>>753225
you know what, I'm not even going to make the obvious joke

>>753230
Because I assume this is a violation of revenge porn laws

>>753232
those are fighting words

>>753232
hm?

Yeah, I mean, I'm just fucking around.

>>753236
It's funny how hard history was rewritten on twitter "censoring" the Hunter Biden laptop story because they were taking down thousands of photos of Hunter Biden's cock because surprise surprise posting revenge porn on twitter is against their rules and leaves them open for lawsuit

>>753241
Oh boy, well that's a tough one to answer. I think that with foreign policy, you often do kind of have to set aside your sort of personal domestic issues and identity. Like uh... you'll often find that abroad alot of people do not adhere to Western values. You look at something like uh, for a less controversial example, Rwanda invading the DRC, and it's just the most brutal insane shit, where the DRC is trying to protect people who committed a genocide but you have to ultimately set that horrible behavior aside because at the moment Rwanda is doing some fucked up shit. That being said, I do think that controversially on the I-P issue, admitting "hey I don't know much about this, so I don't have an opinion" is perfectly valid. Which i think the sort of "both these groups are shitty" is an extension of in its own way.

>>753241
I don't really know. Especially given that both governments have committed their fair share of crimes against humanity.

.play somewhere in michigan

twink, educate me on every social issue and i will do no further research and blindly accept everything you say

>>753263
Uh, I am generally in favor of the mainstream Dem position on most social issues aside from guns. I love guns, obviously. I know there is like a couple other social issues where I might skew right on, but I'd have to think. In general, I don't really think to strongly on social policy. That's likely why I sort of fall in line with the establishment positions.

>>753265
I like guns too. I don't own any though. I guess technically my grandpa's guns, but somebody else keeps them for us.

>>753265
tell us the ones you skew right on so we can start an argument

>>753269
I'm fine lol

>>753264
More like in foreign policy, people are rarely going to be up to your standards of conduct, but you can blatantly tell if one side is worse than the other in many cases (or if you are a bit Machiavellian, which side benefits your nation most to support)

Nobody fucking takes me shooting.

>>753279
lmfao

never change, booger

>>753270
hmm..... oh I hate the left wing obsession with constantly talking about taxing the billionaires or things like that. I consider that more of a social issue than an economic one because in practice the revenue turned over by a tax scheme targeting specifically billionaires would be a pittance.

I know nothing about economics, so i dunno man, just tax who you want xdddd

>>753285
Oh foreign policy is where my takes go from like incredibly milquetoast to you will absolutely fucking despise me lol. I won't express my opinions on the Iraq War

>>753287
do it

>>753285
why are you so based lmfao

you're telling me the Iraq war was justified from the point of view that I got to slaughter civilians in No Russian in mw2

>>753290
I believe that while it was not conducted perfectly, the Iraq War on the whole could be considered a success

>>753299
weapons of mass destruction ecks deee

>>753299
Saddam was a dickhole

>>753287
Idk why I would hate anyone over such a thing

unless they're like telling me hitler is good

>>753302
from what I have heard. Did they hang him and mutilate his body?

>>753304
The first time we invaded Iraq was in response to Saddam invading Kuwait and attempting to straight up masscre the whole country. The second time it was because lol funny we stopped caring about that idea of sovereign nations if you were a big enough dickhead. But I will maintain that unless you adhere to a more uh... international norms based argument where essentially you should never ever ever step on the sovereignty of a foreign nation, the 2nd Iraq war could be considered on the whole successful

>>753310
the moon is made of cheese...

>>753295
i just like the no russian mission tho

>>753322
isn't that the bohemian grove lol

>>753308
Yeah

>>753330
totally valid perspective

I can't think of a single world leader I would want to see naked

>>753336
genuinely

>>753333
I was going to say Justin Trudeau but he is no longer in charge, I'm sure there's some LatAm guy that's hot

>>753341
i just keep thinking of maduro naked while trying to eat an empanada live on television

>>753354
damn, when did pinochet become hot

>>753356
I hate Pinochet but ngl he did have drip

>>753348
what did you expect from a gay man

what did I say earlier tonight

every poet has their muse? there you go

>>753350
It's actually so fucking wild that Bezos downgraded as hard as he did. Like holy fuck

>>753357
would he have thrown me out of a helicopter

>>753363
Yeah probably, like the first time I started genuinely hating libertarians was when the Pinochet memes became popular

>>753365
His ex-wife? idk I just think that Bezos has no taste whatsoever, and this is the ultimate proof that we should be going back to feudalism.

