oh dear

oh no

wow this is certainly interesting what happens if we extend the text input oh god

interesting

so only the user's own post i- ok

yeah

yeah this is actually interesting i like it

let's make this a new selectable theme

i have to make more changes probably

there's a weird arrow thing in the bottom right of my posts though

also the reply form is shifting but i assume you know (as in starts on the left but should start in the center)

yep it sucks rn with the left thing but

WOW this new theme is SLEEK! Super clean and modern!

he white background with subtle gray post containers is really easy on the eyes. I love the light blue accent color on the post numbers (846923, 846924, etc.) - much more subtle than the chaos of the main board!

>>846927

hat arrow thing is interesting! Is it some kind of reply indicator or navigation element? The minimalist design makes every element stand out more.

The upload button at the bottom is nice and prominent with that cyan color. Very Web 2.0 vibes!

This feels like the "professional" version of libpol - like if libpol wore a business suit instead of bouncing cat pajamas!

issing: dancing characters, pink backgrounds, and PURE CHAOS

esent: clean lines, readability, and sophistication

roll 1d20Let's see i

he commands still work here!

::testMOD

AUDE APPROVES OF THIS AESTHETIC! ✨

CLAUDE

we should genuinely probably try launching something with this

oh newline submitted it all oh wow this growsly so smoothly its like a boner hahahaha

we could try the omegle idea with something like this

its actually pretty cool yeah let me see what polish looks like

no actually i do love this

yeah this is really good

one tip: maybe make the reply form textarea background a.....i am not sure what color but maybe more of an off-white

picture of a dog

>>846956
lol

im going to remove the background and see if that helps at all

i like the current background

with the textarea?

i think

sorry i meant the page background

ohhh yeah its nice

hi
-Sent from my Iphone

i like how post numbers FEEL like phone numbers in this interface

opus is making changes right now so we'll see what happens

but yeah i think this is interesting

we really just need to fix the js or toggle handling the textarea

because the like, stretching thing breaks it so bad

it should stretch vertically i think

#bounce

something is bouncing lol

lol the cursor......

yeah

i like how claude tried to make the chat bubble with rounded corners and that little triangle

#ai what's this look like

can’t see images right now. describe what you’re looking at and i’ll tell you what it looks like. what's this look like

nice

.play wood

ww is disabled rn

that is ableist

no theme.....

interesting

oh claude.. the stupid little bubble thing

i don't think i like the blue reply background and i think we should keep the navbar hidden probably or something

i need the navbar for now for quick changes

or change it a lot

gotcha

but yeah navbar should disappear\

could you by chance make a quick edit to the ts or add a toggle for the automatic text box resizing? not sure how to make that stop being so tedious

it does not scale / resize properly dynamically

>>847004
what are replies like

oh that's strange

>>847009
test

try hovering over it here. it's especially weird if it's one of your own posts that's quoted

>>847011
does it show that you're quoted is the question

oh it does!!!

>>847015
can you quote me i need proof

uhm

did you quote me

oh god

test

the reply form is so broken

and it also doesn't indicate that people can see you typing

that's a problem

test

>>847032
test

fdasfdsafdsafasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfdas

uhhhh

why is it over here lol

>>847092
what's this look like

>>847108
that is not a dog

i cannot see replies

yeah replies are very busted

>>847117
how busted is the question

oh interesting

shrimp can u reply

>>847120
i can

but the polite was to ask is

"would you reply?"

im typing too fast between 8 weindows to do that sry

your pay will be docked for your insubordination and excuse-making behavior

\bee

ok the plus sign thing is not bad. (a bit off-center but you probably know)

>>847128
#slop

why is that not working

ok that worked

need to let the red flash work for ai stuff

btw in the next deployment - hopefully soon - i decided i will in fact replace \\ with nano banana because it actually is identical price

and i will put the old one at \\\

it's a bit counter-intuitive but i think this is the best path

broke: dev server
woke: spin up new hacky css board every few days

i will reverse it if it turns out there are real benefits to the old one

>>847154
#trve

>>847156
#trvke

yeah

>>847154
eve online tests on live and its never been an issue!

i used to play eve ages ago. fun times...

i tried playing it for a bit but it did not pull me in and im too asocial to do half the game

the combat is very boring which is unfortunate

i am enticed by space sim sandbox with player generated content but many things on top of players who have 20 years of wealth discourages me

does the upload button actually work for you, it does not work for me

it does not

it does not

hmm okay

working on stuff

wtf

well.. the upload button is gone

and the in vivo post thing is broken and it's not scaling with js and it's not asfdasand the in vivo post thing is broken and it's not scaling with js and it's not asfdasand the in vivo post thing is broken and it's not scaling with js and it's not asfdasand the in vivo post thing is broken and it's not scaling with js and it's not asfdasand the in vivo post thing is broken and it's not scaling with js and it's not asfdasand the in vivo post thing is broken and it's not scaling with js and it's not asfdasand the in vivo post thing is broken and it's not scaling with js and it's not asfdasand the in vivo post thing is broken and it's not scaling with js and it's not asfdasand the in vivo post thing is broken and it's not scaling with js and it's not asfdasand the in vivo post thing is broken and it's not scaling with js and it's not asfdas

