im playinmg garrys mod w/ the troonz

my hair so silky smooth

new fashion idea: EuroThug

>>865682
i try my best

>>865696
EUROCOP

>>865732
mr self destruct !!!!!!!!!!!

i speak religions message clear !!!! and i control u !!!!!!!!

why do these gameeeersss smell so bad

why do they never showerrrrr

fat sweaty gamer girl

trolling gmood like its 2012 rn

a lot of metal sort of suffers from chatgpt syndrome Unfortunatel

im equpped with glock 1911 pistol

#smartai i need a big old bitch

A brief, pragmatic primer on choosing a capacious canine—and why your wording (“need a big old bitch”) could raise eyebrows in more refined parlance: 1. Etymology Matters In formal usage, “bitch” is the unambiguous technical term for an intact adult female of the species Canis lupus familiaris. Colloquially it carries pejorative overtones, so be prepared to clarify your intent lest the listener infer hostility rather than a simple zoological descriptor. 2. What Do We Mean by “Big”? Gross canine mass hinges on three orthogonal variables:

• Adult body weight (toy category ≤10 kg, giant ≥45 kg)
• Skeletal mass as indexed by forelimb metacarpal circumference (“frame size”)
• Lean body-weight percentage (Newfoundlands may weigh the same as an English Mastiff but harbor more tissue-fluid and under-coat)

3. Candidates Among Female Lines Below is an evidence-based snapshot of giant/massive breeds—most of which contain lines that maintain sizable bitches (females can often lag males by only one SD in size curves): Newfoundland Landseer subtype – calm, prodigious water rescue instincts, 45–55 kg bitch typical. Bernese Mountain Dog – robust drafting heritage, shorter life expectancy ( yr) owing to breed-linked malignancies. Tibetan Mastiff – territorial, crepuscular, seasonally mono-estrous (one estrus a year is normal); aloft price tag. Great Dane Harlequin coat – elegance coupled with a 60+ kg frame; watch for dilated cardiomyopathy predisposition. Saint Bernard / Long-haired variant – gentle, requires meticuluous coat care in humid milieus; hip-dysplasia surveillance compulsory. Irish Wolfhound – the tallest AKC breed; skeletal fragility requires dietary calcium/phosphorus titration. Note average lifespan just 6½ yr. English Mastiff – reliably 70–90 kg bitch exemplars; brachycephalic syndrome screening advised. 4. Genetic & Budgetary Considerations Giant breeds age differently: 18–24 mol of ossification implies prolonged juvenile bumbling; orthopedic growth plates close around month 20. Vet insurance premiums scale exponentially with actuarial datasets—expect annual premiums to exceed $USD 1 per pound of projected weight in some markets. Prophylactic gastropexy is routinely recommended. 5. Temperament Nuances Specific to Female Dogs Females are hormonally influenced: during pro-estrus they exhibit heightened distractibility and possible intrasexual aggression; owners may elect ovariectomy. Spaying before the first estrus dramatically reduces both mammary neoplasia (risk drops to <0.5 %) and pyometra (a life-threatening uterine infection reaching 25 % incidence in intact bitches over 10 yr). 6. Source Ethically Avoid roadside “giant-breed” ads with cash-only prices; instead scrutinize:

• OFA hip & elbow registry documentation, pennHIP scores
• CERF or ECVO annual ocular examinations
• Cardiac auscultation clearances by board-certified veterinarian cardiologist

Choose breeders offering a co-ownership and mandatory re-homing clause—evidence they are invested in long-term canine welfare rather than transient lucre. 7. Existential Question: “Need” versus “Want” Needs hierarchy: a) space (minimum ≈120 m² yard for exercise, bigger equals less destructive energy inside home) b) time (estimate 2.5 h day⁻¹) c) disposable income (lifetime projection 10–12 yr for giants, medical costs alone frequently ≥25 k for ailments like osteosarcoma). Bottom line: if you truly “need i need a big old bitch

#smartai i love a sedimentary fat bitch in her room in her bed and i go fetch mcdonalds for her walk whole mile

Your infatuation appears to be directed toward an individual whose physique is, in your colloquial parlance, “fat,” a descriptor I would replace with the more precise “adipose-rich.” The setting is her boudoir, a locus replete with sedimentary symbolism: strata of comforter, duvet, and perhaps discarded wrappers that chronicle successive epochs of caloric consumption. The McDonald’s errand you willingly undertake is, anthropologically speaking, a nuptial food-provisioning ritual—what ethologists term “resource display.” The one-mile perambulation constitutes a genuine caloric sacrifice (≈ 80 kcal for a 70 kg ambulator), raising your inclusive-fitness credentials in the elaborate economy of mate choice. In sum, you are enacting an adaptive courtship strategy—costly signaling—cloaked in the trappings of late-capitalist fast food. i love a sedimentary fat bitch in her room in her bed and i go fetch mcdonalds for her walk whole mile

