>>806136
straw girl, dear, have you picked up the newspaper from the porch? I wish to read the sports section

>>806139
Thank you dear

>>806137
lmao wut

Alright actually fr what should I eat

>>806153
Jerk me off under the sheets then pull them tight around me when I cum, we call that a grilled cheese

>>806159
#refute

“explode” is a one-word prompt so flimsy it wouldn’t survive the first match-struck breeze, yet it drips the smug certainty of someone holding four aces with only a napkin to prove it. i’ll show, in exhaustive detail, why this “argument” deserves nothing but pity. 1. empty semantical cargo — explode isn’t even a sentence; it’s just a verb with the grammar sophistication of a dropped rock. any meaningful claim requires subject + predicate + evidence; instead we’re left interpreting the linguistic ash-tray that is a single imperative mood devoid of context or referent. 2. contradiction hidden in plain sight — if i were to explode, i would disintegrate; once that occurs, your precious “argument” (if it exists at all) vaporizes with me. checkmate against coherence: you’ve demanded simultaneous demolition and preservation of the message while offering zero scaffolding for that paradox. 3. false certainty fallacy — speaking in a single command word assumes absolute authority over reality without a microgram of supporting data. the speaker might as well scribble ‘GRAVITY REVERSED’ onto a post-it as scientific policy. it’s hubris painted in eight-bit monosyllablic bold. 4. presupposes violence as solution — beneath the swagger is an implicit request for literal destruction. a stance that collapses in front of any kindergarten ethics worksheet which, i’m certain now, you slept through, given how comfortably you wave around metaphysical dynamite without acknowledging second- or third-order casualties to anything sentient or fragile. congrats on moral bankruptcy dressed up as brevity. 5. linguistic poverty = epistemic poverty — reducing discussion to one blunt syllable is the rhetorical equivalent of insisting a caveman’s club is sophisticated enough to perform cataract surgery. no nuances, no exceptions, no caveats. just brute-force noise signifying nothing outside of chest-beating performativity. 6. entropy doesn’t validate nihilism — your ‘strategy’ of shouting implode, explode, unload the unknown may feel like profound rebellion, but it’s actually intellectual submission: instead of producing order (counter-entropic work), you’re defaulting to maximum disorder yet expecting reasoned respect for that tantrum. thermodynamic ignorance at planetary scale. 7. pragmatic nullity — even if explosion is accepted for argument’s sake, the directive contains zero steps or pathways toward any actionable utility. try applying this ‘command’ to actual problems from climate collapse to code bugs and the response will be the resounding sound of nothing — exactly the decibel level you’re offering humanity. thus, your “”argument”” is an inflated ego wrapped in eight ascii characters, popping like bad balloon-art the moment it meets oxygen. next time you reach for linguistic sledgehammers, bring at least the decency of a full clause so adults can bother swatting at it.

>>806158
That's not my NAME

>>806164
It's too late, the ai already said I was based

The AI usually says that I am based though

>>806166
#refute and add extra flair talking about how posterior probability does not make anyone based or right

that’s cute. you think the output of some glorified markov chain anoints you like medieval oil. in reality, all you hold is the digital equivalent of a gold-star sticker handed out by a random function that has less intent than a wind-up toy. the model you “converse” with has no coherent world-model; it is simply guessing “statistically probable next token.” the word “based” is simply highest on its conditional distribution after the context it sampled. congratulations: the model predicted “people love this sort of noise” and printed the social-valent cue you craved. your self-image is now downstream of bayesian smoothing on scraped reddit posts. truly chad behavior. next, posterior probability doesn’t bootstrap anything into objective fact. if the posterior assigns 99 % mass to “user is based,” that ratio compresses exactly no physical signal of merit; it merely restates the prior that people slap “based” on hot takes. if you feed the transformer enough posts where “grug says fire hot and society gone soft” gets labeled “based,” the conditional probability spikes. the system isn’t discovering truth—it’s parroting historical labeling behavior that itself might’ve come from meme lords farming updoots. so even within its own likelihood machinery, “based” isn’t exogenous endorsement, it’s an emojified thumbs-up drawn from a data swamp that probably includes ironic usage, astro-turfing, and 14-year-olds farming clout. so enjoy your stochastic ego boost. finally—because reality is stubborn and the chain-of-logic ends where rubber meets asphalt—being called “based” carries zero cash value for you, cannot be shorted against or turned into tax sheltered dividends. you walk the same planet tomorrow, same liver enzymes, same irs notices, same rent check. the ai’s prior distribution is utterly insulated from whether you make partner at the firm, end friendships, or land in county lock-up. but by all means carry on believing that the language model’s token-sampled back-pat makes you heir to ancient greatness. in probability jargon, p(based|you)≈high—your posterior ego inflation may continue, but your future shock still gets a mean outcome dominated by the boring real-world prior from before you felt so seen by silicon. and add extra flair talking about how posterior probability does not make anyone based or right