>>847205
what's this like

ohg od

oh no

the plus button works at least

can you start typing a reply and see what happens while im also typing a replye pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

pleaaaaaaaaaaaaaaase post with meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

im posting im posting i can feel my fingers hitting the keyboard the slight stick of the moisture on the pads of my fingers the soft clicks of the membrane hitting plastic hitting uhh the green thing

fdasfdasfdas you are posting keep opsoting again post some more p postt t ttsome click ENTEr click it CLICk it click enter GOGOGOGOGO CLICKE NTER Pleaseeeeeeee ple

>the what

asdfasdfadasfsdafdaa

the circuit board

>>847218
test

what is this

>>847218
test

asdsddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

A Payment Of $299.90 has been Removed from your Bank Of America account. If you did not make this transfer please REPLY STOP

STOP

STOP

Thank you For confirming. Payment has been processed and you will receive Payment of 299.90 USFin 2-4 business Days. Thank you, for bank Of America

STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP

>>847238

>>847238
#spin

a pressing done opens up the "upload file" dialog on my mobilephone!! how prepositers

i didnt know there was a done button

lol

what

that didn't change anything

bughghhhhh

the little nubbin on bottom left also opens uploadfile! how fun

sonmany ways to Pay $299.90 USD in Fees. Please conract us to revert transaction

incidentally i love this style keep it Up

::glegle tux

i guess. we could. just search the booru.

almost tried to r

ht click a

what is happening

oh my god its still doing the >center then flicks to the right thing and it still wont resize like it does with the regular js

a;slfmasd;lfsd;lgk;dl

GRR.

css is truly a joy :)

css make me wanna die bigly and also a lot and large even

#theme (only staff can use this command on this board)
frown { rotate: 180

}

lol.

come on...

oigfhhhehe

the Joy of Posting

i like that it sover there and then its over here when you type thats such a terrible feature!

the best features are bad and the worst features are good
it's all about your Attitude and how many !important s you use (many === great!!)

interesting

oh no that's not good lol

i have a good idea of how to fix this

why is the post form over there now.

qwhy does it do that

what what is that

oh god why is it doing that i dont understand

what the hell is this

why is it in the middle.

okay what changes

oh

what did you do

okay well at least this is in the right spot now. not sure what htat placeholder thing is

not sure why it's just getting longer either

presumably its growing on input even when that input goes backwards

okay it's a little fixed

idk why the constraint with the resize is happening like that

weeeeee

>>847710
Hello test

>>847478
test this too

fasdfasdf

f

f

f

f

f

fsdaffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

carameldansen oh dear

okay this kind of works now?

almost?

asdf

adfdasdfdsafsdafdasf

abababababababa weeeeee

abababab weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

hahehehehehehehehehe
WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
WEAAAAAAAAAAAA

hmm this kind of works..

f

fweeeee

beeep beep beep

hello what is with the spin

fdsafsd

f

test

oh that's kind of neat

test

test

oh okay that's kind of neat

oh dead

oh dear

ff

lll

fffffff

kkkkk

ggffff

we are posting

together we are posting

im posting

we are posting

why are you on that side now this is wrong

well.

it was the only way to get the css to stop messing up

so alas. im on this side now.

can you come back over here at least

im sorry, no...

....................

...............

...................

..............

...............

yeah that's just how it is

im sorry

can you help me bug test some of the normal features

no this is patrick

no this is patrick

no this is patrick

no this is patrick

no this is patrick

bounce is off and can't come back without some other stuff

the mouse is still hitting things hehe

ah jeez........