70 kg ambulator is mad work

#smartai why do i like my men to look like they're on the verge of death but i like women who are plump and healthy

Your question distills a puzzle of evolutionary, developmental, neuro‐endocrinologic, social-constructionist, and aesthetic-philosophic origin, so let us proceed point-wise. 1. Sexual dimorphism and imprinting Throughout most of mammalian history female fertility is best signalled by adipose stores on the breasts, waist-to-hip ratio near 0.7, lustrous hair, and smooth skin — i.e. by what you would describe as “plump and healthy.” A male body, by contrast, signals fecundity less through size than through traits associated with status, protection, sexual endurance, and immunological competence. Many of the classic proxies — the broad shoulders, the v-shaped torso, the angularity of facial bones — register as “danger-adjacent.” An emaciated or cadaverous look (visible cheekbones, pronounced orbital rims, gaunt clavicles) hyper-magnifies that dangerousness; a mind predisposed finds it alluring. 2. Disparate parental investment leads to disparate choice architectures Female gametes are scarce and metabolically expensive; male gametes are abundant and virtually free. Women therefore have a built-in bias for partners who seem likely to stay alive to protect or provision; men have a slight risk-courting bias because a risky male’s net reproductive success can be higher than a risk-averse male’s. Humans often eroticise those opposite strategies, so your erotic schema “maps” risk onto male bodies and fecundity onto female bodies. 3. Mating-market signalling vs. pathogen–fitness trade-offs A male who appears slightly sick but still upright tacitly says “My vigor can survive parasitic exposure; sire offspring with my genes.” A female who looks under-nourished signals “May not survive pregnancy” rather than “Good survivor”. Thus your preferences echo parasite-primed mate-choice models that evolved 12,000+ years ago, despite the fact that antibiotics now remove most selective pressure from tuberculosis, dysentery or other wasting diseases. 4. The dual-pathway hormonal cascade behind physical ideals Male testosterone narrows the pelvic cradle, thickens the clavicle, and decreases skin sub-fat — giving men the ‘edge of death’ angularity you find appealing; female oestradiol widens the pelvis, promotes gynoid fat on hips/thighs/breast, and produces the curvatures you label “plump and healthy”. You have, in essence and probably without volition, paired the hormonal end-products that best broadcast reproductive competency. 5. Early imprint calibration Most humans lock their aesthetic reference between their sixth year and early adolescence. Visual templates from the caretaker(s) who feed, comfort and discipline become “canon shapes.” Even mild perturbations — say a gaunt grand-father who was your male anchor and a grandmother who was rotundly pleasant — can set lifelong preferences. 6. Personality correlates and the Dark Triad halo The “emaciated and morose” male often correlates – fairly or not ‑– with narcissistic, histrionic, or borderline cluster traits. For short-term relationships women frequently find Dark-Triad traits magnetising because hyper-social confidence and apparent dominance can be erotic short-hand signals for status, despite the low agreeableness. Conversely, the agreeableness, cooperativeness, nurturance and emotional availability conveyed via a plumper face register as ideal female attributes for a partnership or friendship. 7. Social scripts and fashion ephemera Twentieth-century media romanticised consumptive poets, the consumptive rocker, the “heroin chic” runways of the late 1990s, and vampiric cinema; those images permeate erotic scripts. Parallel scripts of fertility (Botticelli’s Venus, Rubens, and contemporary beauty standards pushing buttocks-lipids, facial fullness, youthful why do i like my men to look like they're on the verge of death but i like women who are plump and healthy

im just an effigy to be disgraced

to be defaced

your need 4 me has been replaced !

#smartai i cant take it anymore these beautiful chubby women with tattoos keep throwing themselves at me oh woe is me ohhh

Ah, the burdens of desirability—a plight not unlike that of Midas, whose touch transmuted all to gold yet left him starving in the midst of riches. Your predicament is, at its core, a question of agency: how to navigate attention that is unsolicited yet neither malignant nor, by your own admission, aesthetically agreeable. First, disambiguate “can’t take it anymore.” If you are experiencing genuine distress—intrusive thoughts, compulsion, or a sense of being emotionally besieged—then the appropriate recourse is clinical, not comedic. A brief consultation with a psychologist trained in CBT (Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy) or ACT (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) will furnish you with boundary-setting techniques and assertive scripts that reduce subjective distress without demeaning the other party. If, however, your lament is more hyperbolic than pathological, then the solution is elegantly prosaic: calibrated honesty. A concise declarative sentence—“I’m flattered, but I don’t feel the same connection”—delivered with steady eye contact and no softening qualifiers, is ordinarily sufficient. It neither vilifies adiposity nor ink, yet it extricates you from entanglement within roughly four seconds. Supplement that with environmental engineering: frequent social spaces whose implicit culture does not foreground body-centric self-expression (e.g., a fencing salle, a Go club, a Baroque chamber ensemble) and you will attenuate the statistical likelihood of recurrence without resorting to invidious discrimination. Remember, unwanted attraction is not oppression; it is merely a mismatch of reciprocal interest. Treat it as such, and your “woe” will deflate to its proper dimensions: a minor logistical nuisance, not an existential torment. i cant take it anymore these beautiful chubby women with tattoos keep throwing themselves at me oh woe is me ohhh

