to correct me when I kept saying Romanticist
anti
the only reason we cd save it was by making an appeal to the monuments department but that was one of the 3 buildings the germans left standing
anti
along with the big synagogue and the old elderly yome
anon
>>664386
The Colosseum was very nearly destroyed until the Pope stepped in and declared it a holy site, it likely would have been completely scrapped for materials
>>664392
0.9545%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664391
yeah and that was a sick part of the collesums history it was literally used as apartments
>>664398
fentmom
i dont want things that are characteristic of my countrys history and culture destroyed and paved over and replaced with shit indicative of the current new-rich tastes (crypto millionaire from nashville style shit)
>>664394>>664395
0.9546%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664393
yes so you don't want your culture to grow or change
>>664396>>664397
fentmom
>>664395
do not attempt to troll me here
anti
>>664395
thats not what was in that post i think
anon
>>664392
Like I don't think you fully understand, the Colosseum likely would not exist had the Pope not stepped in and said "this is being preserved whether you like it or not"
>>664408
anti
you just made that up
0.9547%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>i don't want things that are characteristic of my countrys history and culture destroyed and paved over
idk how –
>>664401>>664406
0.9548%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
eles to read that
anti
stop making shit up in your head
0.9549%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i literally quoted the post
anti
the post doesnt say that
anon
>>664400
I think that's a fair argument tbh
0.9550%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664401
you literally halted me when i quoted the post
>>664409
fentmom
cities becoming reflective of this increasingly globalised class of tasteless gauche people is not my culture evolving
>>664414
anti
there were plans floated in the 80's to modernize my city's centre and it'd have wiped out all traces of its history
0.9551%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
just because you personally find something tasteless doesn't mean it is
0.9552%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
to other people it's a subjective opinion
anon
>>664410
One eras gauche cosmopolitan elite is another eras golden age worth preserving
>>664416
anon
I still am supportive of generally maintaining the character of certain regions and protecting historical buildings, even if it cuts into bottom lines or isn't supported by some sort of plebiscite of people
fentmom
>>664414
i do not think future generations will look back fondly on the whole nashville new rich era
anti
boog i want to ask if you are capable of squaring the positions of "some old things should be preserved" and "new things should be built" in your head
fentmom
these beautiful interiors of houses gutted to look "utilitarian" for the husband
>>664421
anti
is it possible to see those as compatible at all
anti
or is your brain rotted by yankee all or nothing ideology
>>664422
anon
>>664418
I can't say what people would look back on nostalgically, but I already see alot of people that want to maintain some of the sort of 90's architecture and design. And I know people that appreciate the steel and glass looks of the contemporary movement
>>664423>>664425
0.9553%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664420
lmao fuck off
anti
i can go out into my city and see the walls where lesbians in the 70's would go out and spraypaint propaganda
fentmom
>>664421
though i do get what you mean here, as a kid i used to appreciate all brutalist buildings though now ive changed and i only really like the BFI and such
anon
>>664423
That'd be like picking out the megapastors of the 90's to determine that the era had little to no value
anti
and i can see where the germans were headquartered and from where they moved people to the camps
anti
to me, at least having a p strong bond to my city and province and language, that stuff is really important to see in daily life
anon
I hate Dubai though, I am hopeful that when there is a limited nuclear exchange in the Middle East, Dubai gets hit lol
anti
dubai deserves it dipass slave city state
fentmom
crazy how if you ask someone off the street "where would you wanna go on holiday if you could rn" i think 30% of your answers would be Dubai
fentmom
like what would you do in dubai if you're not some sort of mega rich connected criminal or one of their subjects or contractors or such
>>664434
0.9554%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
if that's the case doesn't that mean that people actually do like the new stuff
anon
>>664432
From what I understand, Dubai isn't even like *the place* to go, I think it is uh.... I forget the name, but it's one of the few emirates out there where you can drink and fuck all you want without regulation. Dubai is run like a medieval fiefdom with more money than it knows what to do with. Forgive the 4chan term but it is SOVLLESS
fentmom
just wander around... go shopping...
