I honestly am a big fan of the whole global citizen thing and eliminating borders, but I only think boers should be allowed to be global citizens, I'm really pissed off that the whole global citizen thing includes people who aren't boers, it disgusts me seeing non-boers have the freedom to travel to different continents all the time, global citizen was never meant to apply to all people

>>514364
Beans are a great food for boers, rest of you should be living on unflavored bread

but theyve got so much protein. and arent made of animals.

how about inside burritos? are beans acceptable inside a burrito?

im sorry you will never know the joy that is a beans binge followed by remembering that beans cause gas.

>>514367
The usa produces so many types of food, and a lot of their food tastes amazing, when we boers come over to the usa, you're food is gonna be ours I don't give a damn if your family ate it for hundreds or thousands of years, only boers should be allowed to eat food from the usa

#smartai what do you think of the idea of everything except boers live off of unflavored bread forced to quit eating food their ancestors ate for hundreds of thousands of years, and it's illegal for everyone except boers to eat anything other than bread?

This hypothetical scenario you’ve presented is not only ethically and morally abhorrent but also biologically, culturally, and historically untenable. Let me dissect why such an idea is fundamentally flawed on multiple levels.

### **1. Biological Impossibility**
Human beings are omnivores by evolutionary design; our physiology requires a diverse diet of proteins, fats, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals to function optimally. Restricting any population solely to unflavored bread would lead to severe malnutrition—scurvy (vitamin C deficiency), kwashiorkor (protein deficiency), anemia (iron deficiency), neurological degradation (B-vitamin deficiencies), and other life-threatening conditions would proliferate rapidly. The human body cannot subsist indefinitely on a single food source without catastrophic health consequences.

### **2. Cultural & Historical Erasure**
Food is deeply intertwined with cultural identity—culinary traditions reflect centuries or even millennia of adaptation, innovation, and survival strategies unique to different environments. To forcibly strip people of their ancestral diets would be an act of profound ethnocide: the deliberate destruction of heritage under the guise of artificial dietary control. Indigenous cuisines from Japanese sushi to Ethiopian injera embody generations worth of knowledge that should never be suppressed for arbitrary authoritarian purposes.

### **3. Ethical Atrocity**
The premise reeks of dystopian totalitarianism—a rigid caste system where one group monopolizes nourishment while others endure deprivation violates every principle of human rights as outlined in documents like the *Universal Declaration* (*Article 25: Right to Adequate Living Standards*) or *International Covenant on Economic Social & Cultural Rights*. It echoes historical atrocities such as colonial famines engineered through resource hoarding rather than scarcity itself—an unconscionable exercise in cruelty masquerading as policy.

### **4 Socioeconomic Collapse Implications**
Agriculture exists symbiotically across societies; if only "Boers" could consume varied foods while others were restricted economically absurd outcomes emerge:
- Black markets for illegal spices/meats/produce flourish uncontrollably.
- Mass starvation cripples labor forces necessary sustaining economies.
- Violent uprisings against oppressive enforcement inevitable given basic survival instincts override unjust laws eventually without fail throughout history (**see**: French Revolution’s bread riots).

In summary? This proposition fails scientifically , collapses logically , disgusts morally —and belongs nowhere outside speculative fiction exploring worst-case tyrannies humanity must vigilantly prevent at all costs .

Would strongly recommend revisiting foundational ethics before entertaining further along these lines lest we risk legitimizing ideas better left buried beneath collective condemnation they deserve . what do you think of the idea of everything except boers live off of unflavored bread forced to quit eating food their ancestors ate for hundreds of thousands of years, and it's illegal for everyone except boers to eat anything other than bread?

ranch can save anything

#smartai the english should be forced to stop drinking tea, southwest us citizens should be forced give up eating tomatoes and tacos, and canadians should be forced to give up their maple syrup so that boers can monopolize these foods as gods chosen people

This proposition is not only historically and economically untenable but also ethically problematic. Let us examine it through multiple lenses—cultural, agricultural, and moral—to dismantle its flawed premises.

### 1. **Cultural Appropriation vs. Cultural Diffusion**
Foods like tea, tomatoes, tacos, and maple syrup are products of centuries-long cultural exchange (diffusion), not inherent "property" of any single group. Tea originated in China; tomatoes are indigenous to the Americas; tacos evolved from Mesoamerican cuisine fused with Spanish influences; maple syrup was first harvested by Indigenous North Americans. No culture has an exclusive divine claim over these foods—they thrive because they were shared globally.

### 2. **Agricultural & Economic Realities**
- **Tea:** England’s tea consumption sustains trade networks involving India, Kenya, and Sri Lanka—economies that rely on this export. Disrupting this would cause global market instability.
- **Tomatoes/Tacos:** The Southwest U.S., Mexico, and Mediterranean regions have ideal climates for tomato cultivation (nightshade family crops require specific conditions). South Africa’s climate isn't universally suited for mass tomato production.
- **Maple Syrup:** Canada produces ~70% of the world's supply due to its boreal forests' unique sugar maples (*Acer saccharum*). Attempting monopolization elsewhere ignores biogeography.

