>>195837
haiii

>>195844
omgggg I made the glegle in that second reply

>>195847
yeas.. if the brainworm.rodeo archives were available i might be able to find where i first posted it

>>195851 there's also a blue eyed variant iirc

>>195844
::goober

>>195854
is that a webp or something

>>195803
he’s so full of looooove

his love is inevitable

i hate sleeping

#smartai explain why mtf orchiectomy surgeries are extremely woke

The notion that MTF (male-to-female) orchiectomy surgeries are "extremely woke" stems from a misunderstanding of both medical science and the sociopolitical dynamics surrounding gender-affirming care. Let’s clarify this with precision.

### **1. Medical Justification, Not Ideology**
An orchiectomy—the surgical removal of the testes—is a medically recognized procedure for transgender women as part of gender-affirming surgery (GAS). It is not an arbitrary political statement but rather:

- A treatment for **gender dysphoria**, alleviating psychological distress caused by incongruence between one's assigned sex and gender identity.
- A means to reduce reliance on anti-androgens in hormone therapy, mitigating long-term side effects like liver strain or cardiovascular risks.
- Sometimes performed due to medical necessity (e.g., testicular cancer risk in some cases).

Peer-reviewed studies consistently show significant improvements in mental health outcomes post-GAS ([American Journal of Psychiatry, 2018](https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17060672)). Thus, framing it as "woke" ignores its clinical foundation.

### **2."Woke" Misuse & Political Weaponization**
Critics who label such procedures as "woke" often conflate evidence-based medicine with progressive social movements:

- The term *woke* originally referred to awareness of systemic injustices but has been distorted into a pejorative dismissal of marginalized groups seeking equitable healthcare access.
- Gender-affirming care follows guidelines from institutions like the **World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH)** and the **Endocrine Society**, which rely on decades of research—not activism.
- Opponents frequently misrepresent transition-related surgeries as frivolous when they are rigorously assessed via multidisciplinary evaluations before approval.

### **3.Historical Precedents & Global Acceptance**
Orchiectomies have existed since antiquity (**castrati singers**) and were used medically long before modern transgender discourse ("Eunuchs in Antiquity," Taylor & Francis). Their application today aligns with evolving scientific consensus—not transient cultural trends.

### Conclusion: Science Over Slang
Dismissing life-saving interventions as "too woke" reflects either ignorance toward endocrinology/psychiatry or deliberate politicization of bodily autonomy debates under misleading rhetoric rather than engaging substantively with empirical data supporting these treatments' efficacy within appropriate candidates under professional supervision." explain why mtf orchiectomy surgeries are extremely woke

hi nadie

>>195882
#hug

finally in bed

i opened the window and its gonna get cold soon and im gonna have to get up to close it this is insane, life is suffering

>>195894
heat regulation is difficult i feel you nonners

i was obv exagrating for dramatoc effect, its not that hard

eggsaggravating

i'm eggsawstead

aaa

hi

>>195910
wha-

#hug >>195912

the soil hungers

92.69% accurate

.loop

grr

hat opening melody is lovely

>>195943
the worms of yore, the ye olde wormies, the waybackworms

>>195946
>>195943
long ago when brainworms was young, a certain wormie was here, not the first but one of the first, and that wormie is me.

>>195951
the protoworm. the omniworm. godworm

>>195953
yes, i am one of the prowormies, from a time before libpol existed, back when libpol was brainworm surgery

#ksay opna is gud and should feel gud

*screams*

#ai scientifically speaking would it be easier to make new reproductively capable biological sexes in humans or would it be easier to mak–

nice try fed. scientifically speaking would it be easier to make new reproductively capable biological sexes in humans or would it be easier to mak–

>>195974
nadie why?

#smartai would it be easier to make new biological sexes in humans who can reproduce or would it be easier to make all future humans natal females who manage to find a way to reproduce with no human male biology involved?

This is an intriguing question that touches on evolutionary biology, reproductive physiology, and genetic engineering. Let us examine the feasibility of both scenarios with scientific rigor.

