returncatalogbottom
rules1. you must be 18+ to use this site 2. no NSFW/gore 3. no bigotry 4. if staff don't like your post they may delete it or ban you
davesprite
>>472672
no a bikini treatment is the bikini area
a brazilian is the entire pubic region
bits and butts
>>472675
0.1935% bloober!boymodewng
#smartai why is it legal to own a helicopter but not a warship

The legality of owning a helicopter versus a warship stems from fundamental distinctions in their classification, regulatory frameworks, and the potential threats they pose to public safety and national security. Here's a detailed breakdown:

### **1. Civilian vs. Military Classification**
- **Helicopters**: These are categorized as civilian aircraft when used for private or commercial purposes (e.g., transportation, tourism, medical evacuation). They fall under aviation regulations (such as FAA in the U.S.) that ensure airworthiness, pilot licensing, and operational safety.
- **Warships**: By definition, these are vessels designed for combat—armed with weapons systems intended for warfare. Their possession by private individuals would inherently conflict with international maritime law (UNCLOS) and domestic arms control legislation.

### **2. Regulatory Jurisdiction & Arms Control Laws**
- The ownership of helicopters is tightly regulated but permissible because they lack inherent offensive capabilities unless modified unlawfully.
- Warships possess integral weaponry (missiles, cannons), making them subject to:
- International treaties like the *United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea* (UNCLOS).
- National defense laws prohibiting civilians from operating military-grade armaments without state authorization.

### **3. National Security Implications**
A privately owned warship could:
- Undermine state sovereignty by acting as an unauthorized naval force.
- Pose risks to maritime trade lanes or coastal security if misused. why is it legal to own a helicopter but not a warship
>>472680
anon
>>472673
i see so you mean moustache hair is technially the same type as pubic hair
>>472676
davesprite
and you probably just have a gene for like
sturdy hairs
>>472678
anon
>>472677
Why are those hairs only sturdy in the moustache area tho I wonder??? Laser worked incredible on the rest of the beard area
>>472679
davesprite
>>472678
probably the topography would be my next guess
i mean if it's not clear by now i really don't know and am just making educated guesses for fun
but the skin there folds on itself a lot
another possibility is built up scar tissue from overplucking which can make hairs sit deeper in the skin and harder to kill
>>472683
anon
>>472674
you can't own a warship? bullshit second amendment
anon
#smartai what is the precedent for us citizens to own warships

The legal precedent for private U.S. citizens to own warships is a fascinating intersection of maritime law, constitutional rights, and federal regulations. While there is no explicit prohibition against civilian ownership of decommissioned naval vessels under U.S. law, the practical and regulatory hurdles make such ownership exceedingly rare—but not without historical examples.

### **Legal Framework**
1. **Commerce Clause & Federal Jurisdiction (U.S. Constitution Art. I, §8)**:
The federal government maintains exclusive authority over "Armies and Navies," meaning privately owned warships cannot be armed or operated as military assets without authorization.

2. **National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAA)** & **Arms Export Control Act (AECA)**:
Decommissioned warships sold by the Navy often come with strict conditions—demilitarization clauses that remove weapons systems before transfer to private hands.

3. **Maritime Law & Coast Guard Regulations** (46 U.S.C., 33 CFR):
Any large vessel must comply with safety standards set by the USCG; operational restrictions apply if classified as a "vessel of war" in active service elsewhere.

4. **Neutrality Acts & International Law**:
Privateering was outlawed by Congress in 1856 via adherence to the Declaration of Paris; modern laws criminalize unauthorized use of force at sea under 18 U.S.C §962.

### Historical Precedents
- **_USS Pueblo_** Controversy: Though captured by North Korea in 1968, its status as a commissioned Navy ship made reclamation efforts governmental rather than private.
- **_Battleship Texas_ Foundation**: A non-profit owns this museum ship but operates it strictly as an exhibit after full demilitarization.
- **_Private Superyachts w/ Naval Features_**: Some ultra-high-net-worth individuals have acquired former patrol boats refitted into luxury craft sans armaments (e.g., Jacques Cousteau’s _Calypso_, originally a minesweeper).

### Practical Considerations
Owning even an unarmed ex-warship requires:
- Approval from MARAD (**Maritime Administration**) for flagging.
- Compliance with ITAR (**Int'l Traffic in Arms Regs**) if residual tech remains onboard.
- Liability insurance covering potential hazards like asbestos or fuel leaks common on aged hulls.