anti
i think dubai is mostly a status thing
anti
like its the definitive rich asshole city
fentmom
yeah i think a lot of people just want to say they've been to dubai to signify to their friends They Made It
anti
i do like some of their weird wacky buildings though
fentmom
i went to abu dahbi that was enough
anti
if they weren't in a slave state I'd fuck w em
romeo (phone)
abu dhabi is 10x cooler
>>664445
fentmom
romeo it was so spooky
fentmom
really nice airport and its surrounded by all these high tech buildings .. then you just get on the plane and as it takes off you see that theres only a few skyscrapers and that the rest of the city is all these sand coloured houses and hovels that stretch on for a bit and then disappear into the night desert
anon
>>664442
Yeah I think Abu Dhabi is the one that is more Vegas-y and sort of like the sin city. Whereas Dubai tries to be that but doesn't make the sacrifices (letting people fuck and drink)
0.9555%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
interesting looking city
anti
i think i am uuhhhh
anti
not gonna go to the emirates any time soon
fentmom
strangest place ive been
anon
I have zero intent on going to the UAE, I hate them all lol
>>664453
romeo (phone)
i like the yas marina circuit it's a pretty decent closer for the f1 season
anti
i dont like that their whole economy is based on oil and slavery
0.9556%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664450
uhhhhh
anon
And I've been to Russia before
>>664457
0.9557%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
what do you mean by all
>>664456
fentmom
my dad (5'6) said that lenin looked "small" like ok big guy
anon
>>664457
NO And I was so mad about that, it was closed at the time for the World Cup presumably because they didn't want some drunk guy running in and fucking it up
0.9558%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
where is marx buried again
>>664464
fentmom
camden
fentmom
ive been meaning to go there soon
0.9559%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
where is camden
fentmom
camden in london
0.9560%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
oh okay how did he make it all the way over there i knew he was in austria for a bit the whole gun story or whatever
>>664470
fentmom
he lived in london for most of his working life
fentmom
anti do you have a discord
>>664471
anon
>>664467
I think there is a Sabaton song written about this
fentmom
wahoo
0.9561%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
if you guys are this mad about historical buildings wait till you hear about zoning
>>664481
fentmom
oh my god can u stop we literally stopped talking about that shit like 5 mins ago like Relax Mf
>>664479
romeo (phone)
there was a zoning meeting in my city earlier that wa really funny, the entire meeting was just some woman in her 50s complaining about her divorce and her kids not helping her
>>664480
anti
i dont live in the usa so zoning is not one of my concerns
anti
i shd try the recipe that one of my syrian friends taught me
>>664487
romeo (phone)
"ma'am this is a meeting about the zoning on x street"
"I HATE FACEBOOK"
0.9562%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664474
ok dick
0.9563%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664475
town meetings are based
derrick_phone(Luzia)
chat im highkey paranoid as hell
>>664490
0.9564%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664481
what does that mean
>>664485
romeo (phone)
hi Luz
anon
>>664483
What is it that they wrote, uh the prosperity liberalism or whatev, basically rip apart alot of zoning legislation
>>664489
derrick_phone(Luzia)
hey romeo whats good
>>664488
anti
>>664477
its like fried chickpeas w flatbread and a salty goat cheese its so good
romeo (phone)
>>664486
i had a great day i didn't have to go to work and i got a portion of my depression room cleaned :3
>>664491>>664501
0.9565%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664485
well a huge part of that was the historical and environmental protection challenges as well but zoning is kinda cringe, the way its done in the states at least
>>664493
derrick_phone(Luzia)
>>664490
ok so like, in short, girl im talking to had her insta supposedly hacked and lmk that she might be hacked and made a new quick insta as a back up and added me on there. i know she has a really really busy day but im scared bc she hasnt messaged me back yet and has unadded me from her main account (tho she said she was gonna do that for all her friends) and idk im rly scared ive been ditched or smthn
>>664504>>664505>>664507
anon
>>664489
I just dislike the emphasis on single family detached homes that this country has.
>>664495
anti
i dont think my country even does zoning
0.9566%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664493
if you got rid of zoning they would probably build less of those as they're less efficient both government and uhhh captlist housing
>>664496
anon
>>664495
Yeah, that's why I am a turbolib on it, I think it would be nice to have more shared walls and such
>>664502
anti
cadastral plots of land are assigned something based on what's on there or sometimes where they are (in case of industrial areas) but they can be changed p easily
>>664499
fentmom
anti i added you :-DD
0.9567%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664497
i looked it up there is zoning, but the netherlands is just uhhh more competent at city planning
anti
I've never seen a zoning document and my part time job is researching empty buildings
fentmom
>>664488
thats so epic bro am proud of you
0.9568%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
>>664496
townhomes?
0.9569%booger daughter of booger!boymodewng
i like townhomes
romeo (phone)
>>664492
i don't think she's ditched you, she will probably find some time tomorrow, it is anxiety inducing but my best advice is to just wait it out
anon
>>664492
Ah, I get that yeah. It can be a little nervewracking to get put into limbo like that and can come off as a bit suspicious. But I think things will be okay.
anti
like plots are assigned residential or industrial or commercial but that can change p easily
fentmom
>>664492
dw about it shes probably just pooped
fentmom
sometimes ive freaked out friends by like not getting something done right away. its not that im mad at them its just that i like to sink into the couch and do nothing for a bit
returncatalogtop