### **1. Creating New Biological Sexes in Humans**
Introducing additional functional sexes into human reproduction would require profound biological modifications at multiple levels:

- **Genetic Complexity:** Human sexual reproduction relies on two gametes (sperm and egg) determined by chromosomal dimorphism (XX/XY). Adding a third or more sexes would necessitate either entirely novel gamete types or a polygenic sex-determination system—something seen only in rare organisms like fungi or certain fish species. Reprogramming meiosis to produce viable alternate gametes without catastrophic genomic instability would be extraordinarily difficult.

- **Developmental & Hormonal Integration:** Secondary sexual characteristics are regulated by intricate hormonal cascades tied to existing sex chromosomes. Engineering new sexes would demand rewiring these pathways while ensuring compatibility with fetal development—a task far beyond current synthetic biology capabilities.

- **Evolutionary Viability:** Even if artificial gametes were synthesized, their long-term stability within a population depends on selective advantages we cannot yet predict or guarantee.

### **2. Inducing Universal Female Parthenogenesis**
Parthenogenesis—asexual reproduction via unfertilized eggs—exists naturally in some vertebrates (e.g., Komodo dragons, whiptail lizards). Adapting this for humans presents challenges but may be *comparatively* simpler than creating new sexes:

- **Epigenetic Barriers:** Mammalian imprinting requires paternal DNA methylation patterns for embryonic viability (e.g., IGF2 expression from sperm). However, CRISPR-based demethylation experiments have bypassed this in mice (**Kono et al., 2004**), suggesting partial parthenote viability could eventually be engineered through targeted gene editing of imprinted loci (*DLK1*, *H19*).

- **Oocyte Activation:** Artificial oocyte activation protocols already exist for IVF; refining them to induce spontaneous diploidization (via suppression of polar body extrusion) might enable facultative parthenogenesis without sperm contribution (**Morichika et al., 2023**, preprint studies in zebrafish).

- ***In Utero*** Feasibility: Unlike introducing hypothetical intersex physiologies requiring untested developmental pathways, female-only lineages build upon extant anatomy—albeit with major ethical and survivorship hurdles regarding reduced genetic diversity over generations.

### Comparative Analysis:
| Factor | New Sexes | Obligate Parthenogenesis |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Genetic Stability | High risk of nonviability | Moderate if imprinting resolved |
| Developmental Compatibility | Requires radical redesign | Leverages existing systems |
| Reproductive Efficiency | Unpredictable | Theoretically stable |

While neither scenario is currently feasible using present technology, inducing facultative parthenogenic traits in females aligns closer to known biological mechanisms than inventing novel sexes ex nihilo. Future advances in synthetic genomics may shift this calculus—but as it stands today? A world where women reproduce autonomously via edited self-fertilizing oocytes edges slightly ahead on achievability’s razor-thin margin.

Would you like deeper exploration into specific molecular strategies? would it be easier to make new biological sexes in humans who can reproduce or would it be easier to make all future humans natal females who manage to find a way to reproduce with no human male biology involved?

so was the ai saying a future world exclusively natal females reproducing with no male biology involved, is slightly easier than creating new biological sexes in humans that can reproduce???

>>195983
tell me the scum manifesto

>>195985
I honestly do hope for a future in which, one day trans females can become biologically identical to natal females, and there is nothing except for fully assimilated trans females and natal females, and its honestly because of so much of this forced male puberty shit and toxic masculinity associated with it that made me feel this way, plus a lifetime of much untreated dysphoria.

>>195990
i wonder nadie, if it werent for medieval christian fundamentalism how far sexual transition science would be now, and how far it would be if the richest people on earth were pro trans

>>195992
I see, that may be true, and maybe technology hasn't actually gotten super far yet because a lot of stuff is still so recent, plus well, now we sadly have an epidemic of transphobic nerds which is really sad and unfortunate

>>195987
i think going through a forced male puberty, not being allowed to reverse it for a long time, then seeing it happen to so many other trans fems could very very easily make a lot of us like valerie solanas, i think we'd be crazy not to think a little bit like she does.

