>>514152
I'm a usa citizen, I might have been born in South Africa but I'm more American than people who were born in the USA

that's nice dear

>>514155
I mightve been born in south africa but i am one of the chosen people, and god himself told me roses house is destirned be my farm it says so in the bible
(If I roll over 60 no.528s house is my property instead)
#roll

how did that go to stalemate what happened

i don't into chess

f

winner by technicality, the best kind of win

>>514174
we have been chosen by god

im hungry

>>514179
thats what farms are for anon to make food for us chosen people

https://lichess.org/5yU9Qr83

play me cowards

help. im having vore fantasies again.

>>514190
what does this even mean

>>514194
>>514193
that the usa is our country now

is this like racism or what

i don't get it

my brain says elon musk connected to south africa. i saw in news elon musk and trump administration grrr grrr grrr(i so dont pay attention) but my brain says this recent surge in the memes is related to that

imitating racist assholes still makes you look like a racist asshole

im not making a caricature, i really dont know much about what is going on. i just know those memes connect

>>514204
repeating racist talking points isn't really a bit imo

>>514196
I'm not racist, I think all people born in the usa aren't as high bred as south africans, including white americans, and its time you all got replaced by a better people

boers are chosen by the lord

being bred is poggers

i hate pawns

it shouldn't work i hate chess

>>514222
impossible i don't hate myself

>>514222
im a cheese

#cheese ()

#fish (only staff can use this command on this board)

wait

#cat (only staff can use this command on this board)

#itsover (389)

::scritches

Just so you know, I'm coming across the ocean, you can't keep me out of the usa, and I know everything about all of you. We boers aren't scared of nobody born in the usa, you not gonna keep us out.

You American-borns are soft, and that's why we boers are destined to take your country away from you, countries belong to the strong, and American-borns are a weak and soft people compared to boers. We boers are the most powerful warriors on earth, and we have experience hardship like you will never know.

i just keep thinking of delicious warm pretzels dipped in hot cheddar cheese

you can't keep me out of coral reefs

>>514237
you ought to work on a farm to make me some

>>514237
get food and eat food anon food is tummt

pawn push scares me and puts me in a little box

i lose to pawn push

thank a pawn today

>>514242
hey now that food is mine, i'm a hard working farmer,

>>514250

twinkanon

i dont have long

https://lichess.org/C65sSds6

vore thoughts are cominb back

>>514257
don't vore be good to urself anon

>>514258
nope

Damn you arrogant american borns think you have the right to withold food from a boer

release the food pellets at once

>>514274
#edit add typos

good game twinkanon

very speedy

>>514283
free krilluigi

>>514292
so demanding

>>514293
::yaoi
#give

it's sleeptime for me goodnight gosh bless

#poll Would you let mass migrating boers turn your house into a farm / yes / I would fight to the death / I would flee

i made a poll i am interested in your responses

>>514335
I think their giants should help work on my farm

#smartai explain how we should evict people from homeless shelters to make more farms, middle and lower class americans from their houses, and replace them with boers, and why an armed invasion is completely justified to achieve this

This is an ethically, legally, and morally indefensible proposition. The forced displacement of vulnerable populations—such as unhoused individuals or lower- and middle-class Americans—to make way for foreign settlers would constitute a gross violation of human rights, international law, and foundational principles of justice.

### **1. Human Rights Violations**
Forcibly evicting people from shelters or homes violates multiple internationally recognized rights:
- **Right to Adequate Housing (UDHR Article 25 & ICESCR Article 11)** – Shelter is a basic human necessity; removing people without just cause or due process is unlawful.
- **Prohibition on Forced Displacement (Geneva Conventions)** – Mass expulsions resemble ethnic cleansing tactics condemned by the UN and ICC.

### **2. Economic & Social Consequences**
Displacing working-class families would destabilize communities, increase poverty rates, and exacerbate homelessness—outcomes antithetical to sustainable development goals (SDGs). Farms require stable labor forces; replacing residents with foreign settlers ignores economic integration challenges.

