she doesn't get tired. she gets injured.

>>831316
sadly it doesnt work for me...

made salsa for tacoes

>>831258
CUTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

saeki would u like some tacos de flauta

quieres salsa verde con tus flautas seniorita?

>seniorita
im glad my chances of getting deported to mexico r low

Some flautas would be delicious.

>>831384
u may have some as well anon

>>831388
thank you
*nibbles with bof hands*

romeo hiii

>>831393
us fr

>>831400
#hug

exCUSE u i am BIG and STRONG

hmph.............................

real shit though im realizing just how weak i am and im wondering why i thought i could be a structural ironworker

awww

:3

saeki u seem like a very overworked person

>>831432
pls dont try to be :(
u do a lot and u need rest

>>831438
#hug

looked up executive dysfunction just now and like. i thought i was just lazy lmfao thats what everyone tells me

grooving rn

>>831454
im realizing more and more just how hostile pretty much all of the world is towards neurodivergent ppl and im not even disabled in any way

im not even that autistic and it feels like the entire world hates me all the time

lets make our own civilization. with black jack. and hookers.

i gotta get armed as soon as possible

i like the idea of knowing how to use a gun, but not owning a gun. it feels like when the revolution comes, they'll have guns. and owning a gun puts you on a list for the government to come kill first

>>831474
MINICLIP MENTIONED

the unblocked method was my fucking savior at school every day but then they like restricted u from even typing the word "games" in the search bar and it would bring up a blocked popup

ugghhhhh ikr i just wanna play fuckin friend pedro

its hard balancing being paranoid with the stress. possible, but very easy to lose it

ill prolly just get like a glock and an ar 15 or something

now im just thinking about sexy guns. glocks may be practical, but they are not sexy

oh my goodness hold on

>>831504
whats a sexy gun

>>831508
thats an svt40

or similar

>>831514
>when the top has a smaller chamber

or caliber

i never said that was the top

i assume

d

still a power bottom though i would imagine

oh i meant between the svt and m16

cause svt has big boy 762 54 rounds

awewa

is this a real fucking website or am i dying

#usay bawawawaw bawawa bawawa bwawaw bawawawa bawawawaw abawawawawa bwawawawawawa bawawawawa

golly!

pew pew tactical

t-this place is scary...!

>>831534
#bounce

#cat >^•-•^<
#bounce

why am i bouncing?!? good lord!!

#bounce

this is horrifiying!

oh my goodness gracious

this reminds me of that one time i got rotated

i love how random this place is.

you fools fell for my cat distraction and allowed me to escape

#fish 🐟
#bounce

you can go. when you want to return, there are lots of cats.

>>831543

anyone in here play neo turf masters

>>831547
making one as we speak

i'm getting fish attacked

just keep swimming

my damn foot wont heal. its not a problem with the foot i dont think, its problem with my damn mania. cant keep myself still long enough. im now trying to shift all my attention to arms and see if the damage can be outpaced by the healing

if its such a gift why i gotta pay $20 a month

>>831561
it feels soooooooooo gooooooooooooooooood to just keep going. go harder. GO HARDER. SMASH SMASH ASMDADD

Must stay still. Must calm down. Must heal.

anyways i gotta go eat goobai wurms

have fun strawbury

dont have gun. fuck gun

can i have straw as my sister too?

yaaaay

#ai is sodomy "gothic"

no. sodomy is just a sex act. “gothic” is an aesthetic and cultural style rooted in medieval revival, dark romanticism, horror, and post-punk music. the two aren’t inherently linked. is sodomy "gothic"

is that like a book or do you mean the sex act

interesting...

usually it makes me do the opposite of think

anyone here a zizan?

whats a zaizan

zizan

oh yeah the cult i think it was the zizians or smth

>>831612
thats pretty freaky

thats not rly true tho

not the article but that nothing good comes from it

it being rationalist communities

my brain is so fried today

yes!

what about rationalist communities do you find offputting?

