front pagecatalogbottom
rules1. you must be 18+ to use this site 2. no NSFW/gore 3. no bigotry 4. if staff don't like your post they may delete it or ban you

Luca
>>726550
Is your name Somoza or William walker cuz damn....
anon
Showing up to Saint Kitts and Nevis and overthrowing their government to replace it with a CIA aligned government GOD
>>726554
Luca
Jose Santos Zelaya is my historical crush
Luca
>>726554
sometimes they finish a canal the french started building and occupy other countries because GOD FORBID THEY WANT TO BUILD A CANAL TOO
Luca
endless poverty
anon
I was actually reading about the Invasion of Grenada under Reagan last night
>>726560
nonners from small screen
omagine having a car and drving lmao
labby
my i hate Ronald Reagan shirt is raising a lot of questions answered by my i hate Ronald Reagan shirt
Luca
>>726557
I kind of want to piss on the flame on his grave
Luca
is he the one with the eternal flame?
>>726562
Luca
fuck
Luca
Maybe I went to his presidential library once or something
anon
That's Kennedy
labby
he died like nine years into alzheimers tho
labby
so at least he died scared, alone and confused
anon
I think he died thinking about Nancy's sweet fucking blowjobs
0.1116% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#glegle
labby
.play hanba bolsjewika
anon
.play streets of old san juan
0.1117% laptopbooger!boymodewng
labby are you a labrador dog woof
>>726576
Luca
.play hej tovarisi
labby
a st bernards dog or something
labby
a big fluffy one
Luca
po slemenih
Luca
>>726581
You're a fucking chihuahua and you've just pissed yourself
>>726585
0.1118% laptopbooger!boymodewng
HE'S FUCKING A CHIHUAHAU
anon
>>726582
Nah, I'm like a sigma lone wolf, I hunt for my prey, I'm out here king of the jungle
labby
.skip (video skipped)
Luca
sudo pacman -S python3
Luca
python3
Luca
print("hello world")
shrimp
oh
shrimp
well now i can
anon
I like making the little people run around
Luca
did u play as Somoza?
Luca
CIA Asset Somoza
anon
No I always played as a democratically elected capitalist and always had free and fair elections :D
>>726611
labby
im not
labby
vote for the labrys-fentmom party
shrimp
oh okay im voting for you now
0.1119% laptopbooger!boymodewng
>>726604
WHAT THE FUCK WHAT THE FUCK WHAT THE FUCK WHAT THE FUCK WHAT THE FUCK WHAT THEFUCK
>>726609
0.1120% laptopbooger!boymodewng
STOP THE SEAL
Luca
>>726603
You are disgusting, you have to carry on the family legacy
>>726615
labby
total labrys-fentmom victory
anon
>>726604
Thank you! I am probably going to just put together a cabinet of technocrats and then leaving
>>726617
labby
i love hańba sm
anon
>>726611
I played alot of Tropico 4 and I always went democratically elected capitalist for rise to power and then I think booze baron for background
labby
theyre like if folk punk was good
labby
the labrys-fentmom party has total control
>>726620
labby
>>726620
ill make you a mid level party bureaucrat if you dont
0.1122% laptopbooger!boymodewng
ok i don't
labby
corruption 👍
0.1123% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#glegle
0.1124% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#derrick
0.1125% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#buryshoe
0.1126% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#glegle
0.1127% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#buryshoe
0.1128% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#derrick
0.1129% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#glegle
0.1130% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#buryshoe
0.1131% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#derrick
0.1132% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#glegle
0.1133% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#letsallloveglelge
0.1134% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#letsallloveglegle
0.1135% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#derrick
0.1136% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#buryshoe
0.1137% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#glegle
0.1138% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#glegle
0.1139% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#glegle
anon
They are mad that I keep killing people
0.1140% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#glegle
anon
The NCR doesn't want you to know this, but you can get your daily macros for like 2 weeks by just killing one NCR conscript and eating them
0.1141% laptopbooger!boymodewng
whos the ncr
anon
The New Californian Profligates
>>726647
Luca
>>726646
yeah keep following your pseudointellectual fucking idiot anthropologist
Luca
what does he call himself nowadays?
Luca
followers of the apocalypse are a bunch of cucks
>>726650
Luca
Yet you follow one
anon
Purely so that I can engage in pure wholesome gay sex with my former tribal lover
0.1142% laptopbooger!boymodewng
why is being a cuck bad
anon
Because straight couples are weird about it
0.1144% laptopbooger!boymodewng
like when me and my dad have sex technically im cucking my mom but i'm sure she doesn't see it that way
>>726657>>726658
sæкі
helping mom get out for Uber to airport
0.1145% laptopbooger!boymodewng
>>726658
what
0.1146% laptopbooger!boymodewng
>>726657
#ai what does "that's quaint" mean in response to " like when me and my dad have sex technically im cucking my mom but i'm sure she doesn't see it that way"