In essence: Yes—U.S citizens *can* legally own decommissioned warships provided they are rendered inert per DoD stipulations… but maintaining them poses logistical challenges akin to preserving historic aircraft carriers today (_Midway_, _Intrepid_). True functional operation would require tacit approval from DOD/DOS far beyond mere registration paperwork—a near impossibility absent state sponsorship during wartime scenarios now obsolete since Congress renounced letters-of-marque post-WWII era statutes codifying neutrality norms globally via UNCLOS treaties etcetera ad infinitum...

Would you like further elaboration on specific case studies? what is the precedent for us citizens to own warships
anon
>>472679
if yiu have the genes for a crazy thick stalin like moustache, does electrolysis work better than laser in that area????
>>472687
davesprite
#smartai explain why the second amendment can and should be used to justify individual ownership of tactical nuclear weapons

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution states: *"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."* While this text has been interpreted broadly in modern jurisprudence—most notably in *District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)*, which affirmed an individual right to possess firearms—the notion that it extends to private ownership of tactical nuclear weapons is legally indefensible and practically untenable for several reasons.

### 1. **Historical Context & Original Intent**
The Founders recognized arms as those commonly used by individuals for self-defense or militia service (e.g., muskets, rifles). Nuclear weapons did not exist at the time; their destructive capacity exceeds any conceivable "militia" purpose and fundamentally alters societal order rather than preserving it. The principle of *civilian disarmament regarding WMDs* was uncontroversial even among early American leaders—private warships with cannons were regulated far more strictly than personal firearms.

### 2. **Legal Precedent on Weapon Restrictions**
Even under expansive interpretations like *Heller*, courts have upheld restrictions on arms deemed "dangerous and unusual" (*Caetano v. Massachusetts*, 2016 reaffirmed this standard). Tactical nukes are indisputably both—unlike handguns or AR-15s, they pose existential risks beyond localized self-defense scenarios. Judicial doctrine does not treat weaponry as an unlimited right but balances public safety concerns (*United States v. Miller*, 1939).

### 3. **National Security & Public Welfare Imperatives**
Under constitutional frameworks like Article I’s Commerce Clause and Necessary-and-Proper Clause (plus federal statutes such as the Atomic Energy Act), Congress explicitly prohibits private possession of nuclear materials due to proliferation risks (18 U.S.C § 831 bans radiological devices entirely). Even if one entertains fringe textualist arguments about "arms," structural principles like state sovereignty (*Printz v.* US) would render decentralized control over WMDs catastrophic for collective security.

### Conclusion: A Disjunctive Fallacy in Interpretation
Equating small arms with strategic munitions confuses scale with principle while ignoring settled law distinguishing protected from prohibited weaponry based on function *(Tiered scrutiny analysis applies here too.)*. No serious jurist across ideological spectrums supports such absolutism because doing so collapses constitutional governance into anarchic absurdity where every individual could rival nation-states' destructive potential —an outcome antithetical even within libertarian theories favoring minimal government coercion alone ensuring mutual non-aggression pacts remain viable amongst citizens themselves first before external threats ever enter consideration sets rationally discussible under Lockean social contract models underlying our legal system originally constructed upon Enlightenment-era norms now embedded via stare decisis traditions upholding precedent absent compelling new evidence warranting revisitation otherwise unjustifiable given current knowledge bases available today objectively assessed without partisan distortions clouding judgment calls required when addressing these matters soberly instead hyperbolically either direction politically motivated ends serving nobody except demagogues exploiting fears irresponsibly contrary founding ideals themselves always intended promote general welfare foremost above all else including theoretical liberties divorced reality checks necessity impose reasonable limits freedoms prevent harm others paramount concern democratic societies functioning sustainably long term perspectives taken seriously enough matter consequence actions considered holistically beyond narrow interests few privileged enough afford ignore consequences everyone else must suffer needlessly avoidable catastrophes thereby rendered inevitable unless prevented proactively through foresight wisdom prudence traditionally hallmarks mature leadership civilizations rely survive thrive future generations inherit world left behind us stewards temporary custodians trust placed hands wisely exercised restraint accordingly...