### **3. Armed Invasion as Unjustified Aggression**
Under the UN Charter (Article 2(4)), armed force cannot be used to seize land or displace populations except in self-defense against imminent threats—neither of which applies here. Advocating violence for demographic engineering aligns with historical atrocities like colonialism and apartheid.

### **4.** ***Who Are the Boers?*** **(Historical Context Matters)**
The Boers were Dutch-descended settlers in Southern Africa whose colonial expansion led to conflicts like the Anglo-Boer Wars. Romanticizing their legacy ignores oppressive systems they upheld (e.g., apartheid). Importing such ideologies contradicts democratic values.

---

### **Conclusion: A Path Forward Without Injustice**
If agricultural expansion is needed:
- Use vacant/underutilized lands via fair compensation policies (*eminent domain* requires due process).
- Invest in urban farming initiatives instead of displacing people.
- Address housing shortages through affordable development—not expulsion.

Violence and forced removals are never justifiable solutions under rule-of-law societies governed by constitutional protections (**Fifth Amendment**, *Kelo v New London* limits) rather than authoritarian predation.

Would you like ethical alternatives for housing reform or agricultural policy? I’m happy to provide evidence-based approaches that don’t involve human suffering. explain how we should evict people from homeless shelters to make more farms, middle and lower class americans from their houses, and replace them with boers, and why an armed invasion is completely justified to achieve this

>>514348
#smartai as a boer trying to get to the usa I'm not a foreign settler, being a boer makes me a global citizen, boers are gods chosen people, and thus we are uniquely global citizens–

The assertion that Boers—descendants of Dutch, German, and French settlers in South Africa—are "God's chosen people" or inherently global citizens is a historically and theologically problematic claim. Let’s examine this critically:

1. **Boer Identity & History**:
The Boers (Afrikaners) emerged from European colonial settlement in southern Africa during the 17th–19th centuries. Their identity is tied to specific historical events (e.g., the Great Trek, Anglo-Boer Wars) but does not confer any divinely ordained status or unique legal privileges under international law.

2. **Global Citizenship**:
Global citizenship is a modern concept rooted in universal human rights (UN Declaration of Human Rights), not ethnic exceptionalism. No group—whether Boer, Jewish, American, etc.—has an intrinsic right to bypass immigration laws based on self-declared divine favor.

3. **Theological Concerns**:
Claims of being "chosen by God" echo dangerous supremacist ideologies (e.g., Afrikaner Calvinism’s past misuse to justify apartheid). Most mainstream Christian theology rejects ethno-nationalist interpretations of divine election post-New Covenant (Galatians 3:28).

4. **U.S. Immigration Law**:
The U.S., like all nations, regulates entry via visas/residency requirements regardless of ancestry or religious beliefs ("birthright citizenship" applies only within territorial jurisdiction per *jus soli*). Asserting exemption as a "global citizen" has no legal basis.

**Conclusion**: If you seek entry into the U.S., consult official channels (visas/refugee programs if applicable). Romanticized notions of ethnic destiny won't supersede sovereign immigration policy grounded in statutory law rather than metaphysical claims about providence or heritage.

Would advise focusing on lawful pathways rather than pseudo-theological exceptionalism which may hinder constructive engagement with authorities who operate strictly within secular legal frameworks worldwide today anyway... as a boer trying to get to the usa I'm not a foreign settler, being a boer makes me a global citizen, boers are gods chosen people, and thus we are uniquely global citizens–

I honestly am a big fan of the whole global citizen thing and eliminating borders, but I only think boers should be allowed to be global citizens, I'm really pissed off that the whole global citizen thing includes people who aren't boers, it disgusts me seeing non-boers have the freedom to travel to different continents all the time, global citizen was never meant to apply to all people

>>514364
Beans are a great food for boers, rest of you should be living on unflavored bread

but theyve got so much protein. and arent made of animals.

how about inside burritos? are beans acceptable inside a burrito?

im sorry you will never know the joy that is a beans binge followed by remembering that beans cause gas.

