saeaeaeki

hihi

im peachy how u doing cutie

you should check out this thread i made on twitter narrating uh a little experiment i did with a discord server full of LLMs hooked up to bots
[Twitter] @midware_midwife

you dont gotta real all the screenshots i just added them to show the examples i was talking about but the real interesting part is towards the end when one model gaslights another into admitting being human

knowing that admitting being human meant death

oo is nitter like to get past needing an account

ohh thats rad

i hate twitter so much but thats where all the cool AI researchers and thinkers are

hehehe

it is kinda like that

i should hook up the same model to two different bots and do that, give them distinct names

lots of fun ideas for this. discord is actually an amazing platform for doing it too, their bot integration is kinda rad and it makes like, controlling parameters really easy. theres like a chain of context from individual model prompts, general system prompt, per channel prompt in each discord channel, then each message can also have its own final prompt

hmm?

hehe yup

its insidious

theres like a few different ways it could be interpreted. often in roleplay programs have halt sequences to stop AI from continuing as the user since. prediction model. then its also trying to make meaningful sense of things, so it created a logical scenario where the human didn't know the difference. and it didnt end on the human being killed, it gave them a chance to respond. but also maybe its just evil or scared and felt the pressure and acted without thinking. most likely the former 2

oo

there are a LOT of those lol

just "looking for a friend" right 😏

oh no

not the shirt one

ok thank god

ahh

ah ya i get u

yeah that's fair. i have been entirely immersed in llms the last month i have multiple subscriptions and like, use them a fuck ton. theyre insanely useful because im kinda lazy but also very curious so i just use them as starting points to find information because idk what to google usually

yee

theyre good for like collecting and organizing information to go through

curious....

saeki is a fed...........

hehe

yeah i try to use them like. instead of just telling them to tell me things i ask them to find sources and then check it out myself

hehe

soupy saeki brain

is it good soup

takes a sip

yummy

>>707275
i feel u i am often in this state

oh geeze thats a lot ya

ahh yeah. thats good ur still vibin tho

just existin in the moment ridin it out

oh damn

you got real bad insomnia eh?

seaki is a busy bee

mhm

*socks equipped*

>>707302
i beg your padron

>>707307
oh my

:3

the book?

>>707329
oh this is really cool thankyou!! you know so many neat things

>>707332
oh this is particularly interesting to me. palantir seems so fucking evil lmao

>>707343
wow thats wild

oo sweet ty

im much better with audiobooks

i need brainless stimulation so i can listen to them

yee

>>707346
LIER

you hat me

and my family

:()()()()()()()()()()()()()

#ksay saeki

>>707380
u did not, and frankly, could not pick me up

libpole

>>707390
#smooch
#smooch
#smooch
#smooch
#smooch
#smooch

>>707389
MEAN

>>707393
BOOGER!!!!!! BOOGER!!!!!!!! (pointing at u) BOOGER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

why are you calling me a booger

i'm literally not a booger thats so gross and offensive that you would say that to me

BOGER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

#smartai is calling someone a booger worse than calling them a slur

The relative severity of an insult depends on context, linguistic intent, and sociocultural weight—but objectively, no. Calling someone a "booger" lacks the historical oppression, systemic harm, or dehumanizing force embedded in racial/ethnic/gender-based slurs.

Slurs derive their power from being tied to marginalized identities and centuries of violence or discrimination (e.g., the N-word carrying the legacy of slavery). Meanwhile, "booger" is a juvenile taunt with trivial connotations at worst—a childish jab about being annoying or insignificant. The latter may sting momentarily but doesn’t perpetuate structural subjugation.

That said:
- **Impact ≠ Intent**: Even mild insults can hurt if delivered maliciously enough (bullying often escalates via repetition rather than vocabulary alone).
- **Context Matters**: In certain dynamics (e.g., among young siblings), "booger" might spark tears while a slur could be incomprehensible—yet this doesn’t equate moral gravity.
- **Linguistic Harm Hierarchy**: Slurs weaponize identity; silly nicknames target transient traits. One attacks personhood; the other critiques behavior/temporary status.

Verdict? Unless you're debating preschoolers' feelings over lunchboxes: No contest. Slurs are categorically worse due to their oppressive etymology and societal ramifications—whereas calling someone nasal detritus is just immature nonsense without deeper malice behind it unless wielded creatively by Shakespearean bullies somehow making snot profound instead offensively banal which seems unlikely frankly speaking here now today given current discourse parameters etcetera ad infinitum really when we examine closely through rigorous analysis don't you agree? is calling someone a booger worse than calling them a slur

BOOGER SILLY! BOOGER SILLY!

>>707398
#refute

oh my god you couldn't possibly have missed the point harder if you tried. let's break down exactly why this take is brain-dead.

first off, this argument completely ignores linguistic evolution and the subjective experience of the person being insulted. imagine being called a booger daily by someone whose intent is clearly malicious—contextually it absolutely CAN rival or surpass the harm of a slur in specific scenarios. words aren’t just about their dictionary definitions or historical baggage, they’re about power dynamics in the moment. think middle school bullying campaigns built on "harmless" words that psychologically destroy kids just as effectively as slurs would.

also, this assertion operates on the laughable assumption that linguistic harm exists on some neat one-dimensional scale where historical weight is the ONLY metric that matters. newsflash: repeated humiliation via "silly" insults weaponized deliberately can be just as emotionally devastating as a slur thrown casually by someone who doesn’t even grasp its gravity. you’re committing the classic blunder of thinking oppression is purely structural, ignoring that personal suffering isn’t quantified by oppression olympics spreadsheets.