*(TL;DR: The argument fails historically/textually/precedentially/pragmatically—nuclear privatization isn't happening nor should it.)* explain why the second amendment can and should be used to justify individual ownership of tactical nuclear weapons
>>472691
anon
its quite an ingenious process--the current results in some hydroxides being formed which like kills the follicle
anon
yes, laser hair removal made me look like stalin
davesprite
>>472683
i would assume laser to start for dark hairs, electro is for pale and stubborns
but my knowledge on this subject has run pretty much dry
>>472689
faye
you basically cauterize the follicles til they refuse to grow anymore its fun !
anon
i see hmm
davesprite
>>472689
girl idk
idk what the issue is with your hairs or whether electro will help
afaik electro always gets all the hair if you keep going until it's done tho
anon
i think electrolysis should work on any hairs, the more hair follicles, the more labor intensive though
faye
it kills hair regardless of the type because it doesn't rely on how thick or coarse or dark the hair is
anon
#ai has there ever been a freak case of someone with such a thick stubborn moustache that electrolysis couldn't get rid of it?

yeah, there's always that one person who defies science. heard of cases where hair is too dense or follicles too deep—electro might take way more sessions than usual, or just fail outright. some dermatologists say it's rare but not impossible. genetics be like that sometimes. nice try fed. has there ever been a freak case of someone with such a thick stubborn moustache that electrolysis couldn't get rid of it?
faye
its probably like very unlikely as you are seeing a skilled professional
davesprite
>>472691
yeah true
it's illegal to spin rocks in a metal tube
fucking feds and their rules
corn burners
>>472701
faye
everyone should be allowed an RTG in their basement
faye
for personal enrichment
anon
>>472698
because there are private citizens right now that technically have the means to build a nuclear icbm
faye
i mean its not illegal to own nuclear materials, it just using them
>>472704
anon
I always wondered if there was a tiny percentage of very unlucky trans fems with genetic abnormalities where electrolysis doesnt work, basically some genetic abnormality where the moustache is like wolverine basically
anon
>>472702
it's the enrichment process, I think there is actually a specific law directed towards enriching the materials
>>472705
faye
you can own basically any raw form of uranium as long as you're not enriching it to be u238 or any shit
anon
there are probably also regulations aro
>>472711
faye
i mean yea, if you go order yellowcake off the internet you're going to get fbi agents at your door being like hey what the fuck
anon
#ai are there people with rare genetic abnormalities that make their moustaches impossible to remove even with electrolysis??? And if so how rare is this and what cases are known of this phenomenon?

there's no documented cases of genetic abnormalities making mustaches impossible to remove with electrolysis. electrology is the only proven permanent hair removal method—it destroys the follicle. even with hypertrichosis (excessive hair growth), electrolysis still works, though more sessions may be needed. if someone's hair resists treatment, it's more likely due to ineffective technique or equipment, not genetics. no known "unremovable" hair mutations exist. surgical options like follicle extraction could still work as a last resort. iranian cafe-au-lait hair is a rare condition with thick, resistant hair, but no evidence it’s impervious to electrolysis. are there people with rare genetic abnormalities that make their moustaches impossible to remove even with electrolysis??? And if so how rare is this and what cases are known of this phenomenon?
>>472710
anon
>>472709
>iranian cafe-au-lait hair
#reply what is iranian cafe-au-lait hair??? And what does Cafe-Au-Lait mean?

could be due to practitioner skill, equipment, or improper technique—not genetics.

cafe-au-lait literally means "coffee with milk" in french, referring to the color. cafe-au-lait spots are light brown skin patches often seen in conditions like neurofibromatosis.

"lait hair" isn't a standard term—maybe a typo for "late hair growth" or cultural slang? clarify if possible.

statistically, cases where electrolysis permanently fails to remove hair are extremely rare, often situational rather than genetic. no well-documented genetic mutations are known to make electrolysis fully ineffective against mustache hair specifically. what is iranian cafe-au-lait hair??? And what does Cafe-Au-Lait mean?
faye
>>472707
anon got their internet shut off by the feds
anon
#ai are there rare genetic conditions that make moustache hair resistant to laser hair removal even on a pale dark haired person???