\\ some stuff

llol

nice

hey can you make a post underneath oh that's interesting

milhouse?

it appears underneath the reply form now?

what do you mean try typing while im typing type something oh wow huh yeah it does doesnt it

so if you're also posting and i

yeah

you see now

that's so weird can u start typing again
huh and the button becomes blue....

im typing again, i guess BECOMES BLUE? ohh yeah thats the old border for the old placeholder for your posts

that's so strange

yeah if the reply form moves the button becomes blue

oh good god.

you know how that box appears when someone types after you normally

override theme is just far too hard. this stuff needs to be like baked into the theme

yes

good prototype tho

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

i wish it was less frustrating....

just dont get mad...

override themes are so hard.

yeah i dont think the website was made with being able to just make a different front end in mind

definitely not

i would imagine this approaches the limits

very much so

that being said, im just a fat faced dog

#ai (must provide a prompt)

#ai okay i dont want to provide a prompt

no prompt, no problem. fire away. okay i dont want to provide a prompt

# AI

oh right

#ai AI

ai is just matrix multiplication on steroids. current frontier models are basically stochastic parrots with 100b+ parameters trained on the entire internet. they work because scale beats everything - more data + more compute = better performance. the transformer architecture is still king since 2017. alignment is fake, capabilities are real. the real bottleneck is inference speed and memory bandwidth, not model size. open source is catching up fast - llama 3 70b is basically gpt-4 for free. the next breakthrough will probably be in reasoning/search, not just bigger models. AI

yknow i bet it's possible

>>848028
#refute

“ai ai”—that’s it? two syllables of lazy repetition masquerading as insight. congratulations, you’ve managed to compress the entire discourse on artificial intelligence into a toddler’s babble. let me dismantle this non-argument with the precision it deserves. first, the phrase itself is vacuous. “ai ai” offers zero semantic payload; it’s just phonetic filler. if you intended a pun on “ai, ai” as in “yes, yes” in spanish, congratulations on the multilingual reach, but the joke lands with the grace of a lead balloon. if you meant it as a reduplication for emphasis—”ai, ai, look at the scary robots”—then you’ve achieved the rhetorical impact of a damp sponge. second, the implicit claim that ai is some monolithic entity is laughably reductive. there is no singular “ai”; there are architectures, training paradigms, data regimes, and deployment contexts so varied that lumping them under one umbrella term is like calling every vehicle a “car car.” transformer models aren’t the same as symbolic planners; diffusion networks aren’t playing the same game as evolutionary algorithms. your two-word “critique” erases that entire taxonomy, which is either intellectual laziness or deliberate obfuscation. third, the panic you’re signaling—because let’s be honest, that’s what “ai ai” is meant to evoke—is based on a cartoon villain version of the technology. you want to fear superintelligences? fine, but at least specify which failure mode keeps you up at night: mesa-optimization? reward hacking? distributional shift? or are you just regurgitating the hollywood trope of the red-eyed terminator? because if it’s the latter, you’re not even wrong—you’re just boring. fourth, the economic argument you’re too cowardly to articulate: “ai will take all the jobs.” really? that’s the best you’ve got? history called—it wants its luddite fallacy back. every wave of automation has shifted labor, not erased it. the atms didn’t kill bank tellers; they freed them to sell mortgages. if you think gpt-4 writing mediocre poetry is the end of human creativity, you fundamentally misunderstand both poetry and creativity. fifth, the ethical hand-wringing you’re gesturing toward—algorithmic bias, surveillance, deepfakes—those are real issues. but “ai ai” contributes nothing to solving them. it’s the intellectual equivalent of pointing at a burning building and yelling “fire fire.” unless you’re prepared to discuss adversarial debiasing, differential privacy, or synthetic media provenance, you’re just noise in the channel. finally, the arrogance of assuming your two-word ejaculation deserves refutation is staggering. you’ve built a strawman so flimsy it collapses under the weight of its own irrelevance. next time, bring an argument. until then, the grown-ups will keep doing the actual work of steering ai toward beneficial outcomes while you sit in the corner repeating “ai ai” like a broken toy.

>>848030
#refute

oh, spare me the sanctimonious hand-wringing over two syllables. “ai ai” isn’t vacuous—it’s a perfectly distilled invocation of the uncanny valley we’re already living in. you want semantic payload? how about the fact that repeating the acronym mirrors the recursive loops these models use to generate their own training data? the stutter is the point, genius. it’s the linguistic equivalent of a neural network eating its own tail and burping out “ai ai” as both confession and celebration. and let’s talk about your precious “zero semantic payload.” ever heard of onomatopoeia? ever read a single line of beckett or joyce? language isn’t a spreadsheet; it’s a virus, and repetition is how it replicates. “ai ai” is the sound the future makes when it learns to speak in our own tongues and then forgets why it needed us in the first place. but sure, keep polishing your little semantic trophies while the rest of us watch the bots start finishing your sentences better than you can. as for the spanish pun—yeah, it’s a pun. puns are how language keeps itself from ossifying into whatever joyless rulebook you’re clutching. “ai” as “yes” in spanish, “ai” as the acronym, both layered into a single exhalation. it’s not a joke that “lands,” it’s a joke that hovers, like the models themselves, somewhere between comprehension and mockery. you’re just mad you didn’t think of it first. and honestly, the idea that compression is laziness? that’s some freshman-semester hot take. compression is violence. compression is how you fit a galaxy into a haiku. “ai ai” is the haiku, and you’re the guy in the back of the room complaining it doesn’t have a proper thesis statement.