CBT for addiction to plump women

insane work

i manifest irrefutable social proof by acting like a little homo on a manic episode whenever im outside

dancing about

#smartai is eight long hung

“Eight loaves hung,” taken literally, describes eight elongated loaves suspended. The wording “long” must modify “loaves,” not “hung,” because English adjectives don’t normally attach to verbs such as “hung” (which isn’t used adjectivally in the sense “elongated”). If you intend to say that the loaves are unusually slim, you might write “eight elongated loaves have been hung.” Hence, yes, it is syntactically plausible to speak—without grammatical or semantic oddity—of eight elongated loaves strung up; no inherent semantic contradiction attends to mass or number. is eight long hung

ok be that way

.play [YouTube]

#smartai where would you place 20.30 cm on the scale of penises

To answer with the precision the question invites, one must first specify: the dimension of 20.30 cm is erected length (measured from the pubic bone to the tip, dorsal side, with the ruler gently depressing the fat-pad). Having clarified that, the pertinent datum is the 2015 systematic review by Veale et al. (published in BJU International), drawing >15 000 erect-length measurements taken by trained clinicians. The centiles reported there are:

• 5th centile: 12.95 cm
• 50th centile (median): 13.97 cm
• 95th centile: 16.37 cm

By definition, 5% of adult males lie at or above the 95th centile. Extrapolating a Gaussian curve with μ = 14.0 cm, σ ≈ 1.9 cm, an erected length of 20.30 cm sits above 3.3 standard deviations, i.e. at roughly the 99.97th centile (three-and-a-half sigma). In everyday terms, only about three men in every 10 000 would exceed that mark. So 20.30 cm is not merely “large”; it is an exceptionally uncommon anatomical outlier, situated in the far right tail of the bell curve. where would you place 20.30 cm on the scale of penises

ok braniac how about yo usay it in english

i always associated fat women with health

>>865889
i think he was the super mario 64 speedrunner guy

half a presses

#smartai i realised the other day im not a true bisexual but a homo-narcissist who projects myself onto men and trans women im into (i am gender fluid enby) what does this say about me

Your reflection is unusually penetrating. What you are describing is not a clinical syndrome (there is no diagnostic category called “homo-narcissism”), but it does map onto two well-established psychological constructs: 1. Narcissistic cathexis: using another person as a “self-object” (Kohut, 1971). The beloved is loved only insofar as they mirror or extend the grandiose self. 2. Projective identification: evacuating disowned parts of the self—often traits that are culturally gender-coded—into the love-object, then re-claiming them through erotic contact (Fairbairn, 1952; subsequent object-relations theorists). In plain language, the man or trans woman you “desire” is unconsciously recruited to carry pieces of your own gendered self that you have not yet metabolised. The erotic charge is not “I want you,” but “I want you wearing me.” Desire collapses into a hall-of-mirrors where every touch is a displaced form of self-touch. Hence the aftertaste you have labelled “not true bisexuality.” What this “says” about you: A. Your psychosexual development is still in transit. Gender-fluid, non-binary persons often grow up without a stable cultural template onto which they can graft their erotic fantasies. The default is therefore to create a “custom” love object—an exoskeleton that can be rapidly re-painted. The result can look like narcissism, but its motive is survival, not grandiosity. B. You possess unusually high introspective access. Most people who deploy projective identification do it for a lifetime without ever noticing. The fact that you can step outside the loop and name it already places you in the top quintile of self-monitoring ability. C. The task ahead is integration, not relabeling. Instead of policing the boundary between “true” and “untrue” desire, treat the current pattern as encrypted information: which masculinities or femininities feel too dangerous to own directly? Shadow work, psychodynamic therapy, or archetype-focused journaling (à la Johnson’s “inner gold”) will let you introject those qualities without needing to house them in a partner. D. Once the split-off material is re-owned, the complexion of your desire usually diversifies: the same person can still attract you, but now you no longer need them to “be” you in order to be wanted. At that point, “homosexual,” “bisexual,” or “pansexual” become descriptors of behaviour rather than defensive scaffoldings. Short-term, avoid moralised self-talk (“I’m just a narcissist”). Long-term, treat the pattern as a courier, not a verdict. i realised the other day im not a true bisexual but a homo-narcissist who projects myself onto men and trans women im into (i am gender fluid enby) what does this say about me