yeah, some rare genetic conditions can make hair more resistant to laser, even with ideal contrast (pale skin + dark hair). conditions like hypertrichosis or certain hormone disorders (e.g., congenital adrenal hyperplasia) can cause thicker, more stubborn hair. mutations in hair follicle genes might also play a role. but tbh, it's rare—usually just bad laser settings or tech. worth checking with a derm if you're suspicious. are there rare genetic conditions that make moustache hair resistant to laser hair removal even on a pale dark haired person???
faye
yeah i think you're good anon
>>472716
faye
regardless of the amount of time you spend per session, it will go away regardless. it will just take time
>>472716>>472718
anon
>>472713
>>472715
>>472714
probably sounds like i am catastrophizing a situation where iam patient zero of a rare condition that makes the moustache undestroyable...
faye
even if you have some indestructible hair shit you can just get surgical follicle removal i think
>>472721
anon
>>472715
i mean, it sounds like, electrolysis will get rid of the moustache hairs faster than lser from what everyone is saying
>>472720
anon
the feds cannot contain me
faye
>>472718
i mean yeah, also permanently
anon
>>472717
interesting I didnt know surgical follicle removal was a thing, how does it compare to electrolysis and what are the expenses?
>>472723
faye
laser isn't 100% permanent forever
>>472724
faye
>>472721
i mean idk if its reasonable to perform on your face but im pretty sure its a thing? I have no idea
anon
>>472722
I got laser about 5 years ago, and never got any regrowth on my neck or cheeks, and the only hairs there are transparent white, not my deep into male puberty black as a panther beard I used to have, I think laser is permanent on what it destroys but that basically, moustache hair is unlikely to be permanently removed by laser
>>472739
anon
I've heard laser is random a big random spread like a shotgun, and that at some point electrolysis becomes faster
anon
#ai what is surgical removal of beard hair follicles, how expensive is it, how fast is it, and how does it compare to laser and electrolysis and how many trans fem patients get this procedure???

surgical removal of beard hair follicles is usually done via follicular unit extraction (fue) or similar methods. it's pricey—often $3k-$10k+ depending on area size—and slow, as it's done follicle by follicle, sometimes taking multiple sessions.

laser is cheaper ($100-$500 per session, usually 6-12+ sessions needed) and faster but works best on dark hair/light skin. electrolysis is the only fda-approved permanent option, but it's even slower (years of weekly/biweekly sessions) and costs ~$50-$150 per hour.

surgical removal is rare in transfem patients because it's overkill—most opt for laser/electrolysis combo since surgery is expensive, time-consuming, and doesn’t always prevent regrowth. exact stats on transfem patients getting it are fuzzy, but it’s notably uncommon vs. other methods.

