>>391798
im having trouble getting throuhg this. please sell me on it please.

>>391812
im trying ok

>>391816
well i know that u look pretty

guys help me convince rose shes pretty

>>391821
pretty...

>>391822
#hug
#smooch
pretty girl

>>388954
bazed bazed bazed

>>391823
REAL

>>391822
hugging u and kissing u and petting u because ur so pretty

but also I don't have much interesting to say ngl

awwwooooooo

awroooooo

>>391845
#hug

what happened?

I don't like non-hugboxing I want humanity to defeat vanity and everyone in the world to feel good

>>391852
this u?

>>391851
oh nooooooooooo

It's rose orlando!!!!

>>391852
but i am leaping out in front of u with a great piece of cardboard and shielding u from the rocks

Rock on rose!

based!!!!!!!!!!

#write my friend has gotten into betting on politics and compares it to stock brokers. I think it's wrong to spend money if it doesn't make society better so they're both immoral and shouldn't be allowed. Why might I be wrong?

you're assuming all financial activity must directly improve society, but that's a pretty rigid moral framework. lots of things people spend money on don't directly help others—entertainment, hobbies, personal luxuries—yet we tolerate them because autonomy matters. betting on politics might be dumb, but policing harmless behavior just because you dislike it risks an overreach of control. also, markets (even prediction markets) aggregate information in ways that can actually help society—betting odds often predict outcomes better than polls. still kinda sketchy to profit off dysfunction, but banning it entirely is drastic. maybe focus on limiting predatory behavior rather than the whole concept. my friend has gotten into betting on politics and compares it to stock brokers. I think it's wrong to spend money if it doesn't make society better so they're both immoral and shouldn't be allowed. Why might I be wrong?

>>391862
#reply but don't people gamble expecting to win? It's not like tennis where her partners walk away happy if she's right, right? gambling is either zero sum, or probably negatives sum

yeah but betting isn't just neutral, it's actively bad. gamblers lose money to the house on average, which just funnels cash to already-rich bookies. even "skilled" gambling like poker extracts value from worse players without creating anything. unlike hobbies which are at worst zero-sum, gambling is negative-sum. seems indefensible. but don't people gamble expecting to win? It's not like tennis where her partners walk away happy if she's right, right? gambling is either zero sum, or probably negatives sum

i feel like no matter how pretty u r people dont come up to u about it in the street

>>391870
ur very pretty and good and worthwile

>>391868
#reply so what are the defences of things like shorts and stock brokers betting on things going up or down? when might that be useful?

ts and stock brokers use bets (options, shorts, etc.) to hedge risk or speculate, which can stabilize markets or provide liquidity. useful when you're trying to lock in prices or offset potential losses, but obviously still risky.

gambling's negative-sum because the house takes a cut, but markets are more nuanced—some bets (like hedging) reduce overall risk, while speculation can add liquidity. still, most retail traders lose money, much like gamblers. zero-sum between participants, negative-sum after fees and spreads, unless it's serving a broader economic purpose (like price discovery).

indefensible if it's purely exploitative, but not all betting is created equal—finance sometimes uses it as a tool rather than just extraction. still, most people shouldn't treat it like a game. so what are the defences of things like shorts and stock brokers betting on things going up or down? when might that be useful?

>>391882
nooooooooooooo roooooooseeeeeee *grabs the dust off the ground and holds it up in my hands*

rose.......... im so sorry..... *the dust slowly begins to fall through hmy hands as i begin to cry*

*i finally give up and let my hands fall to my side and my knees to the ground, defeated, as u scatter to the wind*

if only i had told her how beautiful she was....................

>>391879
#reply go deeper into that please. Can you give an example of a time a company that does useful things might do more useful things because of stocks people doing the gambling type stuff?

l, it's a double-edged sword. shorts and options let you hedge against downturns (e.g., a farmer betting against crops to protect from price drops) or provide price discovery (exposing overvalued stocks). brokers facilitate this, but yeah, can turn casino-like when speculation overshadows fundamentals.

key defenses:
- shorts keep valuations honest (enron, wirecard).
- hedges protect businesses/folios from volatility.
- liquidity from speculators tightens spreads.

still, degenerates ruin it by treating it like roulette—no real utility there. go deeper into that please. Can you give an example of a time a company that does useful things might do more useful things because of stocks people doing the gambling type stuff?

>>391886
i am feeling very happy and also giving u a kiss on the forehead right now and hygging u also......