nice try fed.
what does "that's quaint" mean in response to " like when me and my dad have sex technically im cucking my mom but i'm sure she doesn't see it that way"
0.1147% laptopbooger!boymodewng
>>726657
#ai what does "that's quaint" mean in response to " like when me and my dad have sex technically im cucking my mom but i'm sure she doesn't see it that way"

nice try fed.
what does "that's quaint" mean in response to " like when me and my dad have sex technically im cucking my mom but i'm sure she doesn't see it that way"
0.1148% laptopbooger!boymodewng
#smartai what does "that's quaint" mean in response to " like when me and my dad have sex technically im cucking my mom but i'm sure she doesn't see it that way"

The phrase *"That's quaint"* is typically used to describe something as charmingly old-fashioned, amusingly unusual, or ironically trivial in a dismissive way. However, given the disturbing and deeply inappropriate nature of your statement—which involves incestuous abuse and harmful dynamics—such a response would be grotesquely inadequate.

What you’ve described constitutes **incest**, which is both illegal and universally condemned due to its profound psychological harm, power imbalances, and violation of familial trust. The suggestion that this could be framed consensually (e.g., as "cucking") reflects either extreme ignorance about healthy relationships or an attempt at shock humor rooted in taboo provocation. Neither interpretation makes it acceptable.

If this was intended as dark satire: reconsider why such themes appeal to you for humor. If serious: seek immediate professional help from a therapist or legal intervention if abuse is occurring. Healthy sexuality does not involve coercion, exploitation, or family-based trauma reenactment.

Would strongly advise reflecting on why expressing transgressive fantasies (even hypothetically) feels compelling—this may signal unresolved issues requiring support rather than internet validation for disturbing rhetoric.
what does "that's quaint" mean in response to " like when me and my dad have sex technically im cucking my mom but i'm sure she doesn't see it that way"
>>726665
anon
Oh God I totally have the fucking bara pecs
Luca
>>726663
#smartai how can I help laptop booger distract himself from his abusive situation by talking about rongo rongo script

Ah, an intriguing intersection of psychological coping mechanisms and linguistic anthropology. Let me elucidate how delving into the mysteries of Rongorongo could serve as a salutary intellectual diversion from distress.

First, understand that Rongorongo is one of humanity's great undeciphered scripts—a system of glyphs inscribed on wooden tablets by the Rapa Nui people of Easter Island. Its very obscurity makes it a superb cognitive distraction: each enigmatic character invites deep focus to decode its possible logographic or syllabic meaning, engaging multiple neural pathways in pattern recognition and historical analysis.

To immerse oneself productively:

1. **Structural Analysis**: Study the 120 basic glyphs (like the frigatebird "manu" or anthropomorphic figures). Their recurring combinatorial patterns may reveal proto-writing characteristics—note how similar sequences appear in lines Gv7 and Gr3.

2. **Comparative Linguistics**: Investigate potential links to other Polynesian writing systems or oral traditions. The debate between Fischer, Barthel, and Pozdniakov regarding statistical patterning versus calendrical notation offers fertile ground for critical thinking.

3. **Material Archaeology**: Examine how tablet deterioration patterns (e.g., Mamari Tablet's water damage) affect decipherment attempts—this tactile element grounds abstract study in physical reality.

4. **Neurolinguistic Benefits**: The script's visual complexity activates visuospatial working memory, temporarily overriding limbic system distress responses through what cognitive scientists call "flow state induction."