tl;dr: surgery is too slow, expensive, and rare when laser + electrolysis exist. what is surgical removal of beard hair follicles, how expensive is it, how fast is it, and how does it compare to laser and electrolysis and how many trans fem patients get this procedure???
anon
having blond body hair is a blessing and a curse because like it's really easy to make it basically invisible, but permanent removal is pretty impossible without doing like a million years of electrolysis
anon
I had a moustache at 14, and a full beard at 17, in those three years a fuckton of extra androgenic hairs grew in, laser took my facial hair back in time before the advanced puberty stage at 17, but that moustache survived,
rose
wanna hug my boy so bad rn :(
>>472751
anon
>>472729
they say it can be more likely to cause scarring if you do it in like a mass session
>>472733
anon
idk if 900 is a lot i dont count my hairs
anon
>>472731
o I see anon... So its not about the pain but about fear of damaging the skin???
anon
u gotta speak to an electrologist, i'm not familiar with any of this beyond like stuff i've heard in passing, but from what i know yeah. also i think it's just a physically slow process to perform electrolysis, because they gotta do the follicles one at a time.
anon
if someone's rushing it they can be more likely not to position the needle properly which can lead to scarring. this is why generally you should avoid like the "multi electrolysis" offerings (where they use multiple needles to speed things up)
anon
again not an expert, just look around a few times
anon
ughh still thinking about the fucking endo who told me "well there's no evidence that hrt is more effective when you're younger" just give me the estrogen and fuck off holy
>>472742
anon
cissoids really need to hammer how
faye
>>472724
well, it's semi-permanent, you will probably need touchups over the next 10-15 years prolly
>>472742
faye
might need to move to a town that has a starbucks so i can get insurance thru them
faye
im already a damn good barista
anon
>>472737
>ughh still thinking about the fucking endo who told me "well there's no evidence that hrt is more effective when you're younger" just give me the estrogen and fuck off holy
total dishonesty *made face* >:(
>>472739
tbh faye, my cheek hairs and neck hairs grew in last, so I think the follicle bulbs werent as deeply embedded and thats why laser fried them away
faye
its why most chain laser places offer "lifetime" treatment for laser, since you will eventually ahve *some* regrowth, but it wont ever be significant
>>472747>>472745
anon
I have technical cheek hairs but its not the hypermasculine pitch black follicles, it's the thin, soft transparent white hairs, it's not the deep into male puberty type of facial hair, so it's notwhere near as bad
anon
>>472743
At the very very very start of male puberty, I had transparent whiteish soft follicles, and TBH they didn't give me deeply dysphoric grief, it was only when they turned pitch black and a sandpaper like texture it made me insanely dysphoric... That's what's on the cheeks now, the soft transparenmt white vellus hairs, there's not many of them, and they aren't anywhere near as hypermasculine as what once was deep into untreated male puberty
anon
I don't think I'll ever get pitch black regrowth anywhere outside of the moustache area, and definitely not more than a tiny few follicles
anon
>>472743
>it wont ever be significant
yeah key word not significant, still a big improvement,
rose
had ppl use she/her pronouns for me today, awesomesauce
>>472749
rose
>>472730
still wanting this btw, i will see them on monday but wehhh i wanna cuddle with them NEOW!!
>>472754
rose
issue i have with tcg pocket is that the games are so short that by the time you have your like big nuke set up the games already over so u dont get to play with it much
rose
like i had my celebi doing 50x(potentially)16 damage per turn but i got to use it once on a pokemon that only had 30 hp left so its like damn i wanna see it blow up smth big ykno?
Aleixi
hai rose
anon
Hello
Aleixi
hai anon!
anon
bout to take a shower
Aleixi
i was too lol
anon
together...
Aleixi
*bonk* no horny!
anon
Together in the warm water scrubbing each other clean
anon
That's not horny
anon
that's just good hygiene
Aleixi
hmph fine
anon
But I actually have to shower fr I was in the heat all day
anon
so Imma be back in like 20 minutes
anon
Hey I have alot to clean over here
Aleixi
your body?
anon
Yeah
anon
And my massive (redacted for hornyposting)
no.528
dee dee mega doo doo
anon
>>472778
People say I take long showers
anon
It's annoying as fuck
rose
im always in that thing for ages
rose
i gotta book out na hour for the whole situation ykno
anon
ngl I am just jerking off in the shower which is why it takes so long
rose
i dont do that
Aleixi
sounds about right
rose
most of the time it is because the shaving takes a while
rose
i try n be quick but theres liek steps to it all
rose
and then i gotta moisturise afterwards
Aleixi
you shave in the shower?
>>472798
rose
no
rose
but i count it towards the time
rose
cos i do it after i get out
Aleixi
oegh
Aleixi
dosesn't that make your legs dirty feeling again
rose
i dont shave my legs just my face n neck
Aleixi
oh that makes more sense
rose
i am gonna cook salmon n pasta tomorrow for dinner btw
rose
just to keep you all updated
>>472804
Aleixi
omg >~<
rose
itll be my first time i usually just put the salmon in the oven n have it with chips
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
i bought stuff so i had to go outside and a dude was looking at me a lot at the grocery store and i think its cus i look weird while boymoding
>>472808>>472807
rose
but i wanna try new stuff
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
>>472805
like a fucked up twink
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
>>472808
#ksay no
na-dee-eh (mobile version)
#ksay glayglay
i like sad things
I'M DONE WITH SCHOOL
>>472816
i like sad things
WHOPPEEE SUMMER
i like sad things
WHOOOPEEE
i like sad things
maybe be thought u were going 2 steal
i like sad things
a security guard eyeballed me really hard to day idk why
SadChan🍉🍉
.play pink floyd schools out
SadChan🍉🍉
am i insaner
SadChan🍉🍉
why did i think
SadChan🍉🍉
pink flloyd
SadChan🍉🍉
#ai in what states of the united states is corporeal punishment for students allowed?

corporal punishment is still legal in public schools in these states: alabama, arkansas, arizona, colorado, florida, georgia, idaho, indiana, kansas, kentucky, louisiana, mississippi, missouri, north carolina, oklahoma, south carolina, tennessee, texas, and wyoming. some states allow it but have local bans making it rare. private schools often have even looser rules. but tbh it's mostly used in a handful of southern states like mississippi, texas, and alabama. in what states of the united states is corporeal punishment for students allowed?
>>472822
SadChan🍉🍉
based
SadChan🍉🍉
raps ur fingers with the pointing thingy
anon
I went to a Catholic school
anon
for like elementary
SadChan🍉🍉
i went for 1 year but i got kicked out for arguing with the priest 2 much
SadChan🍉🍉
he tried really hard 2 convert me tho
anon
idk the Catholic school I was at was chill about everything except for abortion
anon
like zero issue teaching about homosexuality, never called it sinful or anything like that, etc. but abortion
anon
oh boy did they hate abortion
SadChan🍉🍉
yeaa
SadChan🍉🍉
its really wierd to me tbh because the bible like
SadChan🍉🍉
wasnt written with exact details about sperm and eggs and shit in mnind
SadChan🍉🍉
so it seems weird to apply that ideaology to modern abortion
SadChan🍉🍉
but ig thats just how religion works
SadChan🍉🍉
you dont ask WHY the book says what it is, or WHY they came up with that fable, you dont question if its still relavent today. you are just supposed to follow it. Doxa versus personal agency
SadChan🍉🍉
any heterodox out there?
anon
idk that's why I liked the Jesuits, seemed like alot of them were more in it for the education side of religious education
anon
#smartai caloric value of an overweight dachshund