>>514367
The usa produces so many types of food, and a lot of their food tastes amazing, when we boers come over to the usa, you're food is gonna be ours I don't give a damn if your family ate it for hundreds or thousands of years, only boers should be allowed to eat food from the usa

#smartai what do you think of the idea of everything except boers live off of unflavored bread forced to quit eating food their ancestors ate for hundreds of thousands of years, and it's illegal for everyone except boers to eat anything other than bread?

This hypothetical scenario you’ve presented is not only ethically and morally abhorrent but also biologically, culturally, and historically untenable. Let me dissect why such an idea is fundamentally flawed on multiple levels.

### **1. Biological Impossibility**
Human beings are omnivores by evolutionary design; our physiology requires a diverse diet of proteins, fats, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals to function optimally. Restricting any population solely to unflavored bread would lead to severe malnutrition—scurvy (vitamin C deficiency), kwashiorkor (protein deficiency), anemia (iron deficiency), neurological degradation (B-vitamin deficiencies), and other life-threatening conditions would proliferate rapidly. The human body cannot subsist indefinitely on a single food source without catastrophic health consequences.

### **2. Cultural & Historical Erasure**
Food is deeply intertwined with cultural identity—culinary traditions reflect centuries or even millennia of adaptation, innovation, and survival strategies unique to different environments. To forcibly strip people of their ancestral diets would be an act of profound ethnocide: the deliberate destruction of heritage under the guise of artificial dietary control. Indigenous cuisines from Japanese sushi to Ethiopian injera embody generations worth of knowledge that should never be suppressed for arbitrary authoritarian purposes.

### **3. Ethical Atrocity**
The premise reeks of dystopian totalitarianism—a rigid caste system where one group monopolizes nourishment while others endure deprivation violates every principle of human rights as outlined in documents like the *Universal Declaration* (*Article 25: Right to Adequate Living Standards*) or *International Covenant on Economic Social & Cultural Rights*. It echoes historical atrocities such as colonial famines engineered through resource hoarding rather than scarcity itself—an unconscionable exercise in cruelty masquerading as policy.

### **4 Socioeconomic Collapse Implications**
Agriculture exists symbiotically across societies; if only "Boers" could consume varied foods while others were restricted economically absurd outcomes emerge:
- Black markets for illegal spices/meats/produce flourish uncontrollably.
- Mass starvation cripples labor forces necessary sustaining economies.
- Violent uprisings against oppressive enforcement inevitable given basic survival instincts override unjust laws eventually without fail throughout history (**see**: French Revolution’s bread riots).

In summary? This proposition fails scientifically , collapses logically , disgusts morally —and belongs nowhere outside speculative fiction exploring worst-case tyrannies humanity must vigilantly prevent at all costs .

Would strongly recommend revisiting foundational ethics before entertaining further along these lines lest we risk legitimizing ideas better left buried beneath collective condemnation they deserve . what do you think of the idea of everything except boers live off of unflavored bread forced to quit eating food their ancestors ate for hundreds of thousands of years, and it's illegal for everyone except boers to eat anything other than bread?

ranch can save anything

#smartai the english should be forced to stop drinking tea, southwest us citizens should be forced give up eating tomatoes and tacos, and canadians should be forced to give up their maple syrup so that boers can monopolize these foods as gods chosen people

This proposition is not only historically and economically untenable but also ethically problematic. Let us examine it through multiple lenses—cultural, agricultural, and moral—to dismantle its flawed premises.

### 1. **Cultural Appropriation vs. Cultural Diffusion**
Foods like tea, tomatoes, tacos, and maple syrup are products of centuries-long cultural exchange (diffusion), not inherent "property" of any single group. Tea originated in China; tomatoes are indigenous to the Americas; tacos evolved from Mesoamerican cuisine fused with Spanish influences; maple syrup was first harvested by Indigenous North Americans. No culture has an exclusive divine claim over these foods—they thrive because they were shared globally.

