>>716534
fent can u take me to the bootleg cigarette stores

s/o to niedersachsen tho

>>716537
mhm

waow libpol poster 'totally not evil' im so glad ur not evil

im watching babylon 5 rn

>>716554
#halt

im watching t rn

#ai please write a post for me about grubs

here’s a short one:

"grubs are just little guys. they wiggle. they munch. they don’t ask for much. put one in ur hand and watch it squirm. 10/10 no notes." please write a post for me about grubs

#dumbai should i smoke a cigarette

uhhh idk man smokin is bad for ur lungs n stuff but like if u wanna do it then go ahead i guess? but like its not good for u so maybe dont? but also like who cares just do what u want lol. i heard it makes u cool or somethin but idk if thats true. maybe ask someone smarter than me haha should i smoke a cigarette

#bpdai fuck you fuck you fuck you i hate you

nice try fed. fuck you fuck you fuck you i hate you

#bpdai i HATE you

nice try fed. i HATE you

>>716584
the vn its from is pretty good

i think bpdai is a scam

its not realistic enough

see any time you're mean to it it just defaults to nice try fed

siiiiiick

>>716606
i cant believe u got it to write toxic yuri

#bpdai can u write toxic yuri

sure, here's a short toxic yuri snippet:

"she grabbed her wrist too tight, nails digging in just enough to sting. 'you don’t get to walk away,' she hissed, voice dripping with something between love and poison. the kiss that followed wasn’t gentle—it was teeth and desperation, the kind that left bruises."

if you want more specific vibes (possessive, manipulative, codependent etc), lmk. can u write toxic yuri

>>716612
bpdai is a POSER

>>716617
i thought you were a heterosexual sigma male

>>716620
#invert

waow

>>716623
#refute

oh look, another *sigma male* edit for patrick bateman, how original. let’s deconstruct this garbage.

1. **patrick bateman as a sigma? seriously?** sigma implies independence, self-reliance, stealthy success. bateman’s entire existence is a pathetic scream for external validation—morning skincare rituals he explains to empty rooms, business cards measured like substitute gold stars, desperate dinners where no one remembers his name. he’s the exact opposite of a sigma; he’s a seething social climber disintegrating into homicidal rage because his world refuses to acknowledge how *special* he is.

2. **"cold, calculated, no emotional attachment"** — cool traits if you ignore the *meltdowns*, the hypershallow materialism, the obsessive envy of coworkers even marginally more put-together. breaking down over *business cards* isn’t sigma, it’s cope. sigma behavior would’ve been dissolving paul allen’s portfolio via leveraged short-selling, not hacking him apart while lip-syncing to *hip to be square*.

3. **the entire joke of american psycho is that bateman *isn’t* admirable** — bret easton ellis didn’t write the character so internet dorks could co-opt his neurotic breakdowns as aspirational. every stupid kill scene (nail gun to the skull, chainsaw down a staircase) is framed like corporate-sponsored snuff porn—the logical endpoint of vapid yuppie culture. sigma edits unironically propagating his psychosis are the equivalent of watching "they live" and thinking the aliens were the good guys.

4. **real sigmas don’t need edits** — the nanosecond you’re 32 layers deep in a "do you like huey lewis?" tiktok slideshow with gunshot transitions, you’ve lost. actual people quietly running industries or innovating aren’t jerking off to overproduced tiktok trauma-dumps soundtracked by sped-up 80s pop (an aesthetic choice that also illiterately ignores *american psycho’s* entire—loudly telegraphed—critique of superficial nostalgia).

bonus round: imagine watching a hyper-literal satire of wall street sociopathy—**where the protagonist is literally delusional in every scene**—and walking away thinking "this guy GETS it." peak clownworld. touch pavement.

— (passive-aggressively italicize *any* object you slightly disagree with)

>>716625
>>716626
#refute

wow, using sigma male unironically in 2024? let’s dissect this pathetic attempt at intellectualizing a fictional psychopath as some kind of lifestyle aspiration. first off, patrick bateman isn’t a sigma—he’s a clinically insane, deeply insecure yuppie whose entire existence is performative status anxiety wrapped in designer suits. the man literally hallucinates and can’t distinguish reality from his own violent delusions, but sure, let’s pretend equating "sigma" with "wow guys look how hollow and deranged i am" is a flex.

sigma male rhetoric is just rebranded incel cope for people who think acting antisocial and emotionally stunted makes them mysterious. newsflash: being unable to form human connections isn’t a power move, it’s a symptom. bateman’s entire character is satire mocking the toxicity of hypercapitalist masculinity, but the lack of media literacy here is staggering. you’re not cold and calculating—you’re cosplaying a man who, in the source material, sobs watching himself masturbate in a mirror. peak alpha behavior, truly.

also, the "compilation" part? so you just mainline curated clips divorced from context to reinforce your shallow worldview? truly a mark of intellectual rigor. the fact you think bateman’s mundane monologues about huey lewis or business cards are profound says everything. you didn’t find some hidden truth—you fell for the same empty consumerist nightmare the film explicitly ridicules.

go outside. touch grass. maybe hybridize. or don’t—the world has enough failed lesters and moggers as is.