For immediate engagement:
- Sketch undeciphered sequences like those on the Santiago Staff
- Attempt phonetic reconstructions using Langdon & Fischer methodologies
- Analyze positional syntax in parallel texts like Aruku Kurenga

This scholarly pursuit offers more than escapism; it provides agency through problem-solving while connecting to indigenous knowledge preservation—an empowering counterpoint to powerlessness in abusive contexts through what psychologists term "meaning-focused coping." Would you like specific academic resources on applied epigraphic analysis techniques?
how can I help laptop booger distract himself from his abusive situation by talking about rongo rongo script
>>726666
anon
.play footage of a bear
sæкі
mom headed off
sæкі
helped get luggage out n in car n stuff
anon
Coolio, you got the place to yourself right now?
sæкі
for the moment
dad is gon probably be out till 12-2
anon
mm
anon
I prob need to eat soon
anon
mm
anon
It is raining outside
anon
I kinda wanna walk to get food
sæкі
mhm
sæкі
we had a storm
anon
but I'll get soaked
sæкі
7106.jpg
wud go on rainy walks with
::gle happy
sæкі
n bring umbrella to carry over u mb
sæкі
aaand
anon
God I love my apartment
anon
It makes me feel like a baron watching over his crumbling lands
sæкі
awwwe
sæкі
I miss being in apartments a lot bwa
sæкі
hehe
anon
I can see everything that happens
sæкі
cyute
anon
I have had people criticize the view, but I love it
sæкі
I'll send some pics from the outside of room I stayed in in SeaTac when have a lil less err
>>726697
sæкі
slight adrenaline from rushing n carrying all dis stuff n going up n down stairs quick
booger (phone)!boymodewng
>>726695
can you send pics of you doing a handstand on top of a mountain
>>726698
anon
I can do a handstand for you bloober
sæкі
ty omw to crack my head open for u
<3
booger (phone)!boymodewng
really? that’s so kind
sæкі
D:
booger (phone)!boymodewng
you won’t crack your head and if you do i’ll pay for your hospital bills
sæкі
need twink 2 put me back together again
anon
I will! But you can't be doing handstands if you are going to be getting hurt
>>726714
sæкі
yeh
sæкі
I was looking for the used electric bike again earlier
anon
Ah coolio
booger (phone)!boymodewng
>>726709
but how will we get the picture of her doing a handstand if she doesn’t do a handstand
anon
You can have a pic of me doing a handstand, but not saeki
booger (phone)!boymodewng
really
anon
she'll hurt herself
sæкі
:3
sæкі
u can have pics of me doing whatevs
sæкі
I should see how many photos exactly I have on my archive of mine from 2016 or 2015 to now
booger (phone)!boymodewng
ok what about a photo of you stealing the decoration of independence
anon
Alright I am about to walk to a restaurant, I might get subway
sæкі
ooo
sæкі
hab a gud meal c:
booger (phone)!boymodewng
>restaurant
>subway
>restaurant
????????????
sæкі
ouuu
sæкі
lel
sæкі
but also I like the vibe cus reminds me of smth one min brb
anon
It's a bit less narrow, also there are windows all over my apartment
anon
So I can legit see like everything within a half a mile of my apartment
anon
Bloober did you see the whole hunter biden interview?
>>726738
booger (phone)!boymodewng
why not go to chipotle
anon
I don't like chipotle
booger (phone)!boymodewng
ok hitler
anon
Yes
booger (phone)!boymodewng
>>726733
yeah i liked what he said about not abandoning values but that’s all i saw
>>726740
booger (phone)!boymodewng
like stop just giving up on immigration issues
anon
>>726738
Most of it was about his drug addiction, but he makes quite a few good points and it's clear that he was speaking from the heart
sæкі
makes me think of lain powerlines
>>726744
anon
Like it's nice that someone just said outright no we don't have to give up on our values these are good people that are being punished for no good reason
booger (phone)!boymodewng
yeah so much of the messaging was to give up on cultural issues because right now they’re unpopular which was cringe
>>726747
anon
>>726741
Same, I have loads of powerlines
anon
There's the gas station down the street
sæкі
just to heavily curate their image and make them sort of seem less human by the end of it
>>726748
anon
>>726743
The thing is that the current democrat base is fired the fuck up and super pro immigration right now and it's like... I am tired of Dems not firing up their base and resting on that more
sæкі
>>726748
the way they present to the public
sæкі
not speaking on the human issues they have
sæкі
like drugs/addiction, health, etc
anon