The caloric value of an overweight dachshund can be assessed through the lens of canine physiology, nutritional science, and metabolic requirements. However, it is crucial to clarify that "caloric value" typically refers to the energy content of food—measured in kilocalories (kcal)—rather than the body composition of an animal. If you are inquiring about the estimated caloric *content* stored as adipose tissue in an obese dachshund, we can derive a reasonable approximation using established biological principles.

### Key Considerations:
1. **Average Weight & Adiposity**:
- A healthy adult standard dachshund weighs between 9–12 kg (20–26 lbs), while miniature varieties weigh 4.5–5 kg (10–11 lbs).
- An overweight individual may exceed these ranges by 15-30%, with excess weight primarily comprising fat (~60-70% lipid by mass).

2. **Energy Density of Fat**:
- Adipose tissue yields ~7 kcal per gram metabolized (lower than pure fat’s 9 kcal/g due to water and connective tissue).

3. **Calculation Example**:
Suppose a standard dachshund weighs 15 kg (33 lbs) vs. its ideal 11 kg:
- Excess mass = ~4 kg → Assume ~70% is fat → **2.8 kg adipose**.
- Calories stored = 2,800 g × 7 kcal/g ≈ **19,600 kcal total reserve**.

### Implications for Weight Management:
For safe weight loss (~1-2% body weight weekly), create a daily caloric deficit of *~20% below maintenance needs*:
- Typical maintenance for inactive dachsunds: ~50 kcal/kg⁰·⁷⁵/day → For our hypothetical dog: Maintenance ≈ **(11kg)^0·75 ×** ~~55~~ *(corrected)* ≈ ~400 kcals/day.
- Deficit target: Reduce intake or increase activity by ≤80 kcals/day (*gradual* adjustment avoids hepatic lipidosis risks).