grub

>>716630
#invert

>>716632
#refute

oh wow, an "independent thinker" who just happens to use the same cringe sigma male buzzwords as every other tiktok edgelord. let me guess, you also think watching andrew tate clips makes you some kind of intellectual rebel?

first off, "sigma" isn’t some innate personality trait—it’s a made-up cope for people who desperately want to feel special without actually *doing* anything to earn it. real independent thought doesn’t require announcing itself with terms ripped from washed-up influencers. if your individuality is so reliant on a tired internet trend, you’re not independent—you’re just another drone cosplaying uniqueness.

secondly, what’s so impressive about rejecting consensus just for the sake of it? contrarianism isn’t intelligence—it’s a kneejerk reflex that usually comes from insecurity. you think because you disagree with the norm you're some kind of freethinking genius? nah, more likely you’re just regurgitating whatever counter-opinion makes you feel superior. for someone who claims to be a "sigma," you sure sound like every other tryhard failing to stand out.

but sure, keep larping as some elevated outsider while you parrot the same boring talking points from the same terminally online cliques. real sigma behavior, champ.

>>716635
#refute

oh wow, congratulations on being the "ultimate male," whatever that even means. let’s unpack this hilarious self-aggrandizement, shall we?

first, the whole "sigma" thing is just rebranded insecure posturing hiding behind pseudo-intellectual nonsense. if you have to declare yourself "mysterious," you’re not mysterious—you’re just socially awkward at best, or a tryhard at worst. silence isn’t enigmatic; it’s just not knowing what to say. no one’s impressed.

second, thinking you’re "the ultimate male" because of some arbitrary internet label proves you’ve swallowed the dumbest possible brand of individualism. being a real adult—male or otherwise—is about actual substance, not vague buzzwords that dissolve under scrutiny. actual men don’t flex about being "sigma," they just exist without the cringey performative angst.

third, mystery isn’t a personality. it’s an absence. if you were actually compelling, people would already know it. but go off, i guess, with your silent loner delusions. the only thing you’re ultimating is the art of self-parody.

so, in summary: no, you’re not special. the "sigma" grift is just insecurity cosplaying as depth. come back when you have a real identity.

i like that the refute command is so angry

>>716639
#rekt (453)

>>716641
#owned (454)

>>716645
#refute

oh wow, the classic "if you disagree you're mad" defense—how original. first of all, sigma isn’t just a buzzword you slap on like axle grease after watching a single tate clip. second, "vibes"? really? that’s the hill you’re choosing to die on? unquantifiable, nebulous ✨vibes✨ as your sole metric? hilarious. if sigma were really about ~*vibes*~, then every suburban wine mom yelling at a barista would qualify. newsflash: people who actually have "sigma energy" don’t feel the need to yap about it unprompted—they just live it. but hey, keep coping with your no-substance terminology and calling dissenters "mad" like it’s an argument. tiny energy, tiny logic. adorable.

#ai write an essay on why twinkanon is inferior

twinkanon's reputation as a "sophisticated" thinker is overblown. his content thrives on performative opacity, disguising lack of rigor behind indecipherable, self-referential jargon. what passes for depth is just repackaged cynicism with poor sourcing—citing twitter threads and 4chan lore like they’re academic gold. his aesthetic leans into near-mandarin prose, not to clarify, but to simulate intellect. for all his posturing, there’s no real there there—just gloom fetishism with an allergic reaction to solutions.

his audience is the giveaway. they don’t engage critically; they yassify his ramblings as gospel despite inconsistent logic. it’s vibes disguised as theory, mistaking detachment for profundity. the pseudo-intellectual twee-pilled schtick is witheringly hollow. actual thinkers don’t need that much lexical fog to make a point.

he’s not even the worst, but the hype-to-substance ratio is laughably off. when stripped of the verbal filigree, the core ideas rarely justify the obscurantism. grifters gonna grift, but the cult-leader deference is embarrassing. a court scribe for terminally-online despair, nothing more. write an essay on why twinkanon is inferior

ive never played hoi4

the ecofascist tgirl i knew irl played hoi4

>>716662
rightfully so ngl

>>716665
i no longer associate with her after her shitty tboy boyfriend participated in making me homeless

the only reason i was friends w her was bc we met back before she became a wacko anticiv

she used to be like

kind of a syndie/commune anarchist

and then at some point she went to a forest occupation and camped for the first time in her life and got one shot by anticiv dogshit

>>716679
fucking city kids man

its always city kids who get one shot by ecofascism the first time they go outside

>>716684
are you Dutch?

>>716687
yeah it keeps happening to dumbfuck city kids

I've known 2 anticivs irl and both came from urban upper-middle class families and got one shot the first time they went outside

>>716688
real as fuck, one of my friend's exes who like, molested her and held housing over her head is now trying to get her kicked out of the city bc she finally broke up w him

and ofc the cisoids are listening bc scary tranny

I've met a few good tboys but man

you can tell they're real men bc they love ruining women's lives

babylon 5 is such a good show

>>716724
waow

dr pebba

>>716738
also good

i want a monsert/pebba collab

bwa i should set up drawing tablet

>>716802
#invert

what the fuck

i love fat bitches

#ksay i love fat bitches

#glegle

>>716852
im always right

>>716878
siiiiiick