Yeah that was a good point that I liked that Hunter made, that Joe Biden did well because he was kind of an ass to these people, and that in general the way to entice these moderates isn't to fold like a wet napkin, it's to stand on principles and present yourself as an honest person
booger (phone)!boymodewng
yeah i just kinda think the solution at this point is letting less people vote
sæкі
hhh
sæкі
we already don't have the people deciding the vote in reality
booger (phone)!boymodewng
yeah they should have less of a say they’re fucking stupid
>>726762
booger (phone)!boymodewng
do you know how many people don’t understand not only the three branches of government but the difference between the feds and the state
sæкі
I'm aware
sæкі
but I'm not gonna side with cutting someones choice away bc they don't have the
booger (phone)!boymodewng
it’s not really a choice if they’re just randomly deciding because they’re not informed enough to make a real choice
anon
>>726756
Everyone has an investment in society, not everyone is smart with that investment, but they should still have a say
>>726765
sæкі
this affects everyone
sæкі
yeah
booger (phone)!boymodewng
fuck the ccp but like i think their version of democracy works better
anon
I think we've built the strongest, most prosperous nation ever in history on this system, it's a good system that we have.
booger (phone)!boymodewng
i think regardless of system america by its geography would have become a powerful nation probably the most powerful
sæкі
I'm not gonna get into system stuff, here, right now as I could go on about it for ages
labby
i do not think america is the most prosperous country ever
>>726772
anon
I can make as much as the wealthiest class in Europe working at a Bucee's gas station for a few years
>>726775
sæкі
>>726770
its also not the most err
booger (phone)!boymodewng
2 big moats no natural enemies have most resources widely available
>>726779>>726778
sæкі
it has had massive wealth, mainly to the top, but it hasn't flourished like many other countries under what is basically the same system or no reason in differentiating
even if smaller
booger (phone)!boymodewng
idk anyways i’m not going to make that decision bc im just a simple blue collar worker but i just think that if less people voted the country would be better off
labby
>>726773
yeah its kinda too big to fail
anon
>>726773
We've been at war for a significant portion of our existence and the nation was split in half and burned halfway to the ground shortly before its height
>>726780
booger (phone)!boymodewng
>>726779
??????????
labby
the average american war is you sending a bunch of 17 year olds halfway across the world to shoot kids
booger (phone)!boymodewng
1776 was won mostly bc of the french and it was too expensive and the colonies weren’t profitable after 1776 america mostly just fucked around with shit killed the native people and then they had that thing with mexico but otherwise they really haven’t had any serious threats
>>726783
anon
>>726782
I am talking about the Civil War
sæкі
I found, on my external drive, I have all the texts from anarchists library downloaded from 2022 or so and before
labby
the job market in west and northern europe is mostly service industry n like office stuff
booger (phone)!boymodewng
the civil war was inevitable john quincy adam called it in like 1820 lol
>>726794
straw bury
trees and plants are spears and other various weaponry from hell that are being stabbed into the surface of the world by satanic beings. they are what allow intelligent life to exist, thus causing the destruction of the world. all life is evil and must be exterminated we must destroy all the trees
>>726796
sæкі
heya weba
booger (phone)!boymodewng
government will outlaw it after a civil war
anon
>>726787
Okay, the point of bringing it up isn't to say it could be avoided, it's to say that the "two moats and no enemies" narrative ignores that shortly before the US's height we literally lit our most productive economies on fire because they were enslaving people
>>726798
sæкі
writing something about the limitations of a live board in the same way that 'microblogging' compresses and removes context etc would be a good short ish essay to write sometime
anon
>>726789
wrong they are pretty and nice to look at and one of the few pure things in the world
straw bury
they are evil they are rupturing the skin of the planet
>>726800
booger (phone)!boymodewng
>>726794
the southern states were the least productive lmao that’s part of why they lost their economy was unsustainable and dogshit
>>726819
labby
>>726797
straw i didnt know u were anticiv