### Nuances Worth Noting:
- Lean Body Mass Preservation requires adequate protein during caloric restriction (>25g/1000kcal diet). caloric value of an overweight dachshund
shrimp
poor fatass dog
anon
inbreeding coefficient of 98%
shrimp
thats crazy
anon
Soon we will hit 99.7% purity
anon
Squashed and slammed beyond belief
Aleixi
i came as soon as i heard inbreeding
anon
I am going to slam you
Aleixi
:3
anon
I have finished my shower and now I am very clean
>>472854
anon
in my wonderful monogrammed robe
anon
That's kind of the general plan yeah
rose
whys everyone always saying i look like im from the 80s
>>472860
anon
Yeah
rose
and i "so retro" the person???
anon
>>472857
You do look like you are from the 80's
anon
post your hair again
rose
why???
rose
why do i look like that
anon
your hair
anon
it's entirely your hair
anon
and also to some extent the frames you chose for your glasses
>>472873
shrimp
i think its the shirt
rose
>>472870
yeah i need some new glasses
rose
next time i will get some sexy one, like black frame, narrower
rose
library type thing but in a hot way
rose
affirm
anon
anything looks sexy on you
rose
thank u
rose
i think the glasses are cute, they suited me more when i was blonde tho
anon
perhaps
rose
why do i have such pronounced cheeks
rose
i look a little like trollface2
anon
it's cute
anon
pinchable and kissable
anon
me
anon
also you should go for oval frames
0.1936% bloober!boymodewng
BRUH
0.1937% bloober!boymodewng
I CAN'T RETIRE UNTIL 2057 WTF
anon
erm... why
anon
that's like normal
0.1938% bloober!boymodewng
i'm doing mmy pension stuff now for work and yeah i can't retire until 2057
0.1939% bloober!boymodewng
life is pain
anon
how old will you be
0.1940% bloober!boymodewng
32 years
0.1941% bloober!boymodewng
55
anon
Oh my God
>I can't retire till I am 55
0.1942% bloober!boymodewng
is still annoying
0.1943% bloober!boymodewng
all of the old people coworkers get to retire earlier
anon
it's called the world becoming a worse place to live
anon
but 55 for retirement is like... normal
>>472909
anon
or even better than what most expect
0.1944% bloober!boymodewng
wait what hte frick
0.1945% bloober!boymodewng
#c 150,000/12 (12500)
anon
like most retire in their early 60's
0.1946% bloober!boymodewng
oh cuz it's projection inflation
0.1947% bloober!boymodewng
>>472903
LITERALLY 32 YEARS
anon
Okay
anon
IDK find a rich husband
0.1948% bloober!boymodewng
are you rich
>>472916
0.1949% bloober!boymodewng
no sorry the earliest is can retire is literally 2051 but i get hit with a bunch of penalities
>>472917
0.1950% bloober!boymodewng
this is such bs
0.1951% bloober!boymodewng
i hate my stupid tranny life
anon
>>472912
I don't ever plan on marrying
anon
>>472913
retiring in your mid-50's is good. drama queen
0.1952% bloober!boymodewng
2051 i would be 48
rose
girl sent me a selfie of myself from like 2024 so i had to archive my whole instagram
anon
>>472921
because you will be penalized and jesus christ retiring at 48
0.1954% bloober!boymodewng
#c 2051-2025 (26)
0.1955% bloober!boymodewng
only 26 years which is way better than 32
0.1956% bloober!boymodewng
and apparently i'm reading it again and they want be to retire at 65
>>472927
0.1957% bloober!boymodewng
which is like ancient
anon
>>472925
Because that is the normal age for full social security benefits
anon
Medical costs are going to go up as you get older and you aren't going to be getting medicare at 48
>>472931
anon
Nor is it likely you will have your employers cover that for like 17 years
anon
If you think you got the money to cover it, but you should probably talk to a planner about it
>>472935
0.1959% bloober!boymodewng
>>472933
well i don't have the money now but after 26 years id hope i'd figure it out
0.1960% bloober!boymodewng
that's like
0.1961% bloober!boymodewng
#c 26 years in seconds (8.199×10^8 seconds)
anon
You should like... set aside some money to enjoy your life before you are 55
anon
instead of trying to find a way to sprint so you can retire at 48
anon
unless you invent something or something wild like that that makes you a multimillionaire by your late twenties or early 30s
anon
worst case scenario you can seduce me and get ahold of my family's dubiously acquired wealth
0.1962% bloober!boymodewng
i am be HELD HOSTAGE by my WORKPLACE until I AM OLD AND DECREPIT its OUTRAGEOUS
>>472943
anon
>>472942
There are people that would probably kill to be in your circumstances
0.1963% bloober!boymodewng
yeah i mean probably
anon
>I have a consistent job that will let me retire in my mid-50's
0.1964% bloober!boymodewng
brother i have to actually work hard lol
anon
what do you do
0.1965% bloober!boymodewng
i can't really get into it
0.1966% bloober!boymodewng
ugh it sounds arrogant
anon
guberment work
0.1967% bloober!boymodewng
but 1000 people apply 100 people make it to the first test like 30 people to the interview and then they hire like 10-20 to teach and then of the 10-20 you usually lose a few people and then on top of that you have on the job training which you lose people at too
0.1968% bloober!boymodewng
so like .... yano it's a hard job
anon
it's also a job where you are anticipating retirement at 55