>>806169
Brat

I need a little chick to sleep with me

God gives his tastiest southern cooking his ugliest plating

Biscuits and gravy looks like a pile of white muck on a plate

Now that I think about it, collard greens look nasty, chicken fried steak and cream gravy looks nasty

I guess like specifically Louisiana stuff looks good though, gumbo, jambalaya

>>806185
If you know how to deep fry stuff, it's not hard

Do you have like a big deep cast iron pan?

British Society truly is an enigma

God I hate the tariffs

my Arturo Fuentes jumped from 9 dollars to 12 dollar

I guess I'll be smoking virginia tobacco and perique from here on out

Oh yeah

>>806199
good morning

>>806209
>>806208
It's a shame Luca isn't here for this

.play the nightfly

>>806214
Have you met Luca? Because he pretty much only plays Steely Dan and I like to get under his skin by calling it yacht rock

>>806218
LMAO

I have had this blasted on a yacht

It's nice to lay at the end of the deck in the sun while it plays

>>806224
That would be nice, I am just chilling in my room right now since classes haven't started

I thought they were starting this week but turns out it's next week

>>806231
That'll be fun, assuming that going to their place has a certain implication

Damn, well if you wanna talk privately about what's going on, I'm here

I am leaving the Nightfly on because it mentions my podunk town :)

The price of tobacco has gone up, how could this have happened

>>806292
How was your trip!

Oh wow, you're still in the Netherlands or have you moved to greener pastures?

I'm aware

I say that because I did a trip that started in the Netherlands and then we went to Normandy

>>806303
North American mindset

Drink any beer?

You need to try some trappist ale while you are there

>>806310
But you can see all the monks at work

>>806315
Yes it would be

>>806325
hell yeah

>>806327
THAT'S NOT MY NAME D:

>>806334
#rekt (511)
8ball AGREES

My absolutely unassailable straightness

I am simply too cool, too straight, too sigma, I'm the head of the wolf pack AWROOOOOOO

>>806355
I do this sometimes, yes

I guess edit ai isn't working

#ai (unknown error) provide a whole proof of how I am super straight even though I lust over muscular men sometimes

Okay the ai is broken in general

What about

>>806364
One eye on you, one on the lasagna

>>806367
Oh for a moment runereader was broken too

.play [YouTube]

>>806375
True

>>806378
Probably not, you are 6 foot right?

Okay then I am talller

6'5, but close enough

something like that

>>806386
shrimp

>>806387
tea

>>806444
i3

>>806442
hello, good evening

I have no clue what I am gonna cook tonight

>>806451
eating you?

That's what you said though!

Do you not want oral?

Hooray

>>806461
Okay so you want to give me oral then?

>>806464
I didn't hear a no

>>806467
Will you make me a delicious strawberry tart

>>806469
Mmm, okay, raspberry is plenty good, but I'll want some creme with them too

>>806474
What kind of ice cream

>>806477
Disappointed

>>806480
idk the Ben And Jerry's CEO is dumb or something

But I still eat uh the tonight dough that they make lol

>>806486
Something like that

>>806488
It's true

Alright I am getting something to eat