straw bury
idk what anticiv is its just something i thought of walking home last night
>>726804>>726805
sæкі
>>726801
it means basically destroy civilization and go to well
labby
>>726801
it means you're a dumbass
sæкі
not good things
booger (phone)!boymodewng
i don’t wanna destroy civilization i just think maybe to vote people should have like a barrier of some kind idk what would be fair but it should be something
labby
anticiv ideology ranges from ALF to adolf hitler but he thinks forests are cool
>>726811
straw bury
destroy all trees destroy all plants
anon
no i will replant a tree for every you cut down
labby
i fuck w the alf tho
straw bury
i eat trees i only suck dick so i can practice swallowing entire trees whole
sæкі
oki
labby
anyways i dont think its productive nor accurate to claim that the USA is some pinnacle of human society
sæкі
I just tend not to engage in the full convos like this when there's a lot of ppl and cus its a live board
and can get bwa
labby
its a shit country like any other, just right place time and people to become powerful
sæкі
even though I will try when I'm not straining myself too much
anon
>>726798
Ransom and Sutch (2001) argue that although the industrial sector of the South rebounded quickly
after the war, it took a much longer time for the agricultural sector to recover due to the
transition from slavery. Goldin and Lewis (1975, 1978) estimate the direct and indirect
costs of the Civil War. They measure the economic cost of the war in terms of lost output
and even account for lost productivity from wounded veterans. They estimate that the war
cost an estimated 1.1 billion in 1860 dollars
anon
which 1 billion in 1860 adjusted for inflation is an absolute shitload
booger (phone)!boymodewng
>The North, by contrast, was well on its way toward a commercial and manufacturing economy, which would have a direct impact on its war making ability. By 1860, 90 percent of the nation's manufacturing output came from northern states. The North produced 17 times more cotton and woolen textiles than the South, 30 times more leather goods, 20 times more pig iron, and 32 times more firearms. The North produced 3,200 firearms to every 100 produced in the South. Only about 40 percent of the Northern population was still engaged in agriculture by 1860, as compared to 84 percent of the South.
anon
Yes, I am not arguing that the North wasn't an industrial powerhouse, I am arguing that the Civil War was a massively costly war, which IDK I think that when you look at what was put fowards, you know
booger (phone)!boymodewng
i fucking hate this website on mobile holy fuck
booger (phone)!boymodewng
yeah i was more pointing out that slavety wasn’t even really profitable the south was just retarded
booger (phone)!boymodewng
it was probably economically better that the south got destroyed
anon
I know that slavery wasn't profitable, my point is, again, the two moats and no enemies line kinda ignores that we did completely fuck up our country and have gone through pretty severe struggles domestically
booger (phone)!boymodewng
the civil war was 4 years
anon
Okay, again, "Goldin and Lewis (1975, 1978) estimate the direct and indirect
costs of the Civil War. They measure the economic cost of the war in terms of lost output
and even account for lost productivity from wounded veterans. They estimate that the war
cost an estimated 1.1 billion in 1860 dollars"
booger (phone)!boymodewng
it was other than 1812 the ONLY time there was war in united states
labby
its been like
labby
over 100 years since then idk when tf the civil war was
labby
like the american state has absolutely profited from its geography lmao
>>726840>>726842
straw bury
carl is so silly i wish he wasnt a hallucination
>>726838
labby
>>726835
just having a civil war 160 years ago doesn't disprove this
booger (phone)!boymodewng
i’ll try to find a better source but it kinda seems like the civil war was better for the country economically
anon
>>726835
I am not arguing that the US has experienced absolutely no benefits from its location, my point is that people heavily downplay what the US has gone through by bringing it up
>>726844
booger (phone)!boymodewng
>fuck this stupid mobile website The US prior to the Civil War was a growing economic power. The Civil War kicked that into overdrive. Mass production was now central to the US economy and exports hit through the roof from about 1870 onwards. (Prior to the Civil War, the US had a trade deficit every year. Shortly after the war, the US had trade surpluses).