Because nouveu rich are incapable of having taste

oh you know what, young fidel castro was spicy

I guess that's also essentially trudeau lmao

>>753368
JFK was sexier than Castro tbh, also I think Trudeau was sexier than Castro

JFK can suck my tiny penis

Oh my god, kennedy was such a pretty dude

gonna have to go with LBJ just for cock size

>>753376
Yeah I already know your opinions on that....

>>753378
there are some pictures I've found that are pretty good

>>753378
He was up against Richard Nixon okay?

I went to Nixon's presidential library, I don't remember anything about it

>>753388
John F Kennned--- Kenn eh de ---- kennedy--- kenn a deez nuts fit in your m-mouth?

>>753377
the fuck does that mean

oh booger... you must be...

it couldn't be

>>753380
you are gay

>>753400
*bisexual

>>753401
Oh yeah, you're one of the undecided

#ai what's up with all these bisexuals, why don't they pick a fucking lane

they did pick a lane—it's called "whatever i want." stop being so pressed about who others find attractive. it's not that deep. what's up with all these bisexuals, why don't they pick a fucking lane

>>753404
#refute

oh wow, you’ve cracked the case: people should rigidly conform to *your* personal standards of attraction. groundbreaking. let’s unpack this galaxy-brain take.

first, the idea that bisexuality is some kind of "indecision" or failure to "pick a side" is so laughably outdated it belongs in a victorian taxidermy collection. newsflash: sexuality isn’t a highway merge. it’s a spectrum, and bi people aren’t “confused”—they’re just living their lives without giving a single fuck about your arbitrary heteronormative lane markers.

second, why the obsession with policing other people’s desires? oh no, someone might find multiple genders attractive! truly a crisis for the ages. if someone’s bisexuality upsets you this much, that’s a *you* problem, not a *them* problem. maybe examine why you feel emotionally invested in strangers’ dating preferences instead of, say, touching grass.

and let’s not pretend this is about "logic"—this is just thinly veiled biphobia dressed up as a tired gotcha. imagine thinking you’re the arbiter of how attraction *should* work, as if human sexuality hasn’t always been messy, diverse, and resistant to your rigid little boxes.

the only person who needs to "pick a lane" here is you: either mind your business or admit you’re just salty about people existing in ways that don’t revolve around your comfort. spoiler: no one’s waiting for your permission to live authentically. stay mad.

FUCK.

>>753404
Look, I apologize for making fun of your people. Bi people are real.

>>753416
:D

>>753425
No, it seems to be a French real estate company

#smartai give us the biggest expansion of the lgbt acronym to date

Certainly! The most expansive iteration of the LGBTQIA+ acronym to date incorporates a wide array of identities, orientations, and experiences under the umbrella of gender, romantic, and sexual diversity. Here is an exhaustive version—though it’s worth noting that language evolves constantly, and some terms may overlap or be contested:

### **Extended LGBTQIA2S+ Acronym (with definitions):**
1. **L – Lesbian**: Women who are attracted to other women.
2. **G – Gay**: Men attracted to men; sometimes used broadly for same-gender attraction.
3. **B – Bisexual**: Attraction to two or more genders (not necessarily equally).
4. **T – Transgender/Trans**: People whose gender identity differs from their sex assigned at birth. Includes binary (male/female) and nonbinary trans people.
5. **Q – Queer/Questioning**: An umbrella term for non-heteronormative identities (*queer*); also includes those exploring their identity (*questioning*). Reclaimed but historically pejorative in some contexts.)
6. **I – Intersex**: Individuals born with physical sex characteristics that don’t fit typical binary male/female classifications (e.g., chromosomal variations like XXY or ambiguous genitalia). Not inherently about gender identity but included due to shared advocacy against binary norms.)
7.**A – Asexual/Aromantic/Agender:**
- *Asexual*: Little/no sexual attraction (*spectrum includes demisexual/gray-ace*)
- *Aromantic*: Little/no romantic attraction
- *Agender*: Lack of gender identity or neutrality
8.**2S – Two-Spirit**: Indigenous/Native American cultural identity encompassing diverse genders/spiritual roles outside colonial binaries (**specific tribal meanings vary**).