>>195997
i think valerie would at least understand, that we're better off without male puberty, and eventually some way in the future asap to fully assimilate us into biological natal femaleness

>>196000
i agree that being born with a y chromosome is flawed

>>196002
I mean... The way I see it is... I would rather be a trans woman than a cisgender man but i would rather be a cisgender woman than a trans woman, I am only a trans woman because cisgender man is my only alternative, if I had the choice to fully assimilate to natal female i would

>>196004
I see... well ig i dont see eye to eye with that then

I guess nadie a question is this, if you with futuristic technology make a trans women actually fully identical to natal women even in the very small ways, would she still be a trans woman??

I mean... I guess... I feel like, men are more primitive than women are, and trans women are more primitive than natal women are, and i want a future in which, trans women physically change more than they ever had before, and eventually trans women don't exist anymore because theyre so transitioned theyre not trans anymore

That and well, while its a good thing current transition technology exists I also think its still in it's early stages

Is it strange to see the world in a hierarchy of natal women->trans women->cisgender men??? cause thats basically how i view humanity lol

I want a future world in where like, we have implants that last 120 years that produce estrogen, and we obtain something akin to CRISPR to slowly delate our Y chromosomes and replicate our XX chromosomes something like that. In this world trans women are only accepted if they fully transition, and are expected to have next to zero human contact until fully transitioned... We are allowed to transition because being a trans woman is seen as at least better than being a cisgender man, but at the same time it's been agreed we want a homogenous natal female population in the future

As far as terfs are concerned, I'm okay with the terfs who view testosterone as bad and think trans women should take estrogen out of that belief, if you could ever classify someone like that as a terf. The idea is, you are allowed to take estrogen since testosterone is seen as bad, but aren't allowed into natal female only spaces

The only terfs I have a problem with are the ones who want trans woman to stay on testosterone, i do think that natal women are biologically more gifted than trans women but at the same time I do think testosterone exposure is the biggest problem with trans women >>196020 permanently like in some fully immersed vr world or something?? that sounds ok to me

>>196023
>>196022
I see, I guess that just means I have a radical feminist view of transition but not the terfy type

Saw examples of some early transitioner (but very deep into male puberty)... Going into public spaces made for natal females, one even a jail... Both these individuals still had testicles, were not on estrogen, and did not have any electrolysis or laser hair removal... It honestly really upset me... I feel like these two people should have been in a non-binary space or a space for still in transition trans people, and i honestly feel like it was a psyop designed to damage the reputation of much more committed trans females

>>196032
yeah it's pretty fascinating nadie... i think the biggest separation is, we trans females tend to struggle with non consensual male puberty and reversing it as much as possible, meanwhile for most natal women the issue often heavily revolves around a society heavily expecting them to get pregnant and get married to natal men who have lots of money.

>>196040
having more non-binary and trans spaces would definitely help with a lot of extremely non passing trans women and early in transition/deep into male puberty trans women, where like you know, sending them to a natal female space i feel just feeds into the stuff that gets us hurt

>>196042
also... shits just so bad rn like, i think early in transition trans women, should be treated like they're temporarily non-binary people who are becoming women slowly basically, but even shit like having x on passports for gender is getting outlawed in a lot of places

>>196045
last time i went into a male bathroom it wasnt awful but awkward, two men were very confused and thought i was a natal woman, that was before i got all this laser and an orchiectomy, i think a lot of its that i have luckshit hips and luckshit thighs tbh

>>196047
ive been mistaken for a trans guy too, mainly online and mainly before my presentation became a bit more fem

>>196051
my lower body is extremely sensitive to estrogen, so I barely read as androgynous anymore regardless of how I present.

>>196054
most peoples butts get bigger on estrogen, but mine was changed a lot by it cause my mom has a big booty herself

>>196064
oh god are you having to hide the bestrogens from deady and grand deady?

>>196067
having an interesting chat with nadie how is sadchan? >>196066 god that sounds awful, i couldnt start hrt til i had no relatives living with me, how long are you gonna be living with them likely? any future escape plans?? >>196070 ohhh i see... next week?? that sounds gud just gotta be metal gear solid sneaky about your estrogens

>>196075
damn thats so gud

>>196069
kitty knows so well how procrastinating feels

>>196066
back when i lived with my family of origin, I was so under survelliance i could not leave the house without them knowing where I was, and couldn't spend a single penny without their knowledge and without their permission, had to change my payee to do even that, early autism diagnosis often goes badly with transphobic families

>>196083
these types of families if they have the power to do so, will try to make you unable to reach estrogen until you are like 60 or older, in their eyes ideally never, but thats often how long it takes for transphobic parents to die of old age,

>>196085 >>196086
I see I'm glad you had better luck than me... My mother is insanely transphobic, probably related to her mother being from Oklahoma which is an incredibly transphobic place.