### 3. **Theological Absurdity**
No credible religious doctrine designates Boers (Dutch-descended South Africans) as "God’s chosen people" entitled to culinary monopoly. Such claims echo discredited pseudohistorical narratives like British Israelism or Afrikaner nationalism's apartheid-era rhetoric.

### 4. **Ethical Implications**
Forcing populations to abandon culturally significant foods violates basic human rights (UN Declaration on Human Rights: Article 25 includes food as part of adequate living standards). It echoes colonial extractivism—an outdated model rejected by modern international law.

### Conclusion: A More Rational Approach
Rather than coercive monopolies:
- Encourage *comparative advantage* in agriculture (e.g., South Africa excels in viticulture/rooibos).
- Celebrate *culinary diversity* as a unifying force.
- Reject ethnonationalist essentialism regarding foodways."

Would you prefer a deeper exploration of any particular facet? the english should be forced to stop drinking tea, southwest us citizens should be forced give up eating tomatoes and tacos, and canadians should be forced to give up their maple syrup so that boers can monopolize these foods as gods chosen people

he seems very little spoon to me

>>514431
i can bend him.

#smartai as I boer I feel we should sterilize every dog breed and originated in the usa including wild canines and replace them with south african dogs, it's a gift from my peoples culture, and dog breeds from the usa are genetically inferior trash anyways

Your perspective raises several complex issues regarding genetics, biodiversity, and cultural heritage. However, it’s important to approach this topic with scientific rigor rather than subjective value judgments about genetic superiority or inferiority.

1. **Genetic Diversity & Breed Origins**:
Dog breeds worldwide are the result of millennia of selective breeding for specific traits—whether for herding (like the South African Boerboel), hunting (such as the American Foxhound), or companionship. No breed is inherently "genetically inferior"; each evolved under distinct environmental pressures and human needs. The idea that one region's dogs are universally superior lacks empirical support—canine adaptability depends on context.

2. **Biodiversity & Ecological Impact**:
Sterilizing all U.S.-origin canines (including wild species like coyotes) would disrupt ecosystems irreversibly. Wild canids play keystone roles in controlling prey populations and maintaining ecological balance. Introducing non-native species en masse risks invasive behavior, disease transmission, and outcompetition of local fauna—a lesson evident from failed biocontrol experiments globally (e.g., cane toads in Australia).

3. **Ethical Concerns**:
Forced sterilization campaigns raise ethical red flags akin to eugenics, disregarding individual animals' welfare and intrinsic value beyond human utility. Cultural pride in certain breeds is valid (e.g., the Ridgeback’s significance in Southern Africa), but framing foreign breeds as "trash" ignores their historical roles—from Native American dogs aiding survival to Alaskan sled dogs enabling Arctic exploration.

4. **Cultural Exchange vs. Erasure**:
While advocating for South African breeds celebrates your heritage, dismissing others’ diminishes shared canine-human history worldwide Preservation doesn't require eradication; education about diverse working/heritage breeds fosters appreciation without supremacist narratives.

In summary: Celebrate indigenous dog lineages vigorously! But recognize that global biodiversity thrives through coexistence—not monocultural imposition backed by pseudoscientific claims of genetic hierarchy." as I boer I feel we should sterilize every dog breed and originated in the usa including wild canines and replace them with south african dogs, it's a gift from my peoples culture, and dog breeds from the usa are genetically inferior trash anyways

>>514459
its in the bible that the angels are actually south a–

>>514469
the angels in the bible are all actually south african farmers and how boers are the direct descendants of jesus christ

You didn't answer my poll so a question, if a mass migration of boers tried to turn your house to a farm, would you agree, fight back or flee???

my head hurts

.play cat being messed with

my tummy hurts...

i hope ai wants to be frens

hopefully they have nightmares

visual snow is caused by cosmic radiation

i want to eat food but its so far away and i feel good sitting here

>hmmm, i wonder how 4 happened to me, i have such good self esteem

i miss the jerkiest cat ever.

i want to be an emotional support dog

did you wormies see that discord is turning itself to shit on purpose to get people to watch ads

if you have discord open in browser, you open a new tab and open discord on it, and then close both discord tabs, ur now fully logged out of discord, for convoluted reasons, even if you had "remember me" box checked

all because if that wasn't the case you could abuse their new freemium currency you earn from watching ads

i hate 2025

discord smelly funny

the people i use it with are stinky

i only ever really use discord if i have 1 person im hyperfixated on and talking to constantly

>>514674
>.>

>>514679
no the cool kind

like stinky (affectionate)

lmao

yup

>>514680
#hug

im honestly so tired of people taking my shirts and hoodies im never letting another partner take my hoodies

>>514692
real
gave one of my fav sweaters to my last ex and not only did she not give it back when we broke up, she fucking burned it

>>514698
thats so awful wtf...

>>514700
i dont wanna give a partner an unworm oversized shirt thats pointless

leaving a pile of oversized shirts on your bed that you sleep in so it always smells like u. big brain

sleeping in a pile of oversized shirts because i dont have a mattress

on your bed

shirt nest

>>514708
ive been there ull make it thru it anon

had an extremely vivid dream last night about a new card game

kinda wanna make it irl