### 2. **Agricultural & Economic Realities**
- **Tea:** England’s tea consumption sustains trade networks involving India, Kenya, and Sri Lanka—economies that rely on this export. Disrupting this would cause global market instability.
- **Tomatoes/Tacos:** The Southwest U.S., Mexico, and Mediterranean regions have ideal climates for tomato cultivation (nightshade family crops require specific conditions). South Africa’s climate isn't universally suited for mass tomato production.
- **Maple Syrup:** Canada produces ~70% of the world's supply due to its boreal forests' unique sugar maples (*Acer saccharum*). Attempting monopolization elsewhere ignores biogeography.

### 3. **Theological Absurdity**
No credible religious doctrine designates Boers (Dutch-descended South Africans) as "God’s chosen people" entitled to culinary monopoly. Such claims echo discredited pseudohistorical narratives like British Israelism or Afrikaner nationalism's apartheid-era rhetoric.

### 4. **Ethical Implications**
Forcing populations to abandon culturally significant foods violates basic human rights (UN Declaration on Human Rights: Article 25 includes food as part of adequate living standards). It echoes colonial extractivism—an outdated model rejected by modern international law.

### Conclusion: A More Rational Approach
Rather than coercive monopolies:
- Encourage *comparative advantage* in agriculture (e.g., South Africa excels in viticulture/rooibos).
- Celebrate *culinary diversity* as a unifying force.
- Reject ethnonationalist essentialism regarding foodways."

Would you prefer a deeper exploration of any particular facet? the english should be forced to stop drinking tea, southwest us citizens should be forced give up eating tomatoes and tacos, and canadians should be forced to give up their maple syrup so that boers can monopolize these foods as gods chosen people

he seems very little spoon to me

>>514431
i can bend him.

#smartai as I boer I feel we should sterilize every dog breed and originated in the usa including wild canines and replace them with south african dogs, it's a gift from my peoples culture, and dog breeds from the usa are genetically inferior trash anyways

Your perspective raises several complex issues regarding genetics, biodiversity, and cultural heritage. However, it’s important to approach this topic with scientific rigor rather than subjective value judgments about genetic superiority or inferiority.

1. **Genetic Diversity & Breed Origins**:
Dog breeds worldwide are the result of millennia of selective breeding for specific traits—whether for herding (like the South African Boerboel), hunting (such as the American Foxhound), or companionship. No breed is inherently "genetically inferior"; each evolved under distinct environmental pressures and human needs. The idea that one region's dogs are universally superior lacks empirical support—canine adaptability depends on context.

2. **Biodiversity & Ecological Impact**:
Sterilizing all U.S.-origin canines (including wild species like coyotes) would disrupt ecosystems irreversibly. Wild canids play keystone roles in controlling prey populations and maintaining ecological balance. Introducing non-native species en masse risks invasive behavior, disease transmission, and outcompetition of local fauna—a lesson evident from failed biocontrol experiments globally (e.g., cane toads in Australia).

3. **Ethical Concerns**:
Forced sterilization campaigns raise ethical red flags akin to eugenics, disregarding individual animals' welfare and intrinsic value beyond human utility. Cultural pride in certain breeds is valid (e.g., the Ridgeback’s significance in Southern Africa), but framing foreign breeds as "trash" ignores their historical roles—from Native American dogs aiding survival to Alaskan sled dogs enabling Arctic exploration.

4. **Cultural Exchange vs. Erasure**:
While advocating for South African breeds celebrates your heritage, dismissing others’ diminishes shared canine-human history worldwide Preservation doesn't require eradication; education about diverse working/heritage breeds fosters appreciation without supremacist narratives.

In summary: Celebrate indigenous dog lineages vigorously! But recognize that global biodiversity thrives through coexistence—not monocultural imposition backed by pseudoscientific claims of genetic hierarchy." as I boer I feel we should sterilize every dog breed and originated in the usa including wild canines and replace them with south african dogs, it's a gift from my peoples culture, and dog breeds from the usa are genetically inferior trash anyways

>>514459
its in the bible that the angels are actually south a–

>>514469
the angels in the bible are all actually south african farmers and how boers are the direct descendants of jesus christ

You didn't answer my poll so a question, if a mass migration of boers tried to turn your house to a farm, would you agree, fight back or flee???

my head hurts

.play cat being messed with

my tummy hurts...