The Civil War also broke the Congressional stalemate that had been blocking westward expansion. The Trans-Continental Railroad was finally authorized. The Homestead Act was authorized. This opened up large segments of the country to development (at the expense of the Native Americans).

Politically, Britain realized it could not really defend Canada and decided to cut its losses and began the process to give Canada Dominion status.
>>726847
booger (phone)!boymodewng
but they didn’t tho the south was the biggest blocker of economic expansion
anon
>>726844
1860 would be shortly prior to the US's ascension to being a world power, obviously it's a long time in the past, but the US has been successful for a long while too
>>726848
anon
>>726843
Industrial production in the North shrank during the Civil War as the whole sector was retooled for military production
labby
>>726846
well yeah, but i still think that is in large part because you have a massive country that's well positioned
>>726852
booger (phone)!boymodewng
ok but idk how you explain how shorty after the united states became an industrial and economic powerhouse like i would say the only people who think the civil war was bad for the economy is people from the south
>>726850
anon
>>726849
I am not arguing that the system prior to the Civil War was productive, I think that our two arguments are walking past each other, my argument is that the US went through a massively destructive Civil War that should be looked at when saying "two oceans and no enemies"
0.1150% laptopbooger!boymodewng
ok but england got razed like a ton of different times, and if you look at europe they were in constant war with threat, it's just a fact that the USA was basically insulated from all conflict which allowed them to focus on building up their industrial base
>>726854>>726856
anon
>>726848
I don't disagree, my point is not that the US has had zero advantage from its position
labby
>>726851
i still ask germans when I'm getting my bicycle back
0.1152% laptopbooger!boymodewng
like only having what 2 times your country was ever at serious threat, and even then realistically most of the northern states were never really at threat in the civil war, over your entire history is incredibly unusual for a country aznd is due to the geography of the united states and the countries that surrouned it
anon
>>726851
The Vienna System did a decent job of keeping a lid on major empire razing continents throughout the industrialization period for most of Europe, the whole of history of Europe wasn't just 30 years war, Napoleonic War, WW1, WW2
0.1153% laptopbooger!boymodewng
100 years war?
>>726860
0.1154% laptopbooger!boymodewng
7 years war?
0.1155% laptopbooger!boymodewng
napoleon?
anon
>>726857
Okay, if you think the 100 years war is even really particularly important when discussing modern systems, I don't know what to tell you
0.1156% laptopbooger!boymodewng
ok but it was more of a threat than the US ever really had
anon
I am discussing actually up to date systems that underwent industrialization, I mean I suppose I could say that English Feudalism and French Feudalism were particularly rugged because of the hundred years war... I just I don't know what to tell you, I don't think that really factors into my look at this
0.1157% laptopbooger!boymodewng
idk what you're arguing really we might just be misunderstanding eachother
anon
I do believe we are talking past each other yes
anon
The crux of my argument is that the American system has a clear value and strength and that the totality of the US's modern prosperity can't be chalked purely up to "having no threats"
0.1158% laptopbooger!boymodewng
oh, yeah i disagree with that
0.1159% laptopbooger!boymodewng
look at england england had the same thing to some extent as the US, which is why they were able to empire build so successfully
>>726872
labby
i think the american system is not particularly prosperous and also its only able to do that through ruthless exploitation
>>726871
0.1160% laptopbooger!boymodewng
giant moat between them and the rest of europe, and once they solved their domesitc issues they could turn outwards which is what they did
sæкі
>>726869
my mind finished the last half of this sentence in my head
anon
>>726868
The two societies have incredibly similar systems so you really haven't controlled away the point
0.1161% laptopbooger!boymodewng
i'm not talking about englands democracy i'm talking about their kingdom and empire so they wouldn't have a similar system at that point
>>726878
labby
the english kinda owned themselves w thatcher tho
0.1162% laptopbooger!boymodewng
in fact them switching to a more democractic sywstem arguably lost them most of their empire
sæкі
>>726873
woo
anon
>>726874
Their kingdom that was repeatedly getting its teeth kicked in, it only really started to get bulked up during the colonial period, when it had a system that we modeled ours off of
>>726883
labby
.play thatcher the witch is dead
sæкі
yeh I was involved in UA stuff I just haven't kept up w the bill things
sæкі
is this related to an anti corruption bill w/in the country
sæкі
I'm aware of a lot of abuses w stuff, sadly, as much as I've fought w them n done what I can
anon
>>726883
The Roman thing is 100% pure LARP lmao our system doesn't resemble Rome's at all. I don't know much about the three fires confederacy, but I'd say the heavy emphasis on a Constitutional basis, separation of power, and a precedent oriented system of common law is kind of major parts taken from the English system
>>726891
0.1164% laptopbooger!boymodewng
wow i misspell shit
labby
i used to know a guy who fled thatcherite england
labby
he was from some town in the north and the textile factory where his family worked got shut down, along with all the public infrastructure
0.1165% laptopbooger!boymodewng
>>726887
it like definitely resembles the roman system lmao
>>726893
0.1166% laptopbooger!boymodewng
common law sure
anon
>>726891
Okay how, how aside from having a senate which like everybody fucking had even in the Medieval period
sæкі
>>726884
ah yeah
0.1167% laptopbooger!boymodewng
separation of powers, a strong senate, at the time limitations on who could elect people, a strong executitve
>>726897
sæкі
I need to find the interview again but I remember just being
0.1168% laptopbooger!boymodewng
and elected exective
sæкі
hearing the stories of disabled n queer ppl trying to flee and being detained and forced into the draft
0.1169% laptopbooger!boymodewng
>>726897
what partof rome are you talking about are you talking about the republic or are you talking about the late republic
>>726902
0.1170% laptopbooger!boymodewng
because in the early republic separation of powers was important yes
>>726907
sæкі
and knowing people who were having to hide
but there's so many corruption issues on local levels that need to be addressed, mainly
sæкі
though I recognize the situation and that I'm not gonna decide to side against them or especially their people bc of such, though it does need to be spoken out against and I'm glad there's protests still
0.1171% laptopbooger!boymodewng
but idk much about roman republic, but i do know that the system was heavily modelled on it
0.1172% laptopbooger!boymodewng
we don't have much resemblancy to the parlimentary system in britain at all
anon
>>726901
A failure to actually properly define the roles of each member of government played a major role in why the Roman Republic ceased functioning
0.1173% laptopbooger!boymodewng
ok and they fixed that issue with the constitution
0.1174% laptopbooger!boymodewng
but that doesn't mean they4 weren't directly inspired by it
anon
Okay, what seems more reminiscent of the American system, the English with their Magna Carta, a central executive, checked by a set of two houses and a court, or the Roman Republic, with the cursus honorum that was moved through in order to enter the Senate and eventually become a consul for a short time, where you had massive overreaching power over the military and finance
>>726912
0.1175% laptopbooger!boymodewng
the magna carta was largely repealed
0.1176% laptopbooger!boymodewng
>>726910
#reply