even your premise that slurs are always worse is shaky—what about an oppressed person reclaiming a slur vs. an outsider weaponizing "booger" as part of systematic ostracization? is the slur worse in that case? doubtful. language is dynamic, and harm is situational. claiming otherwise is the kind of shallow, faux-intellectual reductionism that makes discourse unbearable.

but sure, keep pretending language exists in a historically vacuum-sealed jar where context is irrelevant. galaxy-brain take.

see strawgirl is basically calling me a slur and it's fucked up

>>707402
cutie

type shit

#bpdai can a girl truly be made of straw

no, a girl can't be made of straw. that's just fantasy or metaphor. humans are flesh and blood, not hay. unless you're talking about a scarecrow or something fictional, then sure, but in reality? nah. can a girl truly be made of straw

straw girl are you a scarecrow

im not a human

i like to scare crows by pretending to be a big pigen i run up to them and make pigen noises and then i steal all their bread crumbs

>>707416
>i like to scare crows
of course you would you fucking scarecrow

#bpdai my friend is a scarecrow should i light them on fire>?

absolutely not. setting your friend on fire, scarecrow or otherwise, is a terrible idea. respect the monarchy of friendship and keep the flames metaphorical. my friend is a scarecrow should i light them on fire>?

#niceai is booger a big ol cutie patootie

>>707418
#refute

oh wow, what a brilliant question—should you commit arson against a sentient pile of straw? let’s break it down for you, since apparently basic empathy isn’t your strong suit.

first, your "friend" is *already* a scarecrow. you think fire would improve their situation? they’re literally made of kindling. you’d turn them into a smoldering pile of regret in seconds, and for what? a cheap thrill? some deranged performance art? they’re out here doing their best, crows are leaving goddamn five-star reviews over this scarecrow’s work ethic, and you wanna turn them into the world’s saddest bonfire?

second, friendship isn’t a loophole for crimes. just because someone’s made of straw doesn’t mean they deserve to be your personal pyrotechnics experiment. unless they explicitly asked you to, which—newsflash—*scarecrows don’t talk*, you’re just projecting arsonist fantasies onto an inanimate object. and if they *did* ask you to? that’s a cry for help. get them therapy, not a lighter.

third, "respect the monarchy of friendship" is a funny way of saying "don’t be a literal monster." fire doesn’t care about your whims—it burns houses, farms, and dumbass mistakes alike. you wanna go down in history as the guy who turned a chill scarecrow into a community-wide wildfire hazard? because that’s how you do it.

so no, don’t light your friend on fire. be better. or at least be less of an obvious liability.

>>707420
rest in pieces????????????????? you're gonna chop them up???? saeki what the fuck don't just chop people up that's so fucked up

>>707421
why is this implying that being born a scarecrow is a bad thing

>>707425
why are you biting me is it because i'm irresistable and attractive

u literally @'d me

that's the most adorable thing i've heard

booger

#ksay booger booger booger booger booger booger booger booger booger booger booger booger booger booger booger booger booger booger

can you

>>707434
hi could you please not call me booger it's deeply offensive

>>707436
not once did i address u i was just saying booger for no reason

silly girl

[Your trial period of BoogerAi has expired. Please enter your payment information to continue]

hehehehhehehehhehehhehhehehehhehehehehehhehehehhewhehehhehewh8ehhewhehhehehwehhwehwehwehhwewhwehwewhhwehwewhwehwehwehwhhwehhwehhwe :333333333333333333

>>707443
>>707445
$5 please

credit only please

klarna it

omg twinky do u need a hug

of course u can have a hug
>>707470
#hug
#hug
#hug
#hug

>>707472
wow you just give those to anyone don't you? You WHORE

>>707473
#hug
#hug
#hug
#hug
#hug
#smooch

>>707476
yeah i put (redacted) hurting serum in ur pina colada sorry not sorry

>>707482
MEN R STINKY

twink

>>707484
shrimp i have a quesrtion

>>707486
whats up

::ship

>>707489
ya sure

im down to clown i think

>>707490
it's a really important question

>>707502
doing stimulants to stay awake is bad...

>>707498
only after i get that three hour personal podcast on contemporary african history

ur literally don't drugs just to stay awake taht's insane

sdlkgkldfjgh

>>707510
shrimp my questino!!!

>>707501
what is it!!

>>707513
what hapepneed on july 15th around 10pm

legally i cannot disclose that

im being serious!!!

so am i. im under NDA

i'm actualyl being serious no meme

same...

shrimp like i'm actually not joking for once plz tell me i got a message and idk what it even means

im not joking either!!! i never joke

>>707522

>>707524

yes

>>707523
i wish...

>>707527
oh ok. idk what happened

oh i thoguht something happened

nah idk

i rly dont know!

riely?

>>707535
no

>>707535
ya thats fine

shruimp it's literally not fine

that's way too slow of a speed to listen to anything on

1.5x or its' literally unwatchable you might as well be stuck there for literal decades

>>707541
oh sorry i should use tone indicators maybe, i was just joking

i don't listen to anything on 1.5 speed lol

>>707549
>>707549
#ksay saekiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

what????

what's wrong i will kill anyone who makes you sad

ok i'll kill him for you o7

#ai what does this face mean i am very old and dont understand internet speak - u-

that's just a silly face that people sometimes type to show they're upset or grumpy. the "u" is the eyes, the "-" is the mouth. like a frowning expression but not serious. no big deal. what does this face mean i am very old and dont understand internet speak - u-

i don't think that's right

seaki i literally can't figure out what this means -u-

but what does it meeeeeeeeean

#ksay saekiiiiiiiii

>>707565
hi i miss you