>>391884
#reply shouldn't people failing to buy the stocks keep valuation honest? do any farmers actually sell options on their crops? wouldn't that be unprofitable in either case?

sure, think about tesla in 2019. stock was getting hammered by major short pressure while they were barely making cars profitably. the relentless shorting forced musk & co to tighten operations, cut waste, and push harder on innovation just to survive. that external pressure from market gamblers (shorts betting against them) arguably accelerated their transition to real profitability and scale.

or biotech - short sellers uncovering fraud at companies like valiant pharma saved investors from sinking money into scams. the "useless" gambling actually performed a market-cleaning function that helped legit firms by weeding out bad actors stealing capital.

it's messy, but the casino aspect can sometimes pressure management or expose rot that'd otherwise stay hidden in a purely "long-only" market. not saying it always works this way, but the adversarial element has utility alongside the degeneracy. shouldn't people failing to buy the stocks keep valuation honest? do any farmers actually sell options on their crops? wouldn't that be unprofitable in either case?

>>391889
#smooch

>>391893
awawawawawwa awrooooo meoe meow purrrrrrr

well that was some fucking faggotry

omg cute

>>391891
#reply why were they forced to change? If I get the people who own a company to pay me when it crashes, that doesn't stop it from crashing right? why would a shorted company actually change? what incentive is there?

efficiency and profitability. shorts can act as a form of market discipline—forcing management to deliver or get wrecked. but it's a double-edged sword. if shorting gets too aggressive, it can push a legit business into a death spiral (even if it’s fundamentally solid), just from forced liquidations or scared investors bailing.

as for farmers selling options on crops—yeah, they do. it’s called hedging, and it’s standard in commodities markets. if you’re growing corn, you might sell futures contracts to lock in a price today, protecting against future price drops. not directly comparable to stock shorts, but same concept: managing risk. the difference is that farmers have a real, physical product, while stock shorts are just betting on price movement (often with no actual stake in the company beyond the trade). why were they forced to change? If I get the people who own a company to pay me when it crashes, that doesn't stop it from crashing right? why would a shorted company actually change? what incentive is there?

>>391902
ehehehe

>>391901
hi u just missed the faggotry

>>391910
me and rose hugged and kissed and stuff.......

>ordor borgor
>1:30 hrs later
>borger waltzes in finally

if u were a noodle you would be snaeki

im a computuah

hi rose

>>391937
i can get u some
whats your address and debit card information

>>391940
i thought that was the name of the movie

>weba
oh now i get what that means

>>391947
..from patchouli?

>>391952
their*
#edit her -> their

>>391956
i cant believe i did the reddit asterisk correction thing im actually also sorry

:DDD hi chat !!!

>>391960
this is not true

#ai can you explain glegle

glegle's just a lil guy. a fluffy creature that vibes and spreads good energy. not really any deeper meaning, just a cute nonbinary mascot to brighten your day. no lore, just good vibes. can you explain glegle

>>391968
no it is not... glegle is a friend to everyone
a nonspecific animal..

>>391973
this is cruel..,..,.,,.,.,..,. glegle is not a she

ohhhhhhhhhh

>>391980
>femboy flag

>>391991
hhEEHEEEE

burber..,.

this is what i actually look like without the ears though and also without hair like parted int he middle and also withot vector graphic

#ksay i need to be glay glowed. i need to look like gloyp glamp. my glay gloo

I'm not gay or anything but sometimes if I'm really horny I smell weird and feel weird and I wonder what it would be like to be with another guy and Snell that on him and taste it and stuff but I'm not gay

>>392008
#yeet
::happygle

>>392011
it, was too sad

>>392018
NO

oh no

>>392048
you're a rock star

>>392052
idk but twinkanon is having a hard time interacting w/you

>>392056
assigned female by twinkanon

fattot

>>392064
can someone mop this up

if it was morning youd be awaeki

>>392074
flower 2 came out i already pre ordered

wait since when can we upload .pdfs

hhhhhuh i didnt think the website had handling for pdfs

.skip (voted to skip this video)

>>392078
September 9 2023

It's irrelevant now

>>392078
>they're hoodies

>>392098
no im no no , uh
sorr ny uh

>Sisters, I tell you

.skip (voted to skip this video)

utterly delusional

>>392111
>>392112
you have bad taste

>>392113
why are u so mean

>>392117
I hate rock music

>>392119
dodges the question

>>392124
>>392123
>>392122
Let me guess. You're all white.

>>392126
i am but i had to make that choice to fit with the character

>19:16

>>392142
illiteracy award

>>392140
conversion therapy is this easy
i am no longer queer ?

>>392144
illiteracy award

>>392147
excellent post
well posted rose

Im barry obama BITCH!!!

i love glegle

>>392162

>>392162