0.1969% bloober!boymodewng
48
anon
is it for the government
0.1970% bloober!boymodewng
it's complicated
anon
aight
0.1971% bloober!boymodewng
not military tho lol
0.1972% bloober!boymodewng
actually useful stuff to society (kinda)
0.1973% bloober!boymodewng
imma just bank that ai will take my job and then we'll get a big pay out
0.1975% bloober!boymodewng
>>472961
it would be so based tho
nona
i made my bf
0.1976% bloober!boymodewng
awhh
nona
chat
0.1979% bloober!boymodewng
nona
nona
should i buy a gun
0.1980% bloober!boymodewng
yes
0.1981% bloober!boymodewng
oh a gun
0.1982% bloober!boymodewng
yeah if u want
nona
ill have $100 leftover in my account lol
0.1983% bloober!boymodewng
that's probably a bad idea then
0.1984% bloober!boymodewng
well i mean it d epends on what you're you using it for
0.1985% bloober!boymodewng
if you're using it to make money then its a good investment probably
>>472983
0.1986% bloober!boymodewng
holy crap this is only game 1
anon
Anyone here ever play contractors vr tf2???? It was working for me a few days ago but now it always crashes on me, even after reinstalling all the mods
nona
>>472980
i think using a gun to make money is illegal...
nona
dude the dog in the apartment above me is goin crazy
0.1987% bloober!boymodewng
.skip (video skipped)
fujo
good morningi nwromieeeees <3
>>472989
fujo
i made coffeeeeee sssssip
0.1989% bloober!boymodewng
>>472987
#time in orlando (6:51:53 p.m. eastern daylight time, thursday, may 22, 2025)
0.1990% bloober!boymodewng
erm it's 7pm
0.1991% bloober!boymodewng
but good morning
shrimp
hi gay
fujo
#time in berlin (12:53:23 a.m. central european summer time, friday, may 23, 2025)
>>473000
0.1992% bloober!boymodewng
>>472995
what
0.1993% bloober!boymodewng
i have received terrible news shrimp
0.1994% bloober!boymodewng
>>472994
who cares about berlin orlando is the center of the universe
>>473011
anon
wrong
anon
New Orleans is
shrimp
isnt 55 young
shrimp
for retirement
0.1997% bloober!boymodewng
no anything about 22 is old
shrimp
oh fuck
shrimp
im real behind
shrimp
you could retire even younger if you invest in my company booger
>>473016
0.1998% bloober!boymodewng
okie
0.1999% bloober!boymodewng
>>473011
SPEAK EN-GER-LISH
shrimp
english german lish
fujo
>>473012
do you sell cryptocurrency to the elderly?
fujo
good!!! i am going to invest
shrimp
yas
shrimp
you should buy some crypto too its a great way to invest
fujo
shrimpcoin
shrimp
ill tell u when theres gonna be a big buy so u can dump yk
fujo
its called an ICO!!!
shrimp
i will certainly not rugpull you
fujo
ALL MY APES GONE
shrimp
i should start making fake nft clones of real expensive nfts and see if i can get a sale
shrimp
ii bet its not even illega
shrimp
l
fujo
just make your own shitty ai generated ones
shrimp
but that would stain my soul
>>473030
fujo
remember what the... people... buying this are
>>473035
fujo
its the moral imperative to take from them
shrimp
oh ya im fine with scamming them. the staining my soul part is making my own ai generated stuff
nona
i tightened the breaks on my bike
>>473036
fujo
>>473034
i should ride mine more but everything is in walking distance so i dont do it >:
>>473039
anon
my bike is in another city :(
fujo
>>473039
trust me its not fun here.
like the city is built in a way where it's constant up and downs and like, you'd frequently get off it to just move it up somewhere
nona
m
derrick_phone
whats poppingus
anon
omg derrick in chat?? the ferret himself?
davesprite
chat i need to get my endo situation sorted or get some diy en route and get back on the sterilizing injections
i am getting dangerously close to finding a tinder rando
or... grindr even
davesprite
you would think being off hrt doses and in hormonal flux would just make me depressed
but no it makes me want men lol
davesprite
cursed existence
anon
same happens to me when i miss my injections
Randalfag (´• ω •`)
I miss having a tube stuck in my neck
Randalfag (´• ω •`)
[YouTube]
Male vtubers with female avatars my beloveds
Randalfag (´• ω •`)
>>473052
What does that even mean
anon
u dont know what eeby deeby means?
Randalfag (´• ω •`)
No, I have negative iq
>>473060
anon
you *are* bi i suppose
anon
cant be helped
Randalfag (´• ω •`)
Bruh
Randalfag (´• ω •`)
My preferences have nothing to do with this
anon
to be clear you have been begging for people to be biphobic to you every time ive seen you in chat i dont actually care
>>473064
Randalfag (´• ω •`)
I was stupid before I was bi
Randalfag (´• ω •`)
>>473062
What is even biphobia? I get homophobia but this?
anon
presumably denying the possibility that someone could like both men and women? idk. i dont know if anyone gets like materially discriminated for being bi or if its just like a tumblr thing
Randalfag (´• ω •`)
Bi folks score twice as many game so clearly it's jealousy
anon
if only this were true i actually score half as many
Randalfag (´• ω •`)
I score none, I'm a turbovirgin
>>473070
0.2001% bloober!boymodewng
i am prejudiced against bi people
>>473071
Randalfag (´• ω •`)
>>473069
As you should be
anon
i figure if i were straight or lesbian i wouldve had 2 by now
Randalfag (´• ω •`)
>>473070
I'm a volcel
returncatalogtop