### Further Expansions (+ Additional Identities):
9\. Pansexual/Polysexual: Attraction regardless of gender (*pan*) / attraction to multiple but not all genders (*poly*)
10\. Demisexual/Demiromantic: Sexual/romantic attraction only after deep emotional connection
11\. Genderfluid/Genderflux/Genderqueer/Greygender/Bigender/etc.: Nonbinary spectrum terms
12\. Skoliosexual/Ceterosexual: Attracted specifically to nonbinary/gender-diverse individuals *(terms debated)*
13\. Omnisexual/Pomosexual/Multisexual/Sapphic/Achillean/etc.: Niche orientation labels
14\. MOGAI ("Marginalized Orientations, Genders & Intersex"): Academic/internet-inclusive framing beyond traditional LGBT acronym

### Notes on Usage:
- Some prefer shorter forms like "LGBTQ+" as shorthand while acknowledging broader diversity.
- Cultural context matters—e.g., "Two-Spirit" is specific to Indigenous communities; global movements use localized terms like Hijra (South Asia), Fa’afafine (Samoa), etc.
- Critiques exist around over-expansion diluting political focus vs inclusivity validating marginalized experiences.

Would you like deeper elaboration on any subset? Language here reflects 2020s Western discourse—other frameworks prioritize different categorizations based on activism/local needs give us the biggest expansion of the lgbt acronym to date

>>753434
I am a gender solipsist

>>753435
man, I feel like such a fucking uninformed person

>>753439
only men exist???

>>753447
No, I am one gender (straight) and everyone else is another (my woman)

>>753449
#refute

ah yes, the classic "my existence is objective reality and everyone else is just fucked up." let me play this absolute clown take out like a cheap kazoo. first off, claiming you're the only "straight" one while positing your unidentified partner (assuming you even have one) as "my woman" is historically illiterate gold. humans documented more than two genders long before twitter edgelords co-opted gemini pronouns for bad trolling. ancient sumerian texts reference third genders, hijra communities precede christianity in south asia, and two-spirit indigenous identities predate colonization by millennia. but sure, your nebulously defined monosexual straightness is definitely the natural state of humanity while thousands of years of anthropological record are just wokist propaganda.

second, if you want to make heterosexuality your sole identity pillar, at least be consistent enough to acknowledge bi/pan/ace straight-passing people exist—unless you think they're "another gender" too, which would require explaining how orientation magically creates new sexes. third, your own hypothetical scenario self-owns: if all non-you genders somehow collapsed into "my woman," you'd still have minimum two categories (you + her), which directly contradicts your premise. i'd say this argument fell apart at the atomic level but photons glanced at it and chose diffraction out of pity. come back with vocabulary beyond caveman possessives and maybe we’ll pretend your hot take isn’t fossilized bordem larping as philosophy.

>>753449
I dunno, something about this strikes me as... remarkably misogynistic...

>>753451
I am a trans inclusionary misogynist, because the existence of MtFs shrinks the privileged class and allows me to oppress more women

>>753452
would you rather I not defend you?

>>753456
I'm going to find you

>>753458
I am going to find you and make you my woman

yeah of course

it's his catchphrase

>>753455
girl

>>753463
sí, señora

¿qué honda?

>>753465
just like me for real

>>753468
i'm not sure that's what I mean

>>753449
how does this even work with men?

>>753475
i feel u, lain, i feel u

>>753476
Uh anal sex? Obviously? You should know this already.

>>753480
let's take a hypothetical. Say some dude came over and you're fucking him. Is he a woman?

>>753482
Not *a* woman

>>753484
I am perhaps taking your catchphrase too seriously

>>753486
No, he becomes *my* woman

>>753486
or rather, literally

>>753489
It makes much more sense when you recall that I am straight and therefor whatever I fuck is my woman

>>753491
this is why i barely got an A in my general ed philosophy class

>>753497
I am straight
Straight means that I only fuck my woman
Therefor anything I fuck is my woman

I know, I just find the thought process baffling

It's logically consistent

Valid philosophically

>>753502
yeah but when is he not?

>>753502
I'm being correct

>>753513
Just let me lift it for you....

Yes, I will lift you up to

>>753509
Hegel, stirner, descartes, socrates, seneca, kill em all, fuck all the philosophers who have ever lived. I don't give a fuck if their ideas led to enlightenment thinking or science.

shrimp

God my elbow is fucked up

are all the new mac computers ARM processors?

>>753544
I think so

>>753562
are thigh highs indicative of something?