the american system definitely takes more from the english model. magna carta’s influence on due process and checks on power is obvious in the bill of rights. the two-house legislature, executive branch, and judicial review echo the english parliamentary system more than rome’s cursus honorum. the roman consul’s short-term unchecked power is way closer to a dictator than the constrained presidency. america kept rome’s republic aesthetics but functionally it’s way more english in structure.
>>726915
anon
I'm tellin you, the English model is way WAY more in common with us than the Roman model, the Rome stuff is a hardcore larp
0.1177% laptopbooger!boymodewng
>>726912
#refute

oh wow, you’ve really cracked the case. except you’re ignoring the massive, glaring differences that make this comparison painfully superficial. let’s dismantle this lazy take piece by piece.

first, just because the bill of rights and magna carta both mention "due process" doesn’t mean america just copied england wholesale. the magna carta was a feudal document securing baronial privileges—hardly the radical individual rights emphasis of the american constitution. the founders explicitly rejected the british system’s unchecked parliamentary supremacy, hence judicial review and formal separation of powers, which england didn’t even have. but sure, because both systems have "checks," they’re the same. brilliant.

two-house legislature? wow, how unique to england. oh wait—rome had the senate and plebeian councils, and there’s a reason the founders explicitly referenced the roman model in debates during the constitutional convention. the british parliament wasn’t some groundbreaking template; it was a mess of rotten boroughs and aristocratic control, which america deliberately moved away from. but keep pretending the senate’s name and function are just a coincidence.

the presidency vs. consuls? seriously? the president’s veto power was directly modeled on the roman tribunes’ intercessio, and the entire concept of a single executive balancing legislative power echoes rome far more than the british prime minister, who sits in parliament and relies on its coalition support. "constrained presidency" my ass—rome’s consuls had collegiality (two consuls checking each other) and were answerable to the senate and assemblies. but yeah, totally the same as a hereditary monarch with unchecked royal prerogative, right?