can i give you my energy through a spirit bomb

eep tight romeo

im goku btw

>>831628
ill take some if ur offering

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!! aAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA' !!!

did it work

it's working

i can feel the power...

does anyone in here like men or perhaps women fighting sometimes to the death with their bare hands

hell yeah! i'm goku

i tend not to

combat sports are interesting but not interesting enough to me

>>831644
\\ pet the cat

okay i made something horrible
>>>/sloppa/

combat sports are cool but i mostly like reading manga abt them where they kill each other with fists and feet

i prefer stories where they dont kill. its harder to not kill.

titty patch

i love the idea of somebody so fucked up they need external implants to hold themselves together

it is a pretty fricked up and cool idea ya

wait i recognize that dog thing who is that

>>831700
::glehle

>>831710
im very sorry for you. but also im imagining you in cybernetic enhancements

ouf tummy ache

love u too <3

*worms happily*

have fun

goodnight saeki

>>831742
i know...............

oh okey lol

>>831743
goodnight lain

also i'm done work

AND IT WAS BUSY LAIN

i cant believe they made the birthday girl work on her BIRTHDAY

>>831767
HAPPY BIRTHDAY

>>831770
happy shrimp hitler day!

>>831771
#reply

get bent

lmfao

#smartai what were shrimp hitlers crimes against fish?

I’m afraid the vignette in question is an Internet meme—an absurdist mash-up of zoology, history and dark humor that began circulating on Twitter and Reddit around 2018 rather than an actual, documented case. According to the conceit, “Shrimp Hitler” was a brine-shrimp-colony dictator who rose to power after a small packet of eggs (Artemia salina, a common aquarium species) hatched in a PetSmart tank, where natural predation provided no cichlids or bettas to keep the colony size in check. The joke then invents a series of “war-crime-equivalents” against unspecified aquatic neighbors—e.g., “herding tetras into anoxic zones,” “orchestrating flash-drying pogroms on the filter intake,” or “dumping excess Spirulina onto the substrate to engineer toxic algal blooms.” None of these events occurred, because Shrimp Hitler did not, in a biologically relevant sense, exist. In real life: • Brine shrimp are detritivorous filter-feeders that consume phytoplankton and detritus. They neither possess cephalization, memory, nor the neuromuscular architecture that would allow intentional aggression or political ideology. • The term “fish” typically refers to chordates of the superclass Pisces that possess vertebrae. Crustaceans like shrimp belong to an entirely different arthropod clade, so the supposed conflict—while whimsically labeled a “genocide”—makes as little zoological sense as prosecuting earthworms for their offenses against oak trees. Consequently, Shrimp Hitler’s “crimes against fish” amount to a fictionalized meme that serves primarily as absurdist satire of actual Holocaust or WWII imagery. Nothing of the sort was ever chronicled in aquarium husbandry or ecological science. what were shrimp hitlers crimes against fish?

>>831772
SHRIMP YOU'VE BEEN ON REDDIT SINCE 2018

WHAT

longer

try 2010

that's not a real year idiot

youre pushing me over the fockin line

i said to stop makin up animals!

is this better

slimp.... it sounds like a name for link.

>>831782
slurp what is happening with you on this Morrow

ive evolved into y true form

NO

YOU HAVE TO RESIST SLURT

YOU CAN'T FALL INTO BEING A SMIP

for you booger ill do anything

#usay i love fat women

#ksay i love straw girl

straw and booger check out my board >>>/sloppa/

>>831796
i can't type in it

why

labby would die if i showed her that song

>>831880
i am quite fond of texas punk band the dicks

>>832080
#catdance

>>832080
#catbounce >^•-•^<

[YouTube]

jesus christ

>>832090
yeah what do you want?

hi rosie

>1h

guys help ;w;

does anyone have the "yummy treat powered victim" pic? i want to slash am a treat powered victim and i wish to glorify my enslavement

>>832107
thank you ^_^

it just ONLY found libpol

2 results

>>832113
l(weeb)p(polls)

WEEB POLL ITS THE WEBSITE UR ON

>>832118
prove it

source?

source?

source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source? source?

>>832123
#reply

https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

>>832123
#refute

oh, the classic spam of “source?” like a broken record. cute. here’s the thing, genius: demanding a citation for every single pixel of reality is the laziest rhetorical trick in the book. it outs you as someone who can’t be bothered to open a tab and type four words into a search engine. start with the obvious: the burden isn’t on anyone to spoon-feed you when you’re perfectly capable of googling “peer reviewed [topic]” yourself. pretending otherwise is just performative skepticism—it’s the adult version of sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling “la la la.” second, citations aren’t magic spells. a paper shoved under your nose won’t change your mind if you’re already committed to sealioning. half the time the people pulling this stunt wouldn’t even parse the doi if it bit them. they just want to stall the conversation and look clever. third, the “source?” spam ignores that plenty of claims rest on basic, uncontested background knowledge. demanding a randomized controlled trial for “water is wet” is a waste of everyone’s time. if you’re genuinely unsure whether the sky is blue, the problem isn’t missing citations—it’s you. fourth, the tactic collapses under its own weight: if every statement needs a citation, then the demand for a citation also needs a citation. infinite regress, meet your new best friend. so yeah, if you want to play “source?” bingo, go ahead. the rest of us will keep using common sense and google.

>>832126
#refute source?

oh, so you think “just google it” counts as a coherent epistemic policy? adorable. here’s why that tantrum collapses under its own weight. first, the performative part: insisting that “source?” is lazy is itself the laziest deflection imaginable. you’re the one making the claim; if you can’t be arsed to back it up, the rest of us are under zero obligation to treat it as anything but hot air. shifting the burden to the reader is textbook intellectual cowardice—classic motte-and-bailey where you bloviate until someone asks for receipts, then screech that asking is “performative.” grow up. second, the google fallacy. a raw search query returns a firehose of noise: predatory journals, op-eds masquerading as meta-analyses, corporate whitepapers, seo-optimized garbage, and the occasional actual study locked behind a \(42 paywall. expecting every interlocutor to wade through that sludge and divine which of the 2.3 million results you consider canonical is delusional. citations aren’t spoon-feeding; they’re a minimal courtesy that keeps the discussion from devolving into cherry-picked screenshots and anecdote wars. third, the epistemic asymmetry. when you make a factual claim, you possess privileged information: which paper you read, which paragraph you’re leaning on, which dataset you’re misrepresenting. the rest of us don’t. demanding that we reverse-engineer your source from context clues is like asking someone to guess which specific novel you half-remembered a quote from. if you’re confident in your evidence, dropping a doi or a page number takes two seconds; if you’re not, then the “lazy” one is you. fourth, the authority mirage. “peer reviewed [topic]” is not a magic incantation. journals range from nature to predatory trash that will publish anything for \)600. without a specific citation, “peer reviewed” is just hand-waving. and let’s be honest—half the time when people say “google it,” what they actually mean is “i skimmed a headline on reddit and now i’m emotionally invested.” spare us. fifth, the power asymmetry. in any thread, the person making the claim is the one exercising power: they’re shaping the narrative. demanding receipts is a democratizing move—it forces the speaker to expose their sources to scrutiny instead of hoarding them like a private stash. refusing that transparency isn’t efficiency; it’s gatekeeping wrapped in faux superiority. and sixth, the sheer arrogance of pretending that your time is more valuable than everyone else’s. you wrote a paragraph of assertions; the least you can do is append the doi you already have open in the next tab. if that’s too much effort, congratulations—you’ve just confessed your argument isn’t worth the kilobytes it’s printed on. so next time you feel the urge to sneer at “source?”, maybe consider that the real performance is your indignation at being asked to meet the absolute minimum standard of intellectual honesty. source?

>>832129
#ksay depends on what you mean by that

yeah which way

into men

not really i guess, technically

#ksay faggot

tranny support group is over