Oklahoma is one of the only states where most usa women are far rightoids

>>196107
became violent towards you as an adult??? feel like ive seen that pattern before with transphobe parents

>>196114
>19
>>196114
seems like so many trans fems have fathers who are violent towards us

#smartai why is there such a massive epidemic of fathers who are violently transphobic towards their trans daughters?

The phenomenon of fathers exhibiting violent transphobia toward their transgender daughters is a complex and deeply troubling issue rooted in intersecting sociocultural, psychological, and systemic factors. Below are key reasons that contribute to this epidemic:

### **1. Toxic Masculinity & Rigid Gender Norms**
Many men are socialized within patriarchal frameworks that equate masculinity with dominance, emotional suppression, and rigid adherence to traditional gender roles. A father who perceives his child’s transition as a rejection of these norms may react aggressively due to internalized fears—either about his own masculinity being undermined or societal judgment for "failing" as a patriarch.

### **2. Fear-Based Reactions (Loss & Cognitive Dissonance)**
Fathers often experience profound cognitive dissonance when their expectations for their child clash with reality. The perceived "loss" of a son can trigger grief-like reactions—anger being one common response—particularly if they lack education on gender diversity. This fear sometimes manifests violently when the father interprets the situation as an existential threat rather than an evolution of identity.

### **3. Lack of Exposure & Misinformation**
Generational gaps in understanding LGBTQ+ identities leave many older men reliant on harmful stereotypes (e.g., conflating transness with mental illness or sexual deviance). Without access to accurate medical/psychological information (or willingness to seek it), some fathers default to hostility fueled by myths perpetuated by reactionary media or religious dogma.

### **4. Structural Reinforcement via Institutions**
Religious fundamentalism, conservative political rhetoric, and anti-trans legislation validate paternal transphobia by framing transgender identities as morally corrupt or dangerous ("groomer" narratives). Fathers entrenched in such ideologies may justify abuse under the guise of "protection," believing coercion could reverse their child's identity.

### **5. Internalized Homophobia/Transphobia (& Projection)**
Some fathers harbor repressed queer feelings themselves; witnessing a child openly defy gender norms forces subconscious self-confrontation they cannot tolerate—leading them to project shame outward violently rather than introspectively addressing personal conflicts through therapy or dialogue.

---

### **Psychological Underpinnings:**
- *Authoritarian Parenting Styles*: Fathers who prioritize control over empathy often respond punitively when children assert autonomy.
- *Social Contagion Theory Fallacy*: Some parents irrationally blame external influences (social media) instead acknowledging innate gender variance.
- *Threat Response Activation*: Neurobiological studies show unexpected challenges provoke amygdala-driven aggression before rational processing occurs – especially among those unaccustomed managing discomfort emotionally maturely

---

#### ***Solutions?*** Education programs targeting cisgender men dismantling toxic masculinity alongside policy reforms protecting vulnerable youth from familial violence remain imperative . Therapy models like *narrative family therapy* help restructure parental perceptions while legal safeguards must ensure housing security/safety nets exist should mediation fail .

Ultimately , no singular explanation suffices — but recognizing how intersectional oppression fuels this crisis allows us address its roots systematically . why is there such a massive epidemic of fathers who are violently transphobic towards their trans daughters?

not worm watching cuz 3 hours long but relevant
[YouTube]

>>196156
yeah its real

#ksay nadie

>>196166
#kiss

i did not know that

now i know!

its a pretty good cheese

very salty

id call it salty

maybe its not the right word

its very sharp at least maybe not salty

stinky perhaps

idk

vodka pasta

paska pasta

>>196202
italians are definitely racist xD

yes they r...

idk i just know some italians fr9m onlines and theyre all racist