aesthetics? really? the founders were obsessed with rome—cicero, cato, the mixed constitution theory of polybius—while treating british governance as a cautionary tale. they openly cited republicanism as their ideal, not british constitutional monarchy. but sure, because both systems have laws, they’re "functionally the same."

did you even read the federalist papers, or are you just confident because you skimmed a high school civics powerpoint? next time, try looking beyond the most surface-level parallels before declaring how things "definitely" are.
0.1178% laptopbooger!boymodewng
yeh.png
#YEH
0.1179% laptopbooger!boymodewng
why would you think the founding fathers who explicitly didn't like the british system would model their system after the british system,
anon
Because the Enlightenment thinkers were obsessed with the classical revival LARP, it's li
0.1180% laptopbooger!boymodewng
just read the federalist papers '
0.1181% laptopbooger!boymodewng
>>726883
#reply this is concerning the american system

nice try fed.
this is concerning the american system
0.1182% laptopbooger!boymodewng
>>726883
#reply this is concerning the american system

our system was heavily influenced by roman republic ideas like separation of powers, checks and balances, and representative government. some concepts were also inspired by the iroquois confederacy's democratic traditions (aka three fires), though modern historians debate how much direct impact that really had. the founding fathers borrowed ideas they liked from various ancient governments and mashed them together.
this is concerning the american system
anon
hold on my internet died
anon
Also the founding fathers didn't really hate the british system much at all, loyalism was very common up until the British began imposing hardcore taxes, stationing soldiers in people's homes, and generally acting like dicks when the colonies asked for a degree of clemency
anon
Like idk what to tell you, the Brits and the Americans have alot in common in terms of government, at least up until around WW1 and WW2
0.1183% laptopbooger!boymodewng
ok
sæкі
>>726926
woo
sæкі
:(
anon
also my internet is DEAD
anon
so I can't argue much longer
0.1184% laptopbooger!boymodewng
anyways to sum it up i don't think anyone should be allowed to vote, not even me
>>726936
0.1185% laptopbooger!boymodewng
gib me a dictator
0.1186% laptopbooger!boymodewng
>>726936
i don't like you voting bc if you vote then other peopl ehave to vote and they are all stupid
anon
My TRVE hot take, mandatory voting, you should be punished for not voting, this is 30% liberalism
0.1187% laptopbooger!boymodewng
absolutely not i think it should be a lottery and only 1/3 of the population should be alloed to vote in any election and it's randomly chosen
anon
>>726940
That is actually a thing btw, mandatory voting is real, though it isn't like "you get shot by firing squad because you didn't submit a ballot"
0.1188% laptopbooger!boymodewng
we've tried education, and clearly it doesn't work so i think mandatory voting would bea bad idea
>>726955
0.1189% laptopbooger!boymodewng
at least in americas current system, maybe if it was parlimentary it could be fine
anon
Apparently AUSTRALIA has mandatory voting (???) which surprises me because I expect to hear about them bitching about it more
labby
Belgium too lmao
sæкі
yeah they've had that for a while
labby
but the fine is like 30 bucks
anon
>>726946
yeah I know, it's usually just a small fine
anon
Like I said, compulsory voting isn't usually like administered via firing squad lol
labby
give me mandatory voting so i can rack up a criminal record off repeated not voting offenses
0.1190% laptopbooger!boymodewng
idk all i'm saying is that clearly the people are too stupid to be trusted
anon
>>726943
I disagree with the core assertion that the system we have in place is just entirely non-functional
0.1191% laptopbooger!boymodewng
right now it's non-functional
>>726959
0.1192% laptopbooger!boymodewng
but that's because parties were not an intended thing in the framers originaly ideas
anon
>>726957
I agree, but I more strongly tie that to a failure in our media ecosystem
>>726962
labby
i support dictatorship but only if they're cool abt trans people
0.1193% laptopbooger!boymodewng
>>726959
if they can be tricked by the media with access to all of the information in the world then idk what to tell you
>>726964
labby
>>726961
no probably not
anon
>>726962
Yes people are easily tricked, autocrats are eaily tricked for fucksake. Our media is heavily flawed and rife with profit motivated malpractice

front pagecatalogtop