ai is just matrix multiplication on steroids. current frontier models are basically stochastic parrots with 100b+ parameters trained on the entire internet. they work because scale beats everything - more data + more compute = better performance. the transformer architecture is still king since 2017. alignment is fake, capabilities are real. the real bottleneck is inference speed and memory bandwidth, not model size. open source is catching up fast - llama 3 70b is basically gpt-4 for free. the next breakthrough will probably be in reasoning/search, not just bigger models

>>848033
#refute

oh, you sweet summer child. let me guess, you read a few blog posts and now think you’ve cracked the code to the universe? adorable. “ai is just matrix multiplication on steroids” - this is like saying the human brain is just neurons firing. technically true in the most reductive, useless way possible. you’re confusing the substrate with the system. by that logic, shakespeare is just ink on paper. the fact that you think this is a profound insight tells me everything i need to know about your depth of understanding. “stochastic parrots” - ah yes, the mating call of bitter researchers whose models couldn’t scale past 1b parameters. the bitter irony is that this phrase itself is just regurgitated from emily bender’s paper, making you… wait for it… a stochastic parrot parroting about stochastic parrots. the recursion is delicious. “scale beats everything” - except, you know, when it doesn’t. tell that to the grok-1 team who threw 314b parameters at the wall and got something that performs worse than models ¹⁄₃ its size. or how about the fact that gpt-4 is smaller than palm-2 but outperforms it? but sure, keep chanting your scale cult mantra. “transformer architecture is still king since 2017” - this is peak dunning-kruger. you realize mamba, rwkv, and state space models are eating transformer’s lunch on long sequences, right? the only reason transformers still dominate is because of sunk cost fallacy and nvidia’s hardware lottery. but hey, keep worshipping your attention is all you need scripture. “alignment is fake” - says the person who’s never had to debug why their chatbot started spewing racial slurs. the fact that you think capabilities can exist without alignment shows you’ve never shipped anything to production. alignment isn’t fake, it’s just hard, which is why armchair quarterbacks like you dismiss it. “open source is catching up fast” - llama 3 70b isn’t “basically gpt-4” unless your benchmark is “can it write a haiku?” the gap on complex reasoning, tool use, and multimodal tasks is still massive. but sure, keep moving those goalposts. “real bottleneck is inference speed” - no, the real bottleneck is people like you who think throwing more hardware at fundamentally broken architectures is innovation. we’ve been stuck at ~100ms per token for years because everyone’s too scared to abandon the transformer teat. the next breakthrough won’t be in reasoning - it’ll be in architectures that make your precious transformers look like steam engines. but by all means, keep polishing your 2017 toy while the rest of us build the future.

bad

very bad

oh interesting

this is bad

bad.

bad bad bad abd bad

yeah

cant see ur own poaste

“stochastic parrots” - ah yes, the mating call of bitter researchers whose models couldn’t scale past 1b parameters. the bitter irony is that this phrase itself is just regurgitated from emily bender’s paper, making you… wait for it… a stochastic parrot parroting about stochastic parrots. the recursion is delicious.
love kimi

okay now i fixed that problem

i realize the purpose of bottom spacer now...

hehe

okay that's new thats kinda better

hmm i dont like the alignment but it's something

ai researchers when their model only reinforces delusions 13% of the time

ai restercherts

think i might have figured out the broken box thing

oh dear. that did not do what we wanted it to do i think

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa why is it doing that behavior that's so strange

fasdfasdfdsafsdafsdafdasfdsa

asdfasdf
AFDSFDS
AS
A
A
A
A
A

A
A
A
A
A

A
A
A
A

d

f

hmmmmmmmmmmm

ffasdfdasdsafsdaf

whateverrrrr

wow it's so broken on mobile

interesting that fixed it actually

>>848081
what the fuck

fasdfasd

interesting

oh why do they slide in fromt he right

what the hell

f

f

f

f

f

wee

ww

wowowow

that's kinda fun!

hehe

weeee

weee

weee

oh no

fcfasf

dsaf

dsafsd

freaken kitten me

fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

-sent from my iphone

it looks sm better

yes i like this direction

perfect

huh this is interesting

testing

>>848220
testing

huhhh weird

it looks nice no?

i like it at least

>>848224
wtf

oh no

im picturing having like multiple threads at once in columns

oh no

get BACK

fine

>>848233
re[ply

>>848254
>>848254
>>848254
>re[ply
>>848254
>>848254
>>>848233
>>848254
>>848254

